Skip to main content

Impact of Decision Rules and Non-cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making

Abstract

In group decision making, it is sensible to achive minimum consensus cost (MCC) because the consensus reaching process resources are often limited. In this endeavour, though, there are still two issues that require paying attention to: (1) the impact of decision rules, including decision weights and aggregation functions, on MCC; and (2) the impact of non-cooperative behaviors on MCC. Hence, this paper analytically reveals the decision rules to minimize MCC or maximize MCC. Furthermore, detailed simulation experiments show the joint impact of non-cooperative behavior and decisions rules on MCC, as well as revealing the effect of the consensus within the established MCC target.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Akram M, Arshad M (2018) A novel trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy topsis method for group decision-making. Group Decis Negot 28(3):565–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akram M, Adeel A, Alcantud JCR (2019a) Group decision-making methods based on hesitant N-soft sets. Expert Syst Appl 115:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akram M, Ali G, Alcantud JCR (2019b) New decision-making hybrid model: intuitionistic fuzzy N-soft rough sets. Soft Comput 23(20):9853–9868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akram M, Ilyas F, Garg H (2019c) Multi-criteria group decisionmaking based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information. Soft Comput (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04105-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43(3):713–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ben-Arieh D, Easton T, Evans B (2008) Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part A Syst Hum 39(1):210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng D, Zhou ZL, Cheng FX, Zhou YF, Xie YJ (2018) Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context. Eur J Oper Res 270:1122–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiclana F, Tapia García JM, Del Moral MJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inf Sci 221:110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dong YC, Xu JP (2016) Consensus building in group decision making: Searching the consensus path with minimum adjustments. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY, Feng B (2010) The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. Eur J Oper Res 203(2):455–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong YC, Li CC, Xu YF, Gu X (2015) Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decis Negot 24:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its application in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dong YC, Liu YT, Liang HM, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making. Omega 75:154–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong YC, Zha QB, Zhang HJ, Kou G, Fujita H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018a) Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: research paradigms and challenges. Knowl-Based Syst 162:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong YC, Zhao SH, Zhang HJ, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018b) A self-management mechanism for non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group consensus reaching processes. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3276–3288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fedrizzi KM (1988) A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 34(3):316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gong ZW, Xu XX, Lu FL, Li LS, Xu C (2015a) On consensus models with utility preferences and limited budget. Appl Soft Comput 35:840–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li L, Xu X (2015b) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Oper Res 240:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2017) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on china’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):379–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gong ZW, Guo WW, Herrera-Viedma E, Gong ZJ, Wei G (2019) Consistency and consensus modeling of linear uncertain preference relations. Eur J Oper Res (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gong ZW, Wang H, Guo WW, Gong ZJ, Wei G (2020) Measuring trust in social networks based on linear uncertainty theory. Inf Sci 508:154–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32(3):394–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fus 17:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kacprzyk J, Zadrożny S (2010) Soft computing and Web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching. Soft Comput 14:833–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kacprzyk J, Zadrożny S (2016) On a fairness type approach to consensus reaching support under fuzziness via linguistic summaries. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp 1999–2006

  26. Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preference and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1997) Soft degrees of consensus under additive preferences and fuzzy majorities. Consensus Under Fuzziness. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kacprzyk J, Zadrozny S, Ras ZW (2010) How to support consensus reaching using action rules: a novel approach. Int J Uncertain 18:451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ogryczak W, Śliwiński T (2003) On solving linear programs with the ordered weighted averaging objective. Eur J Oper Res 148(1):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Palomares I, Estrella FJ, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014a) Consensus under a fuzzy context: taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Inf Fus 20:252–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Palomares I, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014b) A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:516–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pelta DA, Yager RR (2010) Decision strategies in mediated multiagent negotiations: an optimization approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 40:635–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Quesada FJ, Palomares I, Martínez L (2014) Managing experts behaviors in large-scale consensus reaching process with uninorm aggregation operators. Appl Soft Comput 35:873–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tan X, Gong ZW, Chiclana F, Zhang N (2018) Consensus modeling with cost chance constraint under uncertainty opinions. Appl Soft Comput 67:721–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yager RR (2001) Penalizing strategic preference manipulation in multi-agent decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 9:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yager RR (2002) Defending against strategic manipulation in uninorm-based multi-agent decision making. Eur J Oper Res 141:217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY (2011) Minimum-cost consensus models under aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Part A Syst Hum 41(6):1253–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang N, Gong Z, Chiclana F (2017) Minimum cost consensus models based on random opinions. Expert Syst Appl 89:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang BW, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2019a) Group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures: an automatic mechanism to support consensus reaching. Group Decis Negot 28:585–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang HH, Gang K, Yi P (2019b) Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations. Eur J Oper Res 277(3):964–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Yu S (2019c) Consensus efficiency in group decision making: a comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design. Eur J Oper Res 275:580–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Weijun Xu would like to acknowledge the financial support of Grants (Nos. 71771091, 71720107002) from NSF of China, and Yucheng Dong would like to acknowledge the financial support of Grant (No. 71871149) from NSF of China, and Grant (No. sksyl201705) from Sichuan University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yucheng Dong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, W., Chen, X., Dong, Y. et al. Impact of Decision Rules and Non-cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making. Group Decis Negot (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09653-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Group decision making
  • Consensus
  • Cost
  • Decision rules
  • Non-cooperative behaviors
  • Simulation experiment