Health Care Analysis

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 340–365 | Cite as

Challenging the Moral Status of Blood Donation

Original Article

Abstract

The World Health Organisation encourages that blood donation becomes voluntary and unremunerated, a system already operated in the UK. Drawing on public documents and videos, this paper argues that blood donation is regarded and presented as altruistic and supererogatory. In advertisements, donation is presented as something undertaken for the benefit of others, a matter attracting considerable gratitude from recipients and the collecting organisation. It is argued that regarding blood donation as an act of supererogation is wrongheaded, and an alternative account of blood donation as moral obligation is presented. Two arguments are offered in support of this position. First, the principle of beneficence, understood in a broad consequentialist framework obliges donation where the benefit to the recipient is large and the cost to the donor relatively small. This argument can be applied, with differing levels of normativity, to various acts of donation. Second, the wrongness of free riding requires individuals to contribute to collective systems from which they benefit. Alone and in combination these arguments present moral reasons for donation, recognised in communication strategies elsewhere. Research is required to evaluate the potential effects on donation of a campaign which presents blood donation as moral obligation, but of wider importance is the recognition that other-regarding considerations in relation to our own as well as others’ health result in a range not only of choices but also of obligations.

Keywords

Blood donation Organ donation Altruism Obligation Television advertisements 

References

  1. 1.
    Akl, E. A., Oxman, A. D. Herrin, J., Vist, G. E. Terrenato, I., Sperati, F., Costiniuk, C., Blank, D. Schünemann, H. (2011) Framing of health information messages (Review) The Cochrane library, December 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Red Cross. (undated). FAQs about donating blood. [on line] http://www.redcrossblood.org/hosting-blood-drive/ultimate-guide-hosting-blood-drive/recruitment-strategies-tips. Last accessed 14th March 2012.
  3. 3.
    Arnold, E., & Lane, S. (2011). Qualitative research in transfusion medicine. Transfusion Medicine, 21(5), 291–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baron, M. (1987). Kantian ethics and supererogation. The Journal of Philosophy, 84(5), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and Prosocial behaviour: Helping when it costs you. Psychological Science, 17, 319–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baumeister, R. F., & Ilko, S. A. (1995). Shallow gratitude: Public and private acknowledgements of external help in accounts of success. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16(12), 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2008) Principles of Biomedical Ethics (sixth edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bednall, T. C., & Bove, L. L. (2011). Donating blood: A meta-analytic review of self-reported motivators and deterrents. Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 25(4), 317–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Belda Suarez, I. M., Fernandez-Montoya, A., Rodriguez Fernandez, A., Lopez-Berrio, A., & Cillero-Penuela, M. (2004). How regular blood donors explain their behaviour. Transfusion, 44, 1441–1446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bennett, R. (2007). Should we criminalise HIV transmission? In C. A. Erin & S. Ost (Eds.), The criminal justice system and health care, Chap. 13 (pp. 225–236). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brassington, I. (2007). John Harris’ argument for a duty to research. Bioethics, 21(3), 160–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brassington, I. (2011). Defending the duty to research? Bioethics, 25(1), 21–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brennan, L., & Binney, W. (2010). Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of Business Research, 63, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buyx, A. (2009). Blood donation, payment and non-cash incentives: Classical questions drawing renewed interest. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, 36, 329–339.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cabinet Office. (2010). Applying behavioural insight to health. London: Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cabinet Office. (2011). Behavioural insights team annual update 2010–11. London: Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carter, M. C., Wilson, J., Redpath, G. S., Hayes, P., & Mitchell, C. (2011). Donor recruitment in the 21st Century: Challenges and lessons learnt in the first decade. Transfusion and Apheresis Science, 45, 31–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan, S., & Harris, J. (2009). Free riders and pious sons—Why scientific research remains obligatory. Bioethics, 23(3), 161–171.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clouser, K. D., & Gert, B. (1990). A critique of principlism. The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 15(2), 219–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coggon, J. (2009). Public health, responsibility and English law: Are there such things as no smoke without ire or needless clean needles? Medical Law Review, 17, 127–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coggon, J. (2012). What makes health public? A critical evaluation of moral, legal and political claims in public health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Condie, S. J., Warner, W. K., & Gillman, D. C. (1976). Getting blood from collective turnips: Volunteer donation in mass blood drives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 290–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cullity, G. (1995). Moral free riding. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Kort, W. (Ed). (2010). Donor management manual. Nijmegen; Domain Project. [on line] http://www.domaine-europe.eu/ManualPDF/tabid/115/Default.aspx. Last accessed 14th March 2012.
  25. 25.
    Department of Health. (2009). Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment (2nd ed.). London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Department of Health. (2010). The NHS constitution. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Devine, D., Goldman, M., Engelfriet, C. P., Reesink, H. W., Hetherington, C., Hall, S., et al. (2007). Donor recruitment research. Vox Sanguinis, 93, 250–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Driver, J. (1992). The Suberogatory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70(3), 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eaton, S. (1998). The subtle politics of organ donation; a proposal. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26, 166–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Edwards, S. D. (2008). Discussion document; Introduction of an opt out (presumed consent) system in the context of Organ Transplantation. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government. [on line] http://wales.gov.uk/dhss/publications/health/guidance/discussion/discussionconsente.pdf;jsessionid=xTPHTTZL2C1XgCJC1GNxKQvsKyBRrb3J2lQqQJXhWw6pLxQrcfhV!1374374152?lang=en (last accessed 14th March 2012).
  31. 31.
    Fabre, C. (2006). Whose body is it anyway?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Farrell, A.-M. (2006). Is the gift still good? Examining the politics and regulation of blood safety in the European Union. Medical Law Review, 14, 155–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Farrugia, A., Penrod, J., & Bult, J. M. (2010). Payment, compensation and replacement—The ethics and motivation of dlood and plasma donation. Vox Sanguinis, 99, 202–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ferguson, P. R. (2011). ‘Smoke gets in your eyes…’: The criminalisation of smoking in enclosed public places, the harm principle and the limits of the criminal sanction. Legal Studies, 31(2), 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ferguson, E., Farrell, K., & Lawrence, C. (2008). Blood donation is an act of benevolence rather than altruism. Health Psychology, 27(3), 327–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ferguson, E., Atsma, F., de Kort, W., & Veldhuizen, I. (2012). Exploring the pattern of blood donor beliefs in first time, novice, and experienced donors: Differentiating reluctant altruism, pure altruism, impure altruism and warm glow. Transfusion, 52(2), 343–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gill, P., & Lowes, L. (2008). Gift exchange and organ donation: Donor and recipient experiences of live related kidney transplantation. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 1607–1617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gillespie, T. W., & Hillyer, C. D. (2002). Blood donors and factors impacting the blood donation decision. Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 16(2), 115–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gillum, R. F., & Masters, K. S. (2010). Religiousness and blood donation; findings from a national survey. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(2), 163–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goette, L., Stutzer, A., Yavuzcan, G., & Frey, B. M. (2009). Free cholesterol testing as a motivation device in blood donations: Evidence from field experiments. Transfusion, 49, 524–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Goette, L., Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. M. (2010). Prosocial motivation and blood donations: A survey of the empirical literature. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, 37, 149–154.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hardin, R. (2007). David Hume: Moral and political theorist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Harris, J. (2005). Scientific research is a moral duty. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 242–248.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are there any natural rights? The Philosophical Review, 64(2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Heyd, D. (1982). Supererogation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    House of Commons Health Committee. (2005). Smoking in Public Places; First report of session 2005–2006. London; The Stationary Office limited. [on line]. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmhealth/485/485.pdf. Last accessed 14th March 2012.
  47. 47.
    Hume, D. (1748 [2007]). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hupfer, M. E. (2006). Helping me, helping you: Self-referencing and gender roles in donor advertising. Transfusion, 46, 996–1005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Institute of Innovation and Improvement. (2010). Consent/authorisation for donation after brain-stem death. [on line] http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/ukt/about_us/professional_development_programme/pdf/Consent_and_Authorisation.pdf. Last accessed 14th March 2012.
  50. 50.
    International Society of Blood Transfusion. (2000). A code of ethics for blood donation and transfusion. Amsterdam: International Society of Blood Transfusion.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    International Society of Blood Transfusion. (undated). Aims and objectives. [on line] http://www.isbtweb.org/about-isbt/isbt-partners/ifbdo/ last accessed 14th March 2012.
  52. 52.
    Jarvis, R. (1995). Join the club: A modest proposal to increase the availability of donor organs. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21, 199–204.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    John, S. (2011). Expert testimony and epistemological free-riding: The MMR controversy. The Philosophical Quarterly, 61(244), 496–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lavee, J., Ashkenazi, T., Gurnham, G., & Steinberg, D. (2010). A new law for allocation of donor organs in Israel. The Lancet, 375, 1131–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lemmens, K. P. H., Abraham, C., Ruiter, R. A. C., Veldhuizen, I. J. T., Bos, A. E. R., & Schaalma, H. P. (2008). Identifying blood donors willing to help with recruitment Vox Sanguinis, 95, 211–217.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Maghsudlu, M., & Nasizadeh, S. (2011). Iranian blood donors’ motivations and their influencing factors. Transfusion Medicine, 21, 247–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Martin, S. J., Bassi, S., & Rees, R. D. (2012). Commitments, norms and custard creams—A social influence approach to reducing did not attends (DNAs). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105(3), 101–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Masser, B. M., White, K. M., Hyde, M. K., & Terry, D. J. (2008). The psychology of blood donation: Current research and future directions. Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 22(93), 215–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    McCulloch, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    McKie, J., & Richardson, J. (2003). The rule of rescue. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 2407–2419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mellema, G. (1991). Beyond the call of duty. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mulgan, T. (2001). The demands of consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mullin, A. (2011). Gratitude and caring labour. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(2), 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Nagel, T. (1970). The possibility of altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    National Aids Control Programme. (2007). Voluntary Blood Donation Programme. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and family Welfare, Government of India.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    New, C. (1974). Saints, heroes and utilitarians. Philosophy, 49, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2011). Human bodies: Donation for medicine and research. London: Nuffield Council of Bioethics.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    O’Neill, O. (1996). Towards justice and virtue: A constructive account of practical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Pal, R., Kar, S., Akhtar, F., & Pal, S. (2011). The quest for an Indian blood law as of blood transfusion services regulatory framework. Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, 5(2), 171–174.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Portmore, D. W. (2008). Are moral reasons morally overriding? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11, 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Prainswick, B., & Buyx, A. (2011). Solidarity: Reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ramani, K. V., Mavalankar, D. V., & Govil, D. (2009). Study of blood-transfusion services in Maharashtra and Gujarat States, India. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition, 27(2), 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rapport, F. L., & Maggs, C. J. (2002). Titmuss and the gift relationship: Altruism revisited. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(5), 495–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Reichlin, M. (2011). The role of solidarity in social responsibility for health. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 14, 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ross, W. D. (1930 [2002]) The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarenden Press.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Shaw, D. (2012). We should not let families stop organ donation from their dead relatives. British Medical Journal, 345, e5275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Singer, P. (2009). The life you can save. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Smith, P. (1993). Family responsibility and the nature of obligation. In D. T. Meyers, K. Kipnis, & C. F. Murphy (Eds.), Kindred matters. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Snelling, P. C. (2012). Saying something interesting about responsibility for health. Nursing Philosophy, 13, 161–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Sojka, B. N., & Sojka, P. (2008). The blood donation experience: Self-reported motives and obstacles for donating blood. Vox Sanguinis, 94, 56–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Spital, A. (2004). Should people who commit themselves to organ donation be granted preferred status to receive organ transplants? Clinical Transplantation, 19, 269–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Steele, W. R., Schreiber, G. B., Guiltinan, A., Nass, C., Glynn, S. A., Wright, D. J., et al. (2008). The role of altruistic behaviour, empathetic concern, and social responsibility motivation in blood donation behaviour. Transfusion, 48, 43–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Steinbock, R. (1980). Unrelated volunteers as bone marrow donors. Hastings Centre Report, 10(1), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Stewart, C., & Lynch, A. (2003). Undue influence, consent and medical treatment. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 598–601.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Stutzer, A., & Goette, L. (2010). Blood donor motivation. What is ethical? What works? ISBT Science Series, 5, 244–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Sykora, P. (2009). Altruism in medical donations reconsidered: The reciprocity approach. In Steimann, M., Sykora, P., Wiesling, U. (Eds.), Altruism reconsidered: Exploring new approaches to property in human tissue (Chap. 2, pp. 13–50). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health wealth and happiness. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Titmuss, R. (1970). The gift relationship; from human blood to social policy. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Trotter, G. (2008). Preferred allocation for registered organ donors. Transplantation Reviews, 22, 158–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    United Kingdom Blood Transfusion Service. (2010). Guidelines for Blood Transfusion in the UK. [on line] http://www.transfusionguidelines.org. Last accessed 14th March 2012.
  93. 93.
    Urmson, J. O. (1958) Saints and Heroes. In Feinburg, J. (Ed.) (1969) Moral concepts (Chap. 5, pp. 60–73). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    World Health Organisation. (2010). Towards 100 % voluntary blood donation: a global framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Zimmerman, M. J. (1996). The concept of moral obligation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adult NursingUniversity of the West of EnglandGloucesterUK

Personalised recommendations