Skip to main content

What Makes a Catholic Hospital “Catholic” in an Age of Religious-Secular Collaboration? The Case of the Saint Marys Hospital and the Mayo Clinic

Abstract

Mayo Clinic is recognized as a worldwide leader in innovative, high-quality health care. However, the Catholic mission and ideals from which this organization was formed are not widely recognized or known. From partnership with the Sisters of St. Francis in 1883, through restructuring of the Sponsorship Agreement in 1986 and current advancements, this Catholic mission remains vital today at Saint Marys Hospital. This manuscript explores the evolution and growth of sponsorship at Mayo Clinic, defined as “a collaboration between the Sisters of St. Francis and Mayo Clinic to preserve and promote key values that the founding Franciscan sisters and Mayo physicians embrace as basic to their mission, and to assure the Catholic identity of Saint Marys Hospital.” Historical context will be used to frame the evolution and preservation of Catholic identity at Saint Marys Hospital; and the shift from a “sponsorship-by-governance” to a “sponsorship-by-influence” model will be highlighted. Lastly, using the externally-developed Catholic Identity Matrix (developed by Ascension Health and the University of St. Thomas, Minnesota), specific examples of Catholic identity will be explored in this joint venture of Catholic health care institution and a secular, nonprofit corporation (Mayo Clinic).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bellandi, D. (1998). What hospitals won’t do for a merger. Modern Health Care, 28(39), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernardin, J. (1996). What makes a hospital Catholic—A response. America (NY), 174(15), 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berry, L., & Seltman, K. (2008). Management Lessons from Mayo clinic: inside one of the world’s most admired service organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  4. Brinkmann, B., Maines, T. D., Naughton, M. J., Stebbins, J. M., & Weimerskirch, A. (2006). Bridging the gap. Catholic health care organizations need concrete ways to connect social principles to practice. Health Prog, 87(6), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Byron, W. J. (1996). Catholic health care: Partnering and progress. America (NY), 175(8), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Catholic Health Association of the United States. (1980). Evaluative criteria for Catholic health care facilities. St. Louis: The Catholic Health Association of the United States.

  7. Clapsattle, H. (1969). The Doctors Mayo (5th ed.). Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cochran, C. E. (1999). Institutional identity; sacramental potential: Catholic healthcare at century’s end. Christ Bioeth, 5(1), 26–43. doi:10.1076/chbi.5.1.26.3793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Curran, C. (1997). The Catholic identity of Catholic institutions. Theological Studies, 58(1), 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delkeskamp-Hayes, C. (2001). Christian credentials for Roman Catholic health care: Medicine versus the healing mission of the church. Christ Bioeth, 7(1), 117–150. doi:10.1076/chbi.7.1.117.3770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dougherty, C. J. (2004). Ethical dimensions of trusteeship on the boards of Catholic hospitals and systems. In B. Jennings, B. H. Gray, V. A. Sharpe, & A. R. Fleischman (Eds.), The ethics of hospital trustees (pp. 181–199). Washington: Georgetown U P.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Engelhardt, H. T. (2001). The deChristianization of Christian health care institutions, or, how the pursuit of social justice and excellence can obscure the pursuit of holiness. Christ Bioeth, 7(1), 151–161. doi:10.1076/chbi.7.1.151.3769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Institute of Standards and Techonology. (2012). Baldrige performance excellence program: Criteria for performance excellence. Accessed Dec 12, 2012 from http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/business_nonprofit_criteria.cfm.

  14. Nelson, C. (1990). Mayo roots: Profiling the origins of Mayo clinic. Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Rourke, K. (2001). Catholic hospitals and Catholic identity. Christ Bioeth, 7(1), 15–28. doi:10.1076/chbi.7.1.15.3762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Rourke, K., Kopfen-Steiner, T., & Hamel, R. (2001). A brief history. A summary of the development of the ethical and religious directives for Catholic health care services. Health Prog, 82(6), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Panicola, M. R. (2002). A cautionary tale: Can Catholic health care maintain its identity and integrity while meeting the challenges of the marketplace? America (NY), 186(14), 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pope Paul VI (1965). Apostolicam Actuositatem (Decree on the Apostolate of the Laity).

  19. Stempsey, W. E. (2001). Institutional identity and Roman Catholic hospitals. Christ Bioeth, 7(1), 3–14. doi:10.1076/chbi.7.1.3.3768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Torrens, P. R. (1996). What makes a hospital Catholic? The Chicago case. America (NY), 174(11), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. United States Catholic Conference. (1981). Health and health care. Washington DC: United States Catholic Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  22. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2009). Ethical and religious directives for catholic health care services (5th ed.). Washington DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

    Google Scholar 

  23. University of St. Thomas. (2012). About the Catholic identity matrix (CIM). Accessed March 16, 2012 from http://www.stthomas.edu/business/centers/veritas/assessments/cim.html.

  24. Whelan, E. (2002). The Sisters’ Story: Saint Marys Hospital—Mayo Clinic, 1889 to 1939. Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Whelan, E. (2007). The Sisters’ Story, Part Two: Saint Marys Hospital—Mayo Clinic, 1939 to 1980. Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Jonathan J. Oviatt, Esq., Chief Legal Officer of the Mayo Clinic and the Members of the Saint Marys Sponsorship Board Inc. for their thoughtful review.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith M. Swetz.

Additional information

This study was conducted on behalf of the Saint Marys Hospital Sponsorship Board, Inc.

The list of members who participated in this study are given in the appendix.

Content presented, in part, at the 2012 Catholic Health Assembly, Catholic Health Association of the United States, Philadelphia, PA, June 3–5, 2012.

Appendix

Appendix

Margaret Jean Keniry, OSF (President); Douglas A. Parks (Vice-President); Barbara A. Trueman, OSF (Secretary/Treasurer); Barbara L. Frederick (ex-officio, Administrator, Hospital Operations at Saint Marys Hospital) as well as Michael P. Bannon MD, MA; Brent A. Bauer MD; Lisa C. Carter; Donald L. DeCramer; Eric S. Edell MD; Glenn S. Forbes, MD; Rev. James H. Kunz; Marilyn Geiger, OSF, Joanne M. Loecher, OSF; Robert M. Morse, MD; Kimberly K. Otte, Esq.; Carmen Sonnek, OSF; Cheryl A. Weisbrod; and Julie L. Caulfield (Recording Secretary).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swetz, K.M., Crowley, M.E. & Maines, T.D. What Makes a Catholic Hospital “Catholic” in an Age of Religious-Secular Collaboration? The Case of the Saint Marys Hospital and the Mayo Clinic. HEC Forum 25, 95–107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-012-9207-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Catholic health care services
  • Catholic identity
  • Sponsorship-by-influence
  • Sponsorship-by-governance
  • Catholic-secular partnerships