Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 114–137 | Cite as

Medical Need: Evaluating a Conceptual Critique of Universal Health Coverage

  • Lynette ReidEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Some argue that the concept of medical need is inadequate to inform the design of a universal health care system—particularly an institutional (universal, comprehensive) rather than a residual (minimalist, safety net) system. They argue that the concept (a) contradicts the idea of comprehensiveness; (b) leads to unsustainable expenditures; (c) is too indeterminate for policy; and (d) supports only a prioritarian distribution (and therefore a residual system). I argue (a) that ‘comprehensive’ understood as ‘including the full continuum of care’ and ‘medically necessary’ understood as ‘prioritized by medical criteria’ are not contradictory, and (b) that UHC is a solution to the problem of sustainability, not its cause. Those who criticize ‘medical need’ for indeterminacy (c) are not transparent about the source (ethical, semantic, political, or other) of their commitment to their standards of determinacy: they promote standards that are higher than is necessary for legitimate policy, ignoring opportunity costs. Furthermore, the indeterminacy of concepts affects all risk-sharing systems and all systems that rely on medical standard of care. I then argue that (d) the concept of need in itself does not imply a minimal sufficientist standard or a prioritarian distribution; neither does the idea of legitimate public policy dictate that public services be minimalist. The policy choice for a system of health care that is comprehensive and offers as good care as can be achieved when delivered on equal terms and conditions for all is a coherent option.

Keywords

Medical need Resource allocation Health systems Universal health care Public health ethics Health policy/ethics 

References

  1. 1.
    Broome, J. (1984). Uncertainty and fairness. The Economic Journal, 94, 624–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broome, J. (1990). Fairness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 91, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broome, J. (1994). Fairness versus doing the most good. The Hastings Center Report, 24, 36–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canada Health Act, RSC 1985, c C-6. Retrieved October 18, 2015 from http://canlii.ca/t/51w33.
  5. 5.
    Crisp, R. (2002). Treatment according to need: Justice and the British National Health Service. In R. Rhodes, M. P. Battin, & A. Silvers (Eds.), Medicine and social justice: Essays on the distribution of health care (pp. 134–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crisp, R. (2003). Equality, priority, and compassion. Ethics, 113, 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Culyer, A. (1998). Need—Is a consensus possible? Journal of Medical Ethics, 24, 77–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Culyer, A. J., & Wagstaff, A. (1993). Equity and equality in health and health care. Journal of Health Economics, 12, 431–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dawson, A., & Verweij, M. (2012). Solidarity: A moral concept in need of clarification. Public Health Ethics, 5, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dworkin, R. (1993). Justice in the distribution of health care. McGill Law Journal, 38, 883–898.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flood, C. M. (2000). Arguments in economics and justice for government intervention in health insurance and health services markets. In International health care reform: A legal, economic, and political analysis (pp. 15–40). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flood, C. M., & Archibald, T. (2001). The illegality of private health care in Canada. CMAJ, 164, 825–830.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flood, C. M., & Haugan, A. (2010). Is Canada odd? A comparison of European and Canadian approaches to choice and regulation of the public/private divide in health care. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5, 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gunson, D. (2009). Solidarity and the universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 34, 241–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall, E. (1964). Royal commission on health services: Volume 1. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hall, E. (1965). Royal commission on health services: Volume 2. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harris, J. (1988). More and better justice. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series, 23, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hasman, A., Hope, T., & Østerdal, L. P. (2006). Health care need: Three interpretations. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 23, 145–156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heath, J. (2011). Three normative models of the welfare state. Public Reason, 3, 13–43.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Houtepen, R., & ter Meulen, R. (2000). New types of solidarity in the European welfare state. Health Care Analysis, 8, 329–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Juth, N. (2015). Challenges for principles of need in health care. Health Care Analysis, 23, 73–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kolers, A. (2012). Dynamics of solidarity. Journal of Political Philosophy, 20, 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kolers, A. (2014). The priority of solidarity to justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31, 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krishnamurthy, M. (2013). Political solidarity, justice and public health. Public Health Ethics, 6, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krogsbøll, L. T., Jørgensen, K. J., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2013). General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease. JAMA, 309(23), 2489–2490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lehtonen, T., & Liukko, J. (2015). Producing solidarity, inequality and exclusion through insurance. Res Publica, 21, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meadowcroft, J. (2015). Just healthcare? The moral failure of single-tier basic healthcare. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 40, 152–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nord, E., Richardson, J., Street, A., Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (1995). Who cares about cost? Does economic analysis impose or reflect social values? Health Policy, 34, 79–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Persad, G., Wertheimer, A., & Emanuel, E. J. (2009). Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. Lancet, 373, 423–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ponka, D. (2014). The periodic health examination in adults. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 186(16), 1245.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2011). Solidarity: Reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Retrieved from http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/solidarity/.
  32. 32.
    Reid, L. (2016). Answering the empirical challenge to arguments for universal health coverage based in health equity. Public Health Ethics (advance access).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reid, L. (2016). Concierge, wellness, and block fee models in primary care: Ethical and regulatory concerns. Health Care Analysis (this issue).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reid, L. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: Precarious solidarity: Preferential access in Canadian health care. Health Care Analysis (this issue).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schut, F. T., & van de Ven, W. P. (2011). Effects of purchaser competition in the Dutch health system: Is the glass half full or half empty? Health Economics, Policy and Law, 6, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sen, A. (2002). Why health equity? Health Economics, 11, 659–666.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sen, A. (2009). Capitalism beyond the crisis. The New York Review of Books, 56(5), 27–30.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Snyder, J., Johnston, R., Crooks, V., Morgan, J., & Adams, K. (2016). How medical tourism enables preferential access to care: Four patterns from the Canadian context. Health Care Analysis (this issue).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tobin, J. (1970). On limiting the domain of inequality. Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vertes, J. Z. (2013). Alberta Health Services preferential access inquiryFinal report. Calgary. Retrieved from http://healthaccessinquiry.com/.
  41. 41.
    Wagstaff, A. (1991). QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off. Journal of Health Economics, 10, 21–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weale, A. (1990). Equality, social solidarity, and the welfare state. Ethics, 100, 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wiggins, D. (1998). Needs, values, truth: Essays in the philosophy of value. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1987).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Williams, A. (1995). Economics, QALYs and medical ethics: A health economist’s perspective. Health Care Analysis, 3, 221–226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BioethicsDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations