Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 4–12 | Cite as

Relational Ethics for Public Health: Interpreting Solidarity and Care

  • Bruce JenningsEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This article defends ‘relational theorizing’ in bioethics and public health ethics and describes its importance. It then offers an interpretation of solidarity and care understood as normatively patterned and psychologically and socially structured modes of relationality; in a word, solidarity and care understood as ‘practices.’ Solidarity is characterized as affirming the moral standing of others and their membership in a community of equal dignity and respect. Care is characterized as paying attention to the moral (and mortal) being of others and their needs, suffering, and vulnerability. The wager of relational theorizing in health care and public health is that substantive ethical visions of solidarity and care will provide support for more just and egalitarian health care and public health policies.

Keywords

Bioethics Public health ethics Solidarity Care Ethical theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this article was presented as The Third Annual Jonathan Montgomery Lecture at the Centre for Health, Ethics, and Law, University of Southampton, on 15 January 2018. A more extended discussion of solidarity and care is presented in Jennings [11].

References

  1. 1.
    Arras, J. D. (2017). Methods in bioethics: The way we reason now. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brody, H. (2009). The future of bioethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Callahan, D. (2012). In search of the good: A life in bioethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Code, L. (2006). Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fox, R. C., & Swazey, J. (2008). Bioethics observed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political and global. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hutto, D. D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jennings, B. (2015). Right relation and right recognition in public health ethics: Thinking through the republic of health. Public Health Ethics, 9(2), 168–177.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jennings, B. (2016). Reconceptualizing autonomy: The relational turn in bioethics. Hastings Center Report, 46(3), 11–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jennings, B. (2018). Solidarity and care as relational practices. Bioethics.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jennings, B., & Dawson, A. (2015). Solidarity in the moral imagination of bioethics. Hastings Center Report, 45(5), 31–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality and dependency. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lindemann, H., Verkerk, M., & Walker, M. U. (Eds.). (2009). Naturalized bioethics: Toward responsible knowing and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nedelsky, J. (2011). Law’s relations: A relational theory of self, autonomy, and law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2011). Solidarity: Reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics. London: The Nuffield Council.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2017). Solidarity in Biomedicine and Beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silva, D. S., & Viens, A. M. (2015). Infection control measures and debts of gratitude. American Journal of Bioethics, 15, 55–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor, C. (1995). Philosophical arguments (pp. 165–180). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ter Meulen, R. (2017). Solidarity and justice in health and social care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tronto, J. (1994). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tronto, J. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equity, and justice. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walker, A. D. M. (1988). Political obligation and the argument from gratitude. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 17, 191–211.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wren, T. E. (Ed.). (1990). The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences (pp. 224–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Hastings CenterGarrisonUSA
  2. 2.Center for Biomedical Ethics and SocietyVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations