In group decision making, it is sensible to achive minimum consensus cost (MCC) because the consensus reaching process resources are often limited. In this endeavour, though, there are still two issues that require paying attention to: (1) the impact of decision rules, including decision weights and aggregation functions, on MCC; and (2) the impact of non-cooperative behaviors on MCC. Hence, this paper analytically reveals the decision rules to minimize MCC or maximize MCC. Furthermore, detailed simulation experiments show the joint impact of non-cooperative behavior and decisions rules on MCC, as well as revealing the effect of the consensus within the established MCC target.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Akram M, Arshad M (2018) A novel trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy topsis method for group decision-making. Group Decis Negot 28(3):565–584
Akram M, Adeel A, Alcantud JCR (2019a) Group decision-making methods based on hesitant N-soft sets. Expert Syst Appl 115:95–105
Akram M, Ali G, Alcantud JCR (2019b) New decision-making hybrid model: intuitionistic fuzzy N-soft rough sets. Soft Comput 23(20):9853–9868
Akram M, Ilyas F, Garg H (2019c) Multi-criteria group decisionmaking based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information. Soft Comput (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04105-0
Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43(3):713–721
Ben-Arieh D, Easton T, Evans B (2008) Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part A Syst Hum 39(1):210–217
Cheng D, Zhou ZL, Cheng FX, Zhou YF, Xie YJ (2018) Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context. Eur J Oper Res 270:1122–1137
Chiclana F, Tapia García JM, Del Moral MJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inf Sci 221:110–123
Dong YC, Xu JP (2016) Consensus building in group decision making: Searching the consensus path with minimum adjustments. Springer, Berlin
Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY, Feng B (2010) The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. Eur J Oper Res 203(2):455–463
Dong YC, Li CC, Xu YF, Gu X (2015) Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decis Negot 24:217–242
Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its application in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15
Dong YC, Liu YT, Liang HM, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making. Omega 75:154–164
Dong YC, Zha QB, Zhang HJ, Kou G, Fujita H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018a) Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: research paradigms and challenges. Knowl-Based Syst 162:3–13
Dong YC, Zhao SH, Zhang HJ, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018b) A self-management mechanism for non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group consensus reaching processes. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3276–3288
Fedrizzi KM (1988) A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 34(3):316–325
Gong ZW, Xu XX, Lu FL, Li LS, Xu C (2015a) On consensus models with utility preferences and limited budget. Appl Soft Comput 35:840–849
Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li L, Xu X (2015b) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Oper Res 240:183–192
Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2017) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on china’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):379–407
Gong ZW, Guo WW, Herrera-Viedma E, Gong ZJ, Wei G (2019) Consistency and consensus modeling of linear uncertain preference relations. Eur J Oper Res (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.035
Gong ZW, Wang H, Guo WW, Gong ZJ, Wei G (2020) Measuring trust in social networks based on linear uncertainty theory. Inf Sci 508:154–172
Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32(3):394–402
Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fus 17:4–13
Kacprzyk J, Zadrożny S (2010) Soft computing and Web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching. Soft Comput 14:833–846
Kacprzyk J, Zadrożny S (2016) On a fairness type approach to consensus reaching support under fuzziness via linguistic summaries. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp 1999–2006
Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preference and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49(1):21–31
Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1997) Soft degrees of consensus under additive preferences and fuzzy majorities. Consensus Under Fuzziness. Springer, Berlin
Kacprzyk J, Zadrozny S, Ras ZW (2010) How to support consensus reaching using action rules: a novel approach. Int J Uncertain 18:451–470
Ogryczak W, Śliwiński T (2003) On solving linear programs with the ordered weighted averaging objective. Eur J Oper Res 148(1):80–91
Palomares I, Estrella FJ, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014a) Consensus under a fuzzy context: taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Inf Fus 20:252–271
Palomares I, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014b) A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:516–530
Pelta DA, Yager RR (2010) Decision strategies in mediated multiagent negotiations: an optimization approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 40:635–640
Quesada FJ, Palomares I, Martínez L (2014) Managing experts behaviors in large-scale consensus reaching process with uninorm aggregation operators. Appl Soft Comput 35:873–887
Tan X, Gong ZW, Chiclana F, Zhang N (2018) Consensus modeling with cost chance constraint under uncertainty opinions. Appl Soft Comput 67:721–727
Yager RR (2001) Penalizing strategic preference manipulation in multi-agent decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 9:393–403
Yager RR (2002) Defending against strategic manipulation in uninorm-based multi-agent decision making. Eur J Oper Res 141:217–232
Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY (2011) Minimum-cost consensus models under aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Part A Syst Hum 41(6):1253–1261
Zhang N, Gong Z, Chiclana F (2017) Minimum cost consensus models based on random opinions. Expert Syst Appl 89:149–159
Zhang BW, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2019a) Group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures: an automatic mechanism to support consensus reaching. Group Decis Negot 28:585–617
Zhang HH, Gang K, Yi P (2019b) Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations. Eur J Oper Res 277(3):964–980
Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Yu S (2019c) Consensus efficiency in group decision making: a comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design. Eur J Oper Res 275:580–598
Weijun Xu would like to acknowledge the financial support of Grants (Nos. 71771091, 71720107002) from NSF of China, and Yucheng Dong would like to acknowledge the financial support of Grant (No. 71871149) from NSF of China, and Grant (No. sksyl201705) from Sichuan University.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, W., Chen, X., Dong, Y. et al. Impact of Decision Rules and Non-cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making. Group Decis Negot (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09653-7
- Group decision making
- Decision rules
- Non-cooperative behaviors
- Simulation experiment