Skip to main content

Simulating the Allocation of Organs for Transplantation


The demand for donated organs greatly exceeds supply and many candidates die awaiting transplantation. Policies for allocating deceased donor organs may address equity of access and medical efficacy, but typically must be implemented with incomplete information. Simulation-based analysis can inform the policy process by predicting the likely effects of alternative policies on a wide variety of outcomes of interest. This paper describes a family of simulations developed by the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and initial experience in the application of one member of this family, the Liver Simulated Allocation Model (LSAM).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Quick Facts (University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. University Renal Research and Education Association, United network for organ sharing, Annual report of the U.S. organ procurement and transplantation network and the scientific registry of transplant recipients: Transplant data 1992–2001, Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Special Programs, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MD (2003).

  3. United Network for Organ Sharing, Allocation of Livers, Proposed Amended UNOS Policy 3.6, Approved by OPTN/UNOS Board of Governors, November 15, 2001, revised February 1, 2002 Richmond, VA (2002).

  4. D.H. Howard, Dynamic analysis of liver allocation policies, Medical Decision Making 21 (2001) 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Ratliffe, T. Young, M. Buxton, T. Eldabi, R. Paul, A. Burroughs, G. Papatheodoridis and K. Rolles, A simulation modeling approach to evaluating alternative policies for the management of the waiting list for liver transplantation, Health Care Management Science 4 (2001) 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.M. Harper, S.E. Taranto, E.B. Edwards and O.P. Daily, An update on a successful simulation project: The UNOS liver allocation model, in: Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Piscataway, NJ (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, NJ, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.A.B. Pritsker, Life and death decisions: Organ transplantation allocation policy analysis, OR/MS Today, August (1998).

  8. A.A.B. Pritsker , Organ transplantation policy evaluation, in: Proceedings of the 1995 Winter Simulation Conference, eds. C. Alexopoulos, K. Kang, W. Lilegdon and D. Goldsman (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.A.B. Pritsker, O.P. Daily and K.D. Pritsker, Using simulation to craft a national organ transplantation policy, in: Proceedings, 1996 Western Multiconference of the Society for Computer Simulation – Simulation in the Medical Sciences (The Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.A.B. Pritsker , Organ transplantation modeling and analysis, in: Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, Piscataway, NJ, eds. J.M. Charnes, D.J. Morrice, D.T. Brunner and J.J. Swain (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. United Network for Organ Sharing, Report of the UNOS Distribution Committee to the UNOS Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee, Richmond, VA (2000).

  12. University Renal Research and Education Association, User Manual for LSAM, Version 1.2 (Ann Arbor, MI, 2002).

  13. R.N.H. Pugh, I.M. Murray-Lyon, J.L. Dawson, M.C. Pictioni and R. Williams, Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices, British Journal of Surgery 60 (1973) 646–649.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.S. Kamath, R.H. Wiesner, M. Malinchoc, W. Kermers, T.M. Therneau, C.L. Kosberg, G. D’Amico, E.R. Dickson and W.R. Kim, A model to predict survival in patients with end-state liver disease, Hepatology 33 (2001) 464–470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. R.M. Merion, R.A. Wolfe, D.M. Dykstra, A.B. Leichtman, B. Gillespie and P.J. Held, Longitudinal assessment of mortality risk among candidates for liver transplantation, Liver Transplantation 9 (2003) 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.V. McDiarmid, R. Anand, A.S. Lindblad and the Principal Investigators and Institutions of the Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) Research Group, Development of a pediatric end-stage liver disease score to predict poor outcome in children awaiting liver transplantation, Transplantation 74 (2002) 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  17. United Network for Organ Sharing, Liver policy outcomes encouraging at six months; some adjustments recommended (Press Release, Richmond, VA, November 13, 2002).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, D., Waisanen, L., Wolfe, R. et al. Simulating the Allocation of Organs for Transplantation. Health Care Manage Sci 7, 331–338 (2004).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • transplantation
  • simulation
  • organ allocation
  • organ distribution
  • end-stage liver disease
  • liver transplant