Advertisement

Health Care Management Science

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 233–242 | Cite as

Costs and prices for inpatient care in England: Mirror twins or distant cousins?

  • David EpsteinEmail author
  • Anne Mason
Article

Abstract

The National Health Service (NHS) in England is introducing a national cost-per-case tariff system for the reimbursement of hospital services. Unlike most other countries with similar payment mechanisms, hospitals in England will have few alternative sources of income once the tariff system is fully implemented. This new financial regime generates powerful incentives for change, but exposes purchasers and providers to considerable financial risks. This paper examines the structure of the tariff. We describe how costs are determined, analyse the extent to which prices reflect costs, and review the results of an early evaluation of the system.

Keywords

Hospital charges Hospital costs Hospital information systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stevens S (2004) Reform strategies for the English NHS. Health Aff 23:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Binley’s (2005) Binley’s NHS guide Summer–Autumn 2005. Beechwood, EssexGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. www.dh.gov.uk
  4. 4.
    Department of Health (2004) Independent sector treatment centre market sustainability analysis. www.dh.gov.uk
  5. 5.
    The National Audit Office and The Audit Commission (2006) Financial management in the NHS: NHS (England) summarised accounts 2005–2006. London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McGuire T (2004) In: Sussex J, Street A (eds) Activity based funding for hospitals: English policy, international experience. Office of Health Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Appleby J, Jobanputra R (2004) Payment by results: the NHS financial revolution. New Econ 11:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Department of Health (2005) Code of conduct for payment by results. www.dh.gov.uk
  9. 9.
    National Casemix Office (1997) Version 3 healthcare resource group documentation set. www.ic.nhs.uk. Winchester, National Casemix Office
  10. 10.
    Miraldo M, Goddard M, Smith PC (2005) The incentive effects of payment by results. Report to Dr Foster Ltd. York, Centre for Health EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    HMSO (2003) The community care (Delayed Discharges etc) act. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Department of Health (2005) NHS costing manual. www.dh.gov.uk
  13. 13.
    Department of Health (2005) Reference costs collection and guidance. www.dh.gov.uk
  14. 14.
    Department of Health (2005) Payment by results: a step by step guide to the calculation of the tariff. Version 1.0. www.dh.gov.uk
  15. 15.
    Street A (2004) Activity based funding for hospitals: English policy, international experience. In: Sussex J, Street A (eds) Office of Health Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mason A (2005) Does the English NHS have a health benefit basket? European Journal of Health Economics 6(Suppl 1):18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilson R, Davies R, Green A, Owen D, Elias P (2002) Spatial variations in labour costs: 2001 Review of the staff market forces factor. www.warwick.ac.uk. Department of Health and Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick
  18. 18.
    Department of Health (2004) Hospital episode statistics for England 2003/04. www.dh.gov.uk
  19. 19.
    Department of Health (2005) Implementing payment by results: technical guidance 2005/2006. www.dh.gov.uk
  20. 20.
    Jacobs R, Dawson D (2003) Variation in unit costs of hospitals in the English national health service. J Health Serv Res Policy 8:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Audit Commission (2005) Early lessons from payment by results. http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/. London, Audit Commission
  22. 22.
    Rogers R, William S, Jarman B, Aylin P (2005) HRG drift and payment by results: Dr Foster’s case notes. Br Med J 330:563Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mannion R (2005) Practice-based budgeting: lessons from the past; prospects for the future. http://www.york.ac.uk/healthsciences/pubs/HPM11final.pdf. York, Centre for Health Economics, University of York
  24. 24.
    Dusheiko M, Gravelle H, Jacobs R, Smith P (2006) The effect of financial incentives on gatekeeping doctors: evidence from a natural experiment. J Health Econ 25:449–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Health Service Journal (2005, Nov 17) SHA suspends system as debt soars.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Department of Health (2005) In year financial forecast 2005–2006. Ref 5892. www.dh.gov.uk
  27. 27.
    Department of Health (2000) Comprehensive critical care: a review of adult critical care services. www.dh.gov.uk
  28. 28.
    Department of Health (2002) Specialised services national definition set. www.dh.gov.uk

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Health EconomicsUniversity of YorkEnglandUK

Personalised recommendations