Who Cares? Moral Obligations in Formal and Informal Care Provision in the Light of ICT-Based Home Care
- 780 Downloads
An aging population is often taken to require a profound reorganization of the prevailing health care system. In particular, a more cost-effective care system is warranted and ICT-based home care is often considered a promising alternative. Modern health care devices admit a transfer of patients with rather complex care needs from institutions to the home care setting. With care recipients set up with health monitoring technologies at home, spouses and children are likely to become involved in the caring process and informal caregivers may have to assist kin-persons with advanced care needs by means of sophisticated technology. This paper investigates some of the ethical implications of a near-future shift from institutional care to technology-assisted home care and the subsequent impact on the care recipient and formal- and informal care providers.
KeywordsCare provision Caring kin-person Filial responsibility Formal care Health monitoring Informal care Informal caregivers Obligation to care Surveillance
This paper is written within the project Personalized Health Monitoring Ethics (PHM-Ethics) funded by the European Commission (contract number 230602).
- 1.Ahn, N., Garcia, J. & Herce, J. (2005). Healthcare expenditure and demographic uncertainty. Documento de Trabajo 2005–2007. FEDEA Madrid.Google Scholar
- 2.Ahtonen, A. (2011). Active and healthy ageing—Can the EU deliver? Coalition for health, ethics and society (CHES) http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_1235_active_and_healthy_ageing.pdf.
- 3.Bakker, A. (2011). Institutionalization of demented elderly: The role of caregiver characteristics. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 273–280.Google Scholar
- 4.Barron, B., Ironside, J., & McMahon, M. (1998). The balance of care. Studies of Health Technology Information, 48, 261–265.Google Scholar
- 5.Bemelmans, R., Gelderblom, J. G., Jonker, P., & De Witte, L. (2010). Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A systematic review into effects and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002.
- 6.Brooks, S., & Miljan, L. (2003). Theories of public policy. In S. Brooks & L. Miljan (Eds.), Public policy in Canada: An introduction. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 7.Broekens, J., Heerink, M., & Rosendal, H. (2009). Assistive social robots in elderly care: A review. Gerontology, 8(2), 94–103.Google Scholar
- 8.Buller, W., Johnson, K., & Wilson, P. (2009). Aging well in a connected world, Cisco International Business Solutions Group (ISBG), Point of View, Cisco Systems Inc.Google Scholar
- 11.Daniels, N. (1998). Am i my parents keeper? An essay on justice between the young and old. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 14.English, J. (1979). What do grown children owe their parents? In O. O’Neill & W. Ruddick (Eds.), Having children. Philosphical and legal reflections on parenthood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 18.Fex, A. (2010). From novice towards self-care expert—Studies of self-care among persons using advanced medical technology at home. Doctoral thesis, Division of Nursing Science, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.Google Scholar
- 19.Gee, E. M., & Gutman, G. M. (2000). The overselling of population aging: Apocalyptic demography, intergenerational challenges, and social policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 21.Genet, N., Boerma, W., Kringos, D., Bouman, A., Fagertröm, C., & Melchiiorre M. G. (2011). Home care in Europe: A systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research.Google Scholar
- 22.Goodin, R. E. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable. A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 23.Greve, B. (2006). In there a demographic time-bomb? In B. Greve (Ed.), The future of the welfare state: European and global perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- 25.Jul, L. (2008). Adding values—Smart textile options for automotive applications. The Nordic Textile Journal. http://www.smarttextiles.se/filer/CTF_JOURNAL_0108.pdf.
- 26.Kenner, A. M. (2008). Securing the elderly body: Dementia, surveillance, and the politics of “Aging in Place”. Surveillance and Society, 5(3), 252–269.Google Scholar
- 28.Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality and dependency. Routledge.Google Scholar
- 31.McCann, J., & Christiansen, K. (1996). Home care. In A. G. Luecckenotte (Ed.), Gerontologic nursing. CV Mosby: St. Louis.Google Scholar
- 33.Minkler, M., & Estes, C. L. (Eds.). (1991). Critical Perspectives on aging: The political and moral economy of growing old. New York: Baywood.Google Scholar
- 34.Mullan, P. (2000). The imaginary time bomb: Why an ageing population is not a social problem. London: IB Tauris & Co.Google Scholar
- 35.Murray, C. J. L., & Lopez, A. D. (1999). The global burden of disease. A comprehensive study of mortality and disability from disease, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Geneve: Boston.Google Scholar
- 36.Neal, L., & Guillett, S. E. (2003). Care of the adult with a chronic illness or disability: a team approach. Elsevier Mosby: Missouri, USA.Google Scholar
- 37.Noddings, N. (1994). Moral obligation or moral support for high-tech home care? The Hastings Center Report, 24(5).Google Scholar
- 38.Nordgren, A. (2011). The web-rhetoric of companies offering home-based personal health monitoring, Health Care Analysis. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0174-z.
- 39.OECD Health Policy Studies (2010). Improving health sector efficiency: The role of information and communication technologies.Google Scholar
- 40.OECD study (2005) Long-term care for older people (2001–2004). OECD, OECD Publishing. ISBN:9789264008489Google Scholar
- 41.Oxford Dictionary of Sociology, ed. Gordon Marshall, Oxford university Press, Oxford, 2005.Google Scholar
- 42.Palm, E. (2010). The ethics of mobile health care. Etikk i Praksis/Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 4(2), 71–92.Google Scholar
- 44.Preto, N., & Mitchell, I. (2004). Ethical issues in home care. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada. Available from: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/pubs/home-domicile/2004-ethi-homedomicile/index_e.html. Accessed 3 December 2011.
- 45.Redfern, S. J., & Ross, F. (1999). Nursing older people. China: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier.Google Scholar
- 46.Ross, A. E. (2008). Taking care of our care takers: Using filial responsibility laws to support the elderly beyond the government’s assistance. The Elder Law Journal, 16(1).Google Scholar
- 47.Ruiping, F. (2009). Reconstructionist confucianism. Rethinking morality after the West. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- 48.Schermer, M. & van Kammen, J. (2004). Advanced home care technology: Moral issues surrounding a new healthcare practice. The Netherlands, Council of Public Health and Healthcare.Google Scholar
- 52.Steg, H., Strese, H., Loroff, C., Hull, J., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Europe is facing a demographic challenge—Ambient assisted living offers solutions. Berlin: VDI/VDE/IT.Google Scholar
- 56.Twigg, J. & Atkin, K. (1994). Carers perceived: Policy and practice in informal care. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- 57.UN report (2009). World population prospects: The revision 2008, United Nations, New York. http://www.economist.com/node/13888053 Commission of the European communities Brussels, SEC (2008) 2911 Commission staff working document Demography report 2008: Meeting social needs in an ageing society, executive summary.
- 58.Verbeek, P. P. (2006). Acting artifacts—The technological mediation of action. In P. P. Verbeek & A. Slob (eds.), User behavior and technology development—Shaping sustainable relations between consumers and technologies. Kluwer: Dordrecht.Google Scholar