Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How do strategic decisions and operative practices affect operating room productivity?

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical operating rooms are cost-intensive parts of health service production. Managing operating units efficiently is essential when hospitals and healthcare systems aim to maximize health outcomes with limited resources. Previous research about operating room management has focused on studying the effect of management practices and decisions on efficiency by utilizing mainly modeling approach or before-after analysis in single hospital case. The purpose of this research is to analyze the synergic effect of strategic decisions and operative management practices on operating room productivity and to use a multiple case study method enabling statistical hypothesis testing with empirical data. 11 hypotheses that propose connections between the use of strategic and operative practices and productivity were tested in a multi-hospital study that included 26 units. The results indicate that operative practices, such as personnel management, case scheduling and performance measurement, affect productivity more remarkably than do strategic decisions that relate to, e.g., units’ size, scope or academic status. Units with different strategic positions should apply different operative practices: Focused hospital units benefit most from sophisticated case scheduling and parallel processing whereas central and ambulatory units should apply flexible working hours, incentives and multi-skilled personnel. Operating units should be more active in applying management practices which are adequate for their strategic orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HFMA. (2005) Achieving operating room efficiency through process integration, Technical report, Health Care Financial Management Association Report. Available at: http://www.mckesson.com/static_files/McKesson.com/MPT/Documents/HFMAProcessIntegration.pdf

  2. Dexter F (2010) Bibliography: surgical services management. Available at: http://www.franklindexter.net/bibliography_SurgicalServices.htm

  3. Cardoen B, Demeulemeester E, Belien J (2010) Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review. Eur J Oper Res 201(3):921–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vissers JMH, Bertrand JWM, de Vries G (2001) A framework for production control in health care organisations. Prod Plan Control 12–6:591–604

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guerriero F, Guido R (2011) Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey. Health Care Manage Sci 14(1):89–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Machuca JAD, González-Zamora M, Aguilar-Escobar V (2007) Service operations management research. J Oper Manag 25(3):585–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardoen B, Demeulemeester E, Van der Hoeven J (2010) On the use of planning models in the operating theatre: results of a survey in Flanders. Int J Heal Plan Manag 25:400–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carey K, Burgess JF Jr, Young GJ (2008) Specialty and full-service hospitals: a comparative cost analysis. Heal Serv Res 43:1869–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berry M, Berry-Stölzle T, Schleppers A (2008) Operating room management and operating room productivity: the case of Germany. Health Care Manage Sci 11:228–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dexter F, Weih L, Gustafson R, Stegura L, Oldenkamp M, Wachtel R (2006) Observational study of operating room times for knee and hip replacement surgery at nine U.S. community hospitals. Health Care Manage Sci 9:325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dexter F, Macario A, Qian F, Traub RD (1999) Forecasting surgical groups’ total hours of elective cases for allocation of block time - Application of time series analysis to operating room management. Anesthesiology 91:1501–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dexter F, Macario A (2004) When to release allocated operating room time to increase operating room efficiency. Anesth Analg 98:758–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vollman T, Berry W, Whybark D, Jacobs F (2004) Manufacturing planning and control for supply chain management, 5th international edition. McGraw-Hill

  14. Butler TW, Karwan KR, Sweigart JR (1992) Multi-level strategic evaluation of hospital plans and decisions. J Oper Res Soc 43(7):665–675

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roth A, van Dierdonck R (1995) Hospital resource planning: concepts, feasibility, and framework. Prod Oper Manag 4(1):2–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dexter F, Epstein RH, Traub RD, Xiao Y (2004) Making management decisions on the day of surgery based on operating room efficiency and patient waiting times. Anesthesiology 101:1444–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peltokorpi A, Torkki P, Kämäräinen V, Hynynen M (2009) Improving economic efficiency of operating rooms: production planning approach. Int J Services Standards 5(3):199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmenner R (2004) Service businesses and productivity. Decis Sci 35(3):333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Skinner W (1974) The focused factory. Harv Bus Rev 52(3):113–121

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hyer N, Wemmerlöv U, Morris J (2009) Performance analysis of a focused hospital unit: The case of an integrated trauma center. J Oper Manag 27(3):203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stigler, George J (1958) The economies of scale. JL Econ 54

  22. Torkki P, Alho A, Peltokorpi A, Torkki M, Kallio P (2006) Managing urgent surgery as a process: case study of a trauma center. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 22:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Strum DP, Sampson AR, May JH, Vargas LG (2000) Surgeon and type of anesthesia predict variability in surgical procedure times. Anesthesiology 92:1454–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world: Based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. Rawson Associates, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buchanan D, Wilson B (1996) Re-engineering operating theatres: the perspective assessed. J Manage Med 10(4):57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Groves T (1973) Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41(4):617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Conrad D, Sales A, Liang S, Chaudhuri A, Maynard C, Pieper L, Weinstein L, Gans D, Piland N (2002) The impact of financial incentives on physician productivity in medical groups. Heal Serv Res 37(4):885–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Parvinen P, Kujala J, Lillrank P, Kouri J (2005) Managing process interventions in healthcare. A Question of Governance. HCTM Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, August 25–26, 2005

  29. Mieghem J (1998) Investment strategies for flexible resources. Manag Sci 44(8):1071–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bish E, Muriel A, Biller S (2005) Flexible capacity in a make-to-order environment. Manag Sci 51(2):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ballantine J, Brignall S, Modell S (1998) Performance measurement and management in public health services: a comparison of U.K. and Swedish practice. Manag Account Res 9:71–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goddard M, Mannion R, Smith P (2004) Studying the organization and delivery of health services: Enhancing performance in health care: a theoretical perspective on agency and the role of information. Routledge, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  33. Santibanez P, Begen M, Atkins D (2007) Surgical block scheduling in a system of hospitals: an application to resource and wait list management in a British Columbia health authority. Health Care Manage Sci 10:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Krupka D, Sandberg W (2006) Operating room design and its impact on operating room economics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19(2):185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lehtonen, J-M; Torkki, P; Peltokorpi, A; Moilanen, T (2009) How to increase productivity by improving scheduling in operating rooms? EUROMA conference Göteborg, Sweden, June 2009

  36. Haupt M, Bekes C, Brilli R, Carl L, Gray A, Jastremski M, Naylor D, Rudis M, Spevetz A, Wedel S, Horst M (2003) Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care. Crit Care Med 31(11):2677–2683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schroeder RG, Flynn BB (2001) High performance manufacturing: global perspectives. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Peltokorpi A, Lehtonen J-M, Kujala J, Kouri J (2008) Operating room cost management in cardiac surgery: a simulation study. Int J Healthc Technol Manag 9(1):60–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Masursky D, Dexter F, Garver M, Nussmeier N (2009) Incentive payments to academic anesthesiologists for late afternoon work did not influence turnover times. Anesth Analg 108:1622–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tarquinio GT, Dittus RS, Byrne DW, Kaiser A, Neilson E (2003) Effects of performance-based compensation and faculty track on the clinical activity, research portfolio, and teaching mission of a large academic department of medicine. Acad Med 78:690–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Abouleish A, Apfelbaum J, Prough D, Williams J, Roskoph J, Johnston W, Whitten C (2005) The prevalence and characteristics of incentive plans for clinical productivity among academic anesthesiology programs. Anesth Analg 100:493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. St. Jacques P, Patel N, Higgins M (2004) Improving anesthesiologist performance through profiling and incentives. J Clin Anesth 16:523–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Masursky D, Dexter F, Nussmeier N (2008) Operating room nursing directors’ influence on anesthesia group operating room productivity. Anesth Analg 107:1989–1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hyer N, Wemmerlöv U (2001) Reorganizing the factory: competing through cellular manufacturing. Productivity Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  45. Testi A, Tanfani E, Torre G (2007) A three-phase approach for operating theatre schedules. Health Care Manage Sci 10:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Denton B, Viapiano J, Vogl A (2007) Optimization of surgery sequencing and scheduling decisions under uncertainty. Health Care Manage Sci 10(1):13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sanjay P, Dodds A, Miller E, Arumugam PJ, Woodward A (2007) Cancelled elective operations: an observational study from a district general hospital. J Heal Organ Manag 21(1):54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Marjamaa R (2007) Towards operating room management (in Finnish, abstract available in English) Ph.D. Thesis. University of Helsinki. Finland

  49. Macario A (2006) (2006) Are your hospital operating rooms “efficient”?: A scoring system with eight performance indicators. Anesthesiology 105:237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Brenn BR, Reilly JS, Deutsch ES, Hetrick MH, Cook SC (2003) Analysis of efficiency of common otolaryngology operations: comparison of operating room vs short procedure room in a pediatric tertiary hospital. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:435–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BIT Research Centre, Aalto University, PO Box 15500, FI-00076, Aalto, Finland

    Antti Peltokorpi

Authors
  1. Antti Peltokorpi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antti Peltokorpi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peltokorpi, A. How do strategic decisions and operative practices affect operating room productivity?. Health Care Manag Sci 14, 370–382 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-011-9173-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-011-9173-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation