Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Productivity growth and quality changes of hospitals in Taiwan: does ownership matter?

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the competition in the Taiwanese medical industry becomes increasingly fierce, public hospitals are confronted with challenges in orientation and operations. This study measured changes in the operational efficiency of public and their competitors, non-public hospitals, in Taiwan. This study considered differences in technology and scale between public and non-public hospitals and adopted the quality-incorporating metafrontier Malmquist productivity index to analyze inputs, outputs, and quality achievements of hospitals. The data consisted of 40 public hospitals and 79 non-public hospitals in Taiwan during the period 2008–2014. This study measured productivity growth and quality changes. Moreover, it further identified technological gaps and quality gaps in different types of hospitals with respect to the metafrontier. At the same time, comparisons of changes in quality between public and non-public hospitals were also examined. The empirical results showed that public hospitals were better than non-public ones in terms of productivity. Meanwhile, it was also found that most of the decomposition in productivity was higher in public hospitals than in non-public ones, especially in terms of improvements in technology and quality. This paper presented public hospitals outperformed non-public ones during the research period in spite of the fact that private hospitals had become larger and group-oriented. Therefore, public hospitals and regulators made appropriate adjustments and responses in the face of the pressure of competition in the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 2011, Ministry of Health and Welfare prosecuted that three state-owned hospitals in Keelung, Taipei and Taoyuan helped some enterprises win the bid of purchase of medical equipment through illegal bidding. In the case, a total fund worthy of NTD 640 million went to the enterprises. In 2014, there was a scandal that a state-owned hospital suffered a financial loss of NTD 4.81 million but distributed an allowance worthy of NTD 360 million without any specific criteria.

References

  1. Yen DY, Cheng CH (2016) Performance management of Taiwan’s national hospitals. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 15(1):187–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duggan MG (2000) Hospital ownership and public medical spending. Q J Econ 115(4):1343–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Folland ST, Hofler RA (2001) How reliable are hospital efficiency estimates? Exploiting the dual to homothetic production. Health Econ 10:683–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown HS (2003) Managed care and technical efficiency. Health Econ 12(2):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang H, Cheng MA, Das S (2004) Hospital ownership and operating efficiency: evidence from Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 159:513–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Herr A (2008) Cost and technical efficiency of German hospitals: does ownership matter? Health Econ 17:1057–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sloan FA (2000; chapter 21) Not-for-profit ownership and hospital behavior. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Handb Health Econ 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1141–1174

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farsi M, Filippini M (2006) An analysis of efficiency and productivity in Swiss hospitals. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 142(1):1–37

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farsi M, Filippini M (2008) Effects of ownership, subsidization and teaching activities on hospital costs in Switzerland. Health Econ 17:335–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen YC (2003) Changes in hospital performance after ownership conversions. Inquiry 40:217–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farsi M (2004) Changes in hospital quality after conversion in ownership status. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 4:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tiemann O, Schreyögg J (2012) Changes in hospital efficiency after privatization. Health Care Manag Sci 15(4):310–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang HH (1998) Determinants of hospital efficiency: the case of central government-owned hospitals in Taiwan. Omega 26(2):307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Villalonga B (2000) Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effects. J Econ Behav Organ 42:43–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McKay NL, Deily ME, Dorner FH (2003) Ownership and changes in hospital inefficiency. Inquiry 39:388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mutter RL, Rosko MD (2008) The impact of ownership on the cost-efficiency of U.S hospitals. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res 18:113–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrier GD, Trivitt JS (2013) Incorporating quality into the measurement of hospital efficiency: a double DEA approach. J Prod Anal 40:337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen KC, Chien LN, Hsu YH, Yu MM (2016) Metafrontier frameworks for studying hospital productivity growth and quality changes. Int J Qual Health Care 28(6):650–656

    Google Scholar 

  19. Callen JL (1991) Data envelopment analysis: partial survey and applications for management accounting. J Manag Account Res 3:35–56

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sherman HD, Zhu J (2006) Benchmarking with quality-adjusted DEA (Q-DEA) to seek lower-cost high-quality service: evidence from a U.S. bank application. Ann Oper Res 145:301–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Färe R, Grosskoph S, Roos P (1995) Productivity and quality changes in Swedish pharmacies. Int J Prod Econ 39:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Varabyova Y, Schreyögg J (2018) Integrating quality into the nonparametric analysis of efficiency: a simulation comparison of popular methods. Ann Oper Res 261:365–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang SJ, Hsiao HC, Huang LH (2011) Taiwan quality indicator project and hospital productivity growth. Omega 39(1):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee RH, Bott MJ, Gajewski B, Taunton RL (2009) Modeling efficiency at the process level: an examination of the care planning process in nursing homes. Health Serv Res 44(1):15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang J, Zeng W (2014) The trade-offs between efficiency and quality in the hospital production: some evidence from Shenzhen. China. China Econ Rev 31:166–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Du J, Wang J, Chen Y, Chou SY, Zhu J (2014) Incorporating health outcomes in Pennsylvania hospital efficiency: an additive super-efficiency DEA approach. Ann Oper Res 221(1):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometica 50(6):1393–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83

    Google Scholar 

  29. Oh DH, Lee JD (2010) A metafrontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity index. Empir Econ 38:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen KH, Yang HY (2011) A cross-country comparison of productivity growth using the generalised metafrontier Malmquist productivity index: with application to banking industries in Taiwan and China. J Prod Anal 35:197–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Donnell CJ, Rao DSP, Battese GE (2008) Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empir Econ 34:231–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Battese GE, Rao DSP (2002) Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a stochastic Metafrontier function. Int J Bus Econ 1:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  33. Battese GE, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ (2004) A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. J Prod Anal 21:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ozcan YA, Luke RD, Haksever G (1992) Ownership and organizational performance; a comparison of technical efficiency across hospital types. Med Care 30:781–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shen YC, Eggleston K, Lau J, Schmid C (2007) Hospital ownership and financial performance: what explains the different findings in the empirical literature? Inquiry 44:41–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Carey K (2003) Hospital cost efficiency and system membership. Inquiry 40:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alexander JA, Weiner BJ, Griffith J (2006) Quality improvement and hospital financial performance. J Organ Behav 27:1003–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Valdmanis VG, Rosko MD, Mutter RL (2008) Hospital quality, efficiency, and input slack differentials. Health Serv Res 43:1830–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hilton RW (2005) Managerial accounting: creating value in dynamic business environment. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cleverly WO, Harvey RK (1992) Is there a link between hospital profit and quality? Health Care Financ Manag 46(9):40–45

    Google Scholar 

  41. Solá M, Prior D (2001) Measuring productivity and quality changes using data envelopment analysis: an application to catalan hospitals. Financ Account Manag 17(3):219–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ferrier G, Valdmanis V (1996) Rural hospital performance and its correlates. J Prod Anal 7:63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nayar P, Ozcan Y (2008) Data envelopment analysis comparison of hospital efficiency and quality. J Med Syst 32:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mutter R, Valdmanis V, Rosko M. High versus lower quality hospitals: a comparison of environmental characteristics and technical efficiency. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 2010; 10:134–153

  45. Ozcan YA, Luke RD (2011) Healthcare delivery restructuring and productivity change: assessing the veterans integrated service networks (VISNs) using Malmquist approach. Med Care Res Rev 68:20S–35S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lobo MSC, Ozcan YA, Silva ACM, Lins MPE, Fiszman R (2010) Financing reform and productivity change in Brazilian teaching hospitals: Malmquist approach. CEJOR 18(2):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ozcan YA, Luke RD (1993) A national study of the efficiency of hospital in urban markets. Health Serv Res 27:719–739

    Google Scholar 

  48. Narci HO, Ozcan YA, Sahin I, Tarcan M, Narci M (2015) An examination of competition and efficiency for hospital industry in Turkey. Health Care Manag Sci 18(4):407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lobo MSC, Ozcan YA, Lins MPE, Silva ACM, Fiszman R (2014) Determinants of efficiency for teaching hospitals in Brazil. Int J Healthc Manag 7(1):60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ozcan YA, Lynch JR (1992) Rural hospital closures: an inquiry to efficiency. In Scheffler R. M. and Rossiter, L.F. (eds.). Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res 13:205–224

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the University System of Taipei Joint Research Program, Taiwan (USTP-NTOU-TMU-105-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Li-Nien Chien or Ming-Miin Yu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, KC., Chen, HM., Chien, LN. et al. Productivity growth and quality changes of hospitals in Taiwan: does ownership matter?. Health Care Manag Sci 22, 451–461 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9465-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9465-3

Keywords

Navigation