Abstract
A relatively new consideration in proton therapy planning is the requirement that the mix of patients treated from different categories satisfy desired mix percentages. Deviations from these percentages and their impacts on operational capabilities are of particular interest to healthcare planners. In this study, we investigate intelligent ways of admitting patients to a proton therapy facility that maximize the total expected number of treatment sessions (fractions) delivered to patients in a planning period with stochastic patient arrivals and penalize the deviation from the patient mix restrictions. We propose a Markov Decision Process (MDP) model that provides very useful insights in determining the best patient admission policies in the case of an unexpected opening in the facility (i.e., no-shows, appointment cancellations, etc.). In order to overcome the curse of dimensionality for larger and more realistic instances, we propose an aggregate MDP model that is able to approximate optimal patient admission policies using the worded weight aggregation technique. Our models are applicable to healthcare treatment facilities throughout the United States, but are motivated by collaboration with the University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute (UFPTI).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adan I, Vissers J (2002) Patient mix optimisation in hospital admission planning: a case study. Int J Oper Prod Manage 22(4):445–461
Agnetis A, Coppi A, Corsini M, Dellino G, Meloni C, Pranzo M (2012) Long term evaluation of operating theater planning policies. Oper Res Health Care 1(4):95–104
Agnetis A, Coppi A, Corsini M, Dellino G, Meloni C, Pranzo M (2014) A decomposition approach for the combined master surgical schedule and surgical case assignment problems. Health Care Manag Sci 17(1):49–59
American Cancer Society (2014) Cancer facts and figures 2014, http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/webcontent/acspc-042151.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2014
Andre D, Russell SJ (2002) State abstraction for programmable reinforcement learning agents. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp 119–125
Averill RF, Muldoon JH, Vertrees JC, Goldfield NI, Mullin RL, Fineran EC, Zhang MZ, Steinbeck B, Grant T (1993) The evolution of casemix measurement using diagnosis related groups (drgs). Wallingford 3M Health Information Systems
Bertsimas D, Demir R (2002) An approximate dynamic programming approach to multidimensional knapsack problems. Manag Sci 48(4):550–565
Bowers J, Mould G (2005) Ambulatory care and orthopaedic capacity planning. Health Care Manag Sci 8:41–47
Cayirli T, Veral E, Rosen H (2006) Designing appointment scheduling systems for ambulatory care services. Health Care Manag Sci 9:47–58
Ciavotta M, Dellino G, Meloni C, Pranzo M (2010) A rollout algorithmic approach for complex parallel machine scheduling in healthcare operations. In: Operations research for patient: centered health care delivery: proceedings of the XXXVI international ORAHS conference, vol 5, pp 316–324
Ciavotta M, Meloni C, Pranzo M (2009) Scheduling dispensing and counting in secondary pharmaceutical manufacturing. AIChE J 55(5):1161–1170
Conforti D, Guerriero F, Guido R (2008) Optimization models for radiotherapy patient scheduling. 4OR 6:263–278
Conforti D, Guerriero F, Guido R (2010) Non-block scheduling with priority for radiotherapy treatments. Eur J Oper Res 201:289–296
Dean T, Givan R, Leach S (1997) Model reduction techniques for computing approximately optimal solutions for markov decision processes. In: Proceedings of the 13th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, pp 124–131
Dearden R, Boutilier C (1997) Abstraction and approximate decision-theoretic planning. Artif Intell 89 (1):219–283
Dietterich TG (2000) Hierarchical reinforcement learning with the maxq value function decomposition. J Artif Intell Res 13(1):227–303
Gedik R (2011) Evaluating the capacity of a proton therapy facility. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Gedik R (2014) Large-scale solution approaches for healthcare and supply chain scheduling. Phd thesis, University of Arkansas
Gocgun Y, Bresnahan BW, Ghate A, Gunn ML (2011) A markov decision process approach to multi-category patient scheduling in a diagnostic facility. Artif Intell Med 53(2):73–81
Goitein M, Jermann M (2003) The relative costs of proton and x-ray radiation therapy. Clin Oncol 15:S37–S50
Heyman DP, Sobel MJ (2003) Stochastic models in operations research: stochastic optimization, vol 2. Courier Dover Publications
Kapadia AS, Vineberg SE, Rossi CD (1985) Predicting course of treatment in a rehabilitation hospital: a Markovian model. Comput OR 12(5):459–469
Kapamara T, Sheibani K, Haas O, Reeves C, Petrovic D (2006) A review of scheduling problems in radiotherapy. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on systems engineering (ICSE2006). Coventry University, UK, pp 201–207
Kerstiens J, Johnstone PA (2014) Proton therapy expansion under current united states reimbursement models. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89(2):235–240
Kolesar P (1970) A markovian model for hospital admission scheduling. Manag Sci 16(6):B384–B396
Li L, Walsh TJ, Littman ML (2006) Towards a unified theory of state abstraction for mdps. In: ISAIM
Men C (2009) Optimization models for radiation therapy: treatment planning and patient scheduling. University of Florida
Men C, Salari E, Romeijn HE, Klein SL, Li Z, Mendenhall NP, Palta JR (2008) Report of the strategic model. Technical report, University of Florida
Nunes LGN, de Carvalho SV, Rodrigues RdCM (2009) Markov decision process applied to the control of hospital elective admissions. Artif Intell Med 47(2):159–171
Peeters A, Grutters JP, Pijls-Johannesma M, Reimoser S, Ruysscher DD, Severens JL, Joore MA, Lambin P (2010) How costly is particle therapy? cost analysis of external beam radiotherapy with carbon-ions, protons and photons. Radiother Oncol 95(1):45– 53
Petrovic D, Castro E, Petrovic S, Kapamara T, Urquhart N (2013) Radiotherapy scheduling. In: Uyar AS, Ozcan E (eds) Automated scheduling and planning. Studies in computational intelligence, vol 505. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–189
Petrovic D, Morshed M, Petrovic S (2009) Genetic algorithm based scheduling of radiotherapy treatments for cancer patients. In: Combi C, Shahar Y, Abu-Hanna A (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5651. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–105
Pham DN, Klinkert A (2008) Surgical case scheduling as a generalized job shop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 185:1011–1025
Powell WB (2007) Approximate dynamic programming: solving the curses of dimensionality. Wiley
Powell WB (2009) What you should know about approximate dynamic programming. Nav Res Logist (NRL) 56(3):239–249
Powell WB, George A, Bouzaiene-Ayari B, Simao HP (2003) Approximate dynamic programming for high dimensional resource allocation problems. In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005 (IJCNN’05), vol 5. IEEE, pp 2989–2994
Powell WB, Simao HP, Bouzaiene-Ayari B (2012) Approximate dynamic programming in transportation and logistics: a unified framework. EURO J Transport Log 1(3):237–284
Salari E, Men C, Li Z, Mendenhall N, Palta J, Romeijn H. (2009) Su-ff-t-467: A new patient scheduling approach for proton therapy treatment delivery. Med Phys 36(6):2630–2630
Sauré A, Patrick J, Tyldesley S, Puterman ML (2012) Dynamic multi-appointment patient scheduling for radiation therapy. Eur J Oper Res 223(2):573–584
Schütz H-J, Kolisch R (2012) Approximate dynamic programming for capacity allocation in the service industry. Eur J Oper Res 218(1):239–250
Shelley W, Brundage M, Hayter C, Paszat L, Zhou S, Mackillop W (2000) A shorter fractionation schedule for postlumpectomy breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:1219– 1228
Sickinger S, Kolisch R (2009) The performance of a generalized Bailey–Welch rule for outpatient appointment scheduling under inpatient and emergency demand. Health Care Manag Sci 12(4):408–419
Sutton RS, Precup D, Singh S (1999) Between mdps and semi-mdps: A framework for temporal abstraction in reinforcement learning. Artif Intell 112(1):181–211
Yamada Y, Ackerman I, Franssen E, Mackenzie RG, Thomas G (1999) Does the dose fractionation schedule influence local control of adjuvant radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:99–104
Zhang NL, Zhang W (2001) Speeding up the convergence of value iteration in partially observable markov decision processes. J Artif Intell Res:29–51
Zietman A, Goitein M, Tepper JE (2010) Technology evolution: is it survival of the fittest? J Clin Oncol 28(27):4275– 4279
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gedik, R., Zhang, S. & Rainwater, C. Strategic level proton therapy patient admission planning: a Markov decision process modeling approach. Health Care Manag Sci 20, 286–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-016-9354-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-016-9354-6