Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing Mortality Rates from Dubious Data—When to Stop Doing Statistics and Start Doing Mathematics

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When trying to assess surgical outcomes at a particular centre, it is important to take account of case mix in terms of the types of operation performed. This is because those centres that undertake a disproportionately high number of complex operations might well be expected to have higher mortality rates than other centres whose case mix is more routine. From a statistical viewpoint, such case-mix adjustment is relatively straightforward if there are reliable risk estimates for different operation types. However this may not be the case and the risk estimates may have to be derived from several different sources which may not themselves be in agreement. Here, standard case-mix adjustment methods are no longer applicable and alternative analysis methods need to be used to make use of such unreliable risk estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. The Inquiry into the management of care of children receiving complex heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary, http://www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk (2000).

  2. 2. J. Lovegrove, O. Valencia, T. Treasure, C Sherlaw-Johnson and S. Gallivan, Monitoring the result of cardiac surgery by variable life adjusted display (VLAD), Lancet 350 (1997) 1128–1130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3. J. Lovegrove, C. Sherlaw-Johnson and S. Gallivan, Monitoring the performance of cardiac surgeons, Journal of the Operational Research Society 50(7) (1998) 684–689.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4. C. Sherlaw-Johnson, J. Lovegrove, T. Treasure and S. Gallivan, Likely variations in perioperative mortality associated with cardiac surgery: When does high mortality reflect bad practice? Heart 84 (2000) 79–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5. B. Keogh and R. Kinsman, National adult cardiac data base report 1990–2000 The Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, 2000.

  6. 6. T. Treasure, O. Valencia, C. Sherlaw-Johnson and S. Gallivan, Surgical performance measurement, Health Care Management Science 5 (2002) 243–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7. D.J. Spiegelhalter, S. Evans, P. Aylin, and J. Murray, Overview of statistical evidence presented to the Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry concerning the nature and outcomes of paediatric cardiac surgical services at Bristol relative to other specialist centres from 1984 to 1995, in: The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. Learning from Bristol. The Report of the Public Inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995 (The Stationery Office, London, Annex B, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, UK

    Steve Gallivan

Authors
  1. Steve Gallivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Gallivan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallivan, S. Assessing Mortality Rates from Dubious Data—When to Stop Doing Statistics and Start Doing Mathematics. Health Care Manage Sci 8, 237–241 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-005-2015-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-005-2015-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation