Skip to main content
Log in

An in-depth discussion and illustration of partial least squares structural equation modeling in health care

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) has become more popular across many disciplines including health care. However, articles in health care often fail to discuss the choice of PLS-SEM and robustness testing is not undertaken. This article presents the steps to be followed in a thorough PLS-SEM analysis, and includes a conceptual comparison of PLS-SEM with the more traditional covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) to enable health care researchers and policy makers make appropriate choices. PLS-SEM allows for critical exploratory research to lay the groundwork for follow-up studies using methods with stricter assumptions. The PLS-SEM analysis is illustrated in the context of residential aged care networks combining low-level and high-level care. Based on the illustrative setting, low-level care does not make a significant contribution to the overall quality of care in residential aged care networks. The article provides key references from outside the health care literature that are often overlooked by health care articles. Choosing between PLS-SEM and CB-SEM should be based on data characteristics, sample size, the types and numbers of latent constructs modelled, and the nature of the underlying theory (exploratory versus advanced). PLS-SEM can become an indispensable tool for managers, policy makers and regulators in the health care sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee L, Petter S, Fayard D, Robinson S (2011) On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research. Int J Account Inf Syst 12:305–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub DW (2012) A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Q 36:iii–xiv

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci 40:414–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng DX, Lai F (2012) Using partial least squares in operations management research: a practical guideline and summary of past research. J Oper Manag 30:467–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufmann L, Gaeckler J (2015) A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research. J Purch Supply Manag 21:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. do Valle PO, Assaker G (2016) Using partial least squares structural equation modeling in tourism research: a review of past research and recommendations for future applications. J Travel Res 55(6):695–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Naranjo-Gil D (2009) Strategic performance in hospitals: the use of the balanced scorecard by nurse managers. Health Care Manag Rev 34(2):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eng C-J, Pai H-C (2015) Determinants of nursing competence of nursing students in Taiwan: the role of self-reflection and insight. Nurse Educ Today 35:450–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hendriks PHJ, Ligthart PEM, Schouteten RLJ (2016) Knowledge management, health information technology and nurses’ work engagement. Health Care Manage Rev 41(3):256–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Macinati MS, Rizzo MG (2016) Exploring the link between clinical managers involvement in budgeting and performance: insights from the Italian public health care sector. Health Care Manage Rev 41(3):213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schiffinger M, Latzke M, Steyrer J (2016) Two sides of the safety coin?: how patient engagement and safety climate jointly affect error occurrence in hospital units. Health Care Manage Rev 41(4):356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Waddimba AC, Beckman HB, Mahoney TL, Burgess Jr JF (2016) The Moderating Effect of Job Satisfaction on Physicians’ Motivation to Adhere to Financially Incentivized Clinical Practice Guidelines. Med. Care Res Rev, 1–30.

  13. Avkiran NK, McCrystal A (2014) Intertemporal analysis of organizational productivity in residential aged care networks: scenario analyses for setting policy targets. Health Care Manag Sci 17(2):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Pieper TM, Ringle CM (2012) The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Plan 45:320–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Henseler J, Dijkstra TK, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Diamantopoulos A, Straub DW, Ketchen DJ, Hair JF, Hult GTM, Calantone RJ (2014) Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013). Organ Res Methods 17:182–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lohmöller JB (1989) Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Wold HOA (1982) Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In: Jöreskog KG, Wold HOA (eds) Systems under indirect observations: Part II. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1–54

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract 19(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev 26(2):106–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Monecke A, Leisch F (2012) semPLS: structural equation modeling using partial least squares. J Stat Softw 48(3):1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jöreskog KG, Wold H (1982) The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: Historical and comparative aspects. In: Joreskog KG, Wold H (eds) Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction. Part I. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 263–270

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin Y-M, Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48:159–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing: Adv Int Mark 20:277–319

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gefen D, Rigdon EE, Straub D (2011) An update and extension of SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Q 35(2):iii–xiv

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sohn SY, Han HK, Jeon HJ (2007) Development of an air force warehouse logistics index to continuously improve logistics capabilities. CEJOR 183:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chin WW (2010) How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses. In: Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, vol. II). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 655–690

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Henseler J, Sarstedt M (2013) Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Comput Stat 28:565–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jöreskog KG (1979) Basic ideas of factor and component analysis. In: Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (eds) Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. University Press of America, New York, pp 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu WW, Lan LW, Lee YT (2012) Exploring the critical pillars and causal relations within the NRI: an innovative approach. European Journal of Operational Research 218:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Petter S, Straub DW, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q 31(4):623–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Barclay DW, Higgins CA, Thompson R (1995) The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as illustration. Technol Stud 2(2):285–309

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Acad Psychol Bull 112(1):155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Reinartz WJ, Haenlein M, Henseler J (2009) An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. Int J Res Mark 26(4):332–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Barosso C, Cerrion GC, Roldan JL (2010) Applying Maximum Likelihood and PLS on Different Sample Sizes: Studies on SERVQUAL Model and Employee Behavior Model. In: Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 427–447

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Lei P-W, Wu Q (2007) Introduction to structural equation modeling: issues and practical considerations. Educ Meas: Issues and Practice 26(3):33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker JM (2015) SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Bönningstedt

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2013) Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plan 46:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hwang H, Takane Y (2004) Generalized structured component analysis. Psychometrika 69(1):81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hwang H, Takane Y (2014) Generalized structured component analysis: A component-based approach to structural equation modeling. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Hwang H, Ho M-H, Lee J (2010) Generalized structured component analysis with latent interactions. Psychometrika 75(2):228–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Thiele K-O, Sarstedt M, Ringle MC (2015) Mirror, mirror on the wall. A comparative evaluation of new and established structural equation modeling methods. 2nd International Symposium on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling, Seville (Spain).

  43. Marcoulides GA, Chin WW, Saunders C (2009) A critical look at partial least squares modeling. MIS Q 33(1):171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rigdon E (forthcoming) Choosing PLS Path Modeling as Analytical Method in European Management Research: A Realist Perspective. Eur Manag J

  45. Richter NF, Sinkovics RR, Ringle CM, Schlägel C (2016) A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. Int Mark Rev 33(3):376–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Necmi Kemal Avkiran.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avkiran, N.K. An in-depth discussion and illustration of partial least squares structural equation modeling in health care. Health Care Manag Sci 21, 401–408 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-017-9393-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-017-9393-7

Keywords

JEL classification

MSC codes

Navigation