HEC Forum

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 95–107

What Makes a Catholic Hospital “Catholic” in an Age of Religious-Secular Collaboration? The Case of the Saint Marys Hospital and the Mayo Clinic

  • Keith M. Swetz
  • Mary E. Crowley
  • T. Dean Maines
Article
  • 364 Downloads

Abstract

Mayo Clinic is recognized as a worldwide leader in innovative, high-quality health care. However, the Catholic mission and ideals from which this organization was formed are not widely recognized or known. From partnership with the Sisters of St. Francis in 1883, through restructuring of the Sponsorship Agreement in 1986 and current advancements, this Catholic mission remains vital today at Saint Marys Hospital. This manuscript explores the evolution and growth of sponsorship at Mayo Clinic, defined as “a collaboration between the Sisters of St. Francis and Mayo Clinic to preserve and promote key values that the founding Franciscan sisters and Mayo physicians embrace as basic to their mission, and to assure the Catholic identity of Saint Marys Hospital.” Historical context will be used to frame the evolution and preservation of Catholic identity at Saint Marys Hospital; and the shift from a “sponsorship-by-governance” to a “sponsorship-by-influence” model will be highlighted. Lastly, using the externally-developed Catholic Identity Matrix (developed by Ascension Health and the University of St. Thomas, Minnesota), specific examples of Catholic identity will be explored in this joint venture of Catholic health care institution and a secular, nonprofit corporation (Mayo Clinic).

Keywords

Catholic health care services Catholic identity Sponsorship-by-influence Sponsorship-by-governance Catholic-secular partnerships 

References

  1. Bellandi, D. (1998). What hospitals won’t do for a merger. Modern Health Care, 28(39), 29.Google Scholar
  2. Bernardin, J. (1996). What makes a hospital Catholic—A response. America (NY), 174(15), 9–11.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, L., & Seltman, K. (2008). Management Lessons from Mayo clinic: inside one of the world’s most admired service organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Brinkmann, B., Maines, T. D., Naughton, M. J., Stebbins, J. M., & Weimerskirch, A. (2006). Bridging the gap. Catholic health care organizations need concrete ways to connect social principles to practice. Health Prog, 87(6), 43–50.Google Scholar
  5. Byron, W. J. (1996). Catholic health care: Partnering and progress. America (NY), 175(8), 16–21.Google Scholar
  6. Catholic Health Association of the United States. (1980). Evaluative criteria for Catholic health care facilities. St. Louis: The Catholic Health Association of the United States.Google Scholar
  7. Clapsattle, H. (1969). The Doctors Mayo (5th ed.). Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.Google Scholar
  8. Cochran, C. E. (1999). Institutional identity; sacramental potential: Catholic healthcare at century’s end. Christ Bioeth, 5(1), 26–43. doi:10.1076/chbi.5.1.26.3793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curran, C. (1997). The Catholic identity of Catholic institutions. Theological Studies, 58(1), 90–108.Google Scholar
  10. Delkeskamp-Hayes, C. (2001). Christian credentials for Roman Catholic health care: Medicine versus the healing mission of the church. Christ Bioeth, 7(1), 117–150. doi:10.1076/chbi.7.1.117.3770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dougherty, C. J. (2004). Ethical dimensions of trusteeship on the boards of Catholic hospitals and systems. In B. Jennings, B. H. Gray, V. A. Sharpe, & A. R. Fleischman (Eds.), The ethics of hospital trustees (pp. 181–199). Washington: Georgetown U P.Google Scholar
  12. Engelhardt, H. T. (2001). The deChristianization of Christian health care institutions, or, how the pursuit of social justice and excellence can obscure the pursuit of holiness. Christ Bioeth, 7(1), 151–161. doi:10.1076/chbi.7.1.151.3769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. National Institute of Standards and Techonology. (2012). Baldrige performance excellence program: Criteria for performance excellence. Accessed Dec 12, 2012 from http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/business_nonprofit_criteria.cfm.
  14. Nelson, C. (1990). Mayo roots: Profiling the origins of Mayo clinic. Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.Google Scholar
  15. O’Rourke, K. (2001). Catholic hospitals and Catholic identity. Christ Bioeth, 7(1), 15–28. doi:10.1076/chbi.7.1.15.3762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Rourke, K., Kopfen-Steiner, T., & Hamel, R. (2001). A brief history. A summary of the development of the ethical and religious directives for Catholic health care services. Health Prog, 82(6), 18–21.Google Scholar
  17. Panicola, M. R. (2002). A cautionary tale: Can Catholic health care maintain its identity and integrity while meeting the challenges of the marketplace? America (NY), 186(14), 13–15.Google Scholar
  18. Pope Paul VI (1965). Apostolicam Actuositatem (Decree on the Apostolate of the Laity).Google Scholar
  19. Stempsey, W. E. (2001). Institutional identity and Roman Catholic hospitals. Christ Bioeth, 7(1), 3–14. doi:10.1076/chbi.7.1.3.3768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Torrens, P. R. (1996). What makes a hospital Catholic? The Chicago case. America (NY), 174(11), 9.Google Scholar
  21. United States Catholic Conference. (1981). Health and health care. Washington DC: United States Catholic Conference.Google Scholar
  22. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2009). Ethical and religious directives for catholic health care services (5th ed.). Washington DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.Google Scholar
  23. University of St. Thomas. (2012). About the Catholic identity matrix (CIM). Accessed March 16, 2012 from http://www.stthomas.edu/business/centers/veritas/assessments/cim.html.
  24. Whelan, E. (2002). The Sisters’ Story: Saint Marys Hospital—Mayo Clinic, 1889 to 1939. Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research.Google Scholar
  25. Whelan, E. (2007). The Sisters’ Story, Part Two: Saint Marys Hospital—Mayo Clinic, 1939 to 1980. Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith M. Swetz
    • 1
  • Mary E. Crowley
    • 2
  • T. Dean Maines
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Saint Marys Hospital, Mayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Veritas Institute, University of Saint ThomasSaint PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations