Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic Diagnosis, Confidentiality and Counseling: An Ethics Committee’s Potential Deliberations about the Do’s and Don’ts

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial Disclosure. (1998). ASHG statement: professional disclosure of familial genetic information. American Journal of Human Genetics, 62(2): 474–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly M.B. (2001). Communicating genetic test results to the family: a six-step, skills-building strategy. Family and Community Health, 24(3): 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Deftos L.J. (1998). The evolving duty to disclose the presence of genetic disease to relatives. Academic medicine, 73(9): 962–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French National Consultative Ethics Committee. (1995). Génétique et médecine: de la prédiction à la prévention. Les cahiers du Comité Consultatif National d’éthique pour les Sciences de la vie et de la santé, [On-line] Available: www.ccne-ethique.fr/.

  • General Medical Council. (2000). Confidentiality: protecting and providing information – duties of a doctor. London: General Medical Council.

  • Gevers J.K.M. (2004). Omgaan met genetische informatie ten aanzien van bloedverwanten: juridische overwegingen. In: Gordijn, B. (eds) Spreken of zwijgen. Over de omgang met genetische tests., pp 29–50. Nijmegen, Valkhof Pers

    Google Scholar 

  • Gezondheidsraad. (1989). Beroepsgroep genetica. Erfelijkheid: wetenschap en maatschappij. Den Haag; Gezondheidsraad: publication number 31/89.

  • Gordijn B. (2006). Aufklärung von Familienangehörigen mit erhöhtem Risiko für eine genetische Krankheitsdisposition. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 131(11): 573–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henn W. (2002). Probleme der ärztlichen Schweigepflicht in Familien mit Erbkrankheiten. Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik, 48(4): 343–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian-Reynier C. (2000). Disclosure to the family of breast/ovarian cancer genetic test results: patient’s willingness and associated factors. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94(1): 13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenen, H.J.J. (2000). Handboek Gezondheidsrecht. Deel 1: Rechten van mensen in de gezondheidszorg. Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.

  • Lehmann L.S. (2000). Disclosure of familial genetic information: perceptions of the duty to inform. The American journal of medicine, 109(9): 705–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieboom, W. (2002). Informatie, toestemming en geheimhouding bij erfelijkheidsadvisering. Een gezondheidsrechtelijk onderzoek. Den Haag: Koninklijke Vermande.

  • KNMG. (1998). Artsen en genen. Aanbevelingen van de KNMG inzake genetica.

  • National Health and Medical Research Council. (2000). Ethical aspects of human genetic testing: an information paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. [On-line] Available: www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/_ files/e39.pdf.

  • Niermeijer, M.F. et al. (2004). Meedelen en mededelen van erfelijkheidsgegevens in de familie: spreken of (ver)zwijgen door de “familieloze mens”. De geneticus als boodschapper? In: Gordijn, B. (ed.), Spreken of zwijgen. Over de omgang met genetische tests. Nijmegen: Valkhof Pers, pp. 15–28.

  • Parker M. and Lucassen A. (2002). Working towards ethical management of genetic testing. The Lancet, 360(9346): 1685–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1983). Screening and counseling for genetic conditions, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. (1993). Medical-ethical guidelines for genetic investigations in humans. Bulletin des Medécins Suisses, 74 (38): 1454–1458

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (137 EFG), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Bert Gordijn

Authors
  1. Bert Gordijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert Gordijn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordijn, B. Genetic Diagnosis, Confidentiality and Counseling: An Ethics Committee’s Potential Deliberations about the Do’s and Don’ts. HEC Forum 19, 303–312 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-007-9057-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-007-9057-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation