Abstract
The prescription of practice guidelines for consent in neonatal care that are appropriate for all interventions faces substantial problems. Current practice varies widely. Consent in neonatal care is compromised by postnatal constraints on information sharing and decision-making. Empirical research shows marked individual and cultural variation in the degree to which parents want to contribute to decision-making on behalf of their infants. Conflict between the parents’ wishes and the infant’s best interests could arise if consent for a recommended intervention were refused, and parental refusal of consent may have to be overridden. Consent to an appropriate package of care (such as special, intensive or palliative care) may be morally preferable to a universal requirement to seek consent for all individual interventions entailed by that package.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beauchamp, T., and Childress, J. (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buchanan, A., and Brock, D. (1989) Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooke, R., and Foulder-Hughes, L. (2003) Growth Impairment in the Very Preterm and Cognitive and Motor Performances at 7 years. Archives of Disease in Childhood 88, 482–487.
Cuttini, M., Rebagliato, M., Bortoli, P., et al. (1999) Parental Visiting, Communication, and Participation in Ethical Decisions: A Comparison of Neonatal Unit Policies in Europe. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 81, F84–F91.
Department of Health. (2001) Review of the Deaths of Four Babies Due to Cardiac Tamponade Associated with the Presence of a Central Venous Catheter. London.
Eidelman, A., Hoffman, N., and Kaitz, M. (1993) Cognitive Deficits in Women After Childbirth. Obstetrics and Gynaecology 81, 764–767.
Halliday, H. (2003) Early Postnatal Dexamethasone and Cerebral Palsy. Pediatrics 109, 1168–1169.
Harth, S., and Thong, Y. (1995) Parental Perceptions and Attitudes About Informed Consent in Clinical Research Involving Children. Social Science and Medicine 40, 1573–1577.
Kennedy, I. (2001) Learning from Bristol: The Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. London: Stationery Office.
McHaffie, H., Laing, I., Parker M., and McMillan, J. (2001) Deciding for Imperilled Newborns: Medical Authority or Parental Autonomy? Journal of Medical Ethics 27, 104–109.
Menon, G. (2003) Neonatal Long Lines. Are they Safe? Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 88, F260–F262.
O’Neill, O. (2003) Some Limits of Informed Consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 29, 4–7.
Perlman, N., Freedman, J., Abramovitch, R., et al. (1991) Informational Needs of Parents of Sick Neonates. Pediatrics 88, 512–518.
Pierucci, R., Kirby, R., and Leuthner, S. (2001) End-of-Life Care for Neonates and Infants: The Experience and Effects of a Palliative Care Consultation Service. Pediatrics 108, 653–660.
Shenoy, S., Archdeacon, C., Kotecha, S., and Elias-Jones, A. (2003) Current Practice for Obtaining Consent in UK Neonatal Units. Bulletin of Medical Ethics 188, 17–19.
Zupancic, J., Kirpalani, H., Barrett, J., et al. (2002) Characterising Doctor-parent Communication in Counselling for Impending Preterm Delivery. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 87, F113–F117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manning, D. Proxy Consent in Neonatal Care—Goal-Directed or Procedure-Specific?. Health Care Anal 13, 1–9 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-2566-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-2566-4