Neurodiversity has remained a controversial concept over the last decade. In its broadest sense the concept of neurodiversity regards atypical neurological development as a normal human difference. The neurodiversity claim contains at least two different aspects. The first aspect is that autism, among other neurological conditions, is first and foremost a natural variation. The other aspect is about conferring rights and in particular value to the neurodiversity condition, demanding recognition and acceptance. Autism can be seen as a natural variation on par with for example homosexuality. The broad version of the neurodiversity claim, covering low-functioning as well as high-functioning autism, is problematic. Only a narrow conception of neurodiversity, referring exclusively to high-functioning autists, is reasonable. We will discuss the effects of DSM categorization and the medical model for high functioning autists. After a discussion of autism as a culture we will analyze various possible strategies for the neurodiversity movement to claim extra resources for autists as members of an underprivileged culture without being labelled disabled or as having a disorder. We will discuss their vulnerable status as a group and what obligation that confers on the majority of neurotypicals.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Allred, S. (2009). Reframing Asperger syndrome: Lessons from other challenges to the diagnostic and statistical manual and ICIDH approaches. Disability and Society, 24(3), 343–355.
Baker, D. L. (2006). Neurodiversity, neurological disability and the public sector: notes on the autism spectrum. Disability and Society, 21(1), 15–29.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). Is Asperger syndrome necessarily viewed as a disability? Focus on autism and other developmental disabilities, 17(3), 186–191.
Broderick, A. A. (2008). Autism as metaphor: Narrative and counter-narrative. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5), 459–476.
Brownlow, C., & O’Dell, L. (2009). Challenging understandings of theory of mind: A brief report. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 47(6), 473–478.
Davidson, J. (2008). Autistic culture online: Virtual communication and cultural expression on the spectrum. Social and Cultural Geography, 9(7), 791–806.
Farrugia, D. (2009). Exploring stigma: Medical knowledge and the stigmatisation of parents of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(7), 1011–1027.
Fenton, A., & Krahn, T. (2007). Autism, neurodiversity and equality beyond the ‘normal’. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, 2(2), 1–6.
Fitzgerald, M., & O’Brien, B. (2007). Genius genes. How Asperger talents changed the world. Shawnee Mission/Autism Asperger Publishing Company.
Goodin, R. E. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Grandin, T. (2006). Thinking in pictures and other reports from my life with autism. London: Bloomsbury.
Griffin, E., & Pollak, D. (2009). Student experiences of neurodiversity in higher education: Insights from the BRAINHE Project. Dyslexia, 15, 23–41.
Jones, R. S. P., Zahl, A., & Huws, J. C. (2001). First-hand accounts of emotional experiences in autism: A qualitative analysis. Disability and Society, 16(3), 393–401.
Jurecic, A. (2006). Mind-blindness: Autism, writing, and the problem of empathy. Literature and Medicine, 25(1), 1–23.
Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights (pp. 107–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawson, W. (2009). Single attention and associated cognition in autism (SAACA). PhD thesis Deakin University.
Levy, S. (2009). Autism. Lancet, 374, 1627–1638.
McGeer, V. (2004). Autistic self-awareness. Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology, 11(3), 253–254.
Moy, S. S., & Nadler, J. J. (2008). Advances in behavioral genetics: Mouse models of autism. Molecular Psychiatry, 13, 4–26.
Muhle, R. (2004). The genetics of autism. Pediatrics, 113, e472–e486.
Nordenfelt, L. (1987). On the nature of health. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Ortega, F. (2009). The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity. Biosciences, 4, 425–445.
Parens, E., & Asch, A. (2003). Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities, 9, 40–47.
Ruof, M. C. (2004). Vulnerability, vulnerable populations, and policy. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 14(4), 411–425.
Schroeder, D., & Gefenas, E. (2009). Vulnerability: Too vague and too broad? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18, 113–121.
Singer, J. (1999). ‘Why can’t you be normal for once in your life?’ From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability and discourse. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Williams, D. (2002). Exposure anxiety–The invisible cage: An exploration of self-protection responses in the autism spectrum, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Wing, L. (1997). The autistic spectrum. The Lancet, 350(9093), 1761–1766.
Aspies for freedom. Pro-neurodiversity website. Found at: http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com. Accessed 15/09/2010.
The human neurodiversity laboratory. Pro-neurodiversity website. Found at: http://eckertlab.org/neurodiversity, accessed 15/09/2010.
Wolbring, G. (2007). Neurodiversity, neuroenhancement, neurodisease, and neurobusiness. Pro-neurodiverswity website. Found at: http://innovationwatch-archive.com/choiceisyours/choiceisyours-2007-04-30.htm, accessed 15/09/2010.
Ventura33’s Neurodiversity Page. Pro-neurodiversity website. Found at: http://www.ventura33.com/neurodiversity/, accessed 15/09/2010.
American Psychiatric Association: DSM-V development. Found at: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=97, Accessed 15/09/2010.
About this article
Cite this article
Jaarsma, P., Welin, S. Autism as a Natural Human Variation: Reflections on the Claims of the Neurodiversity Movement. Health Care Anal 20, 20–30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9