Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Orientation and Performance Satisfaction as Predictors of Small Firm Innovation: The Moderating Role of Gender

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on innovation in the context of small entrepreneurial firms is limited. Limited available studies on innovation in small firms are devoted mostly to firms operating in knowledge-intensive or technology industries and ignore the vast majority of small firms operating in traditional and less knowledge-intensive sectors of the economy. The rapid pace of technological change and the intensifying environmental turbulence in our economy influence all firms, including the majority of small firms that are perishing at a faster rate. Innovation is a key competitive tool for survival in a turbulent environment. Thus, it is important to understand factors influencing innovation in small firms. In this paper, we explore how learning orientation, a small-firm owner’s satisfaction with firm performance, and the firm owner’s gender influence innovation in small firms. We test the proposed model on a sample of small firms located in the United States of America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Açıkgöz A, Günsel A, Bayyurt N, Kuzey C (2014) Team climate, team cognition, team intuition, and software quality. Group Decis Negot 23(5):1145–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Açıkgöz A, Günsel A, Kuzey C (2016) Team foresight in new product development projects. Group Decis Negot 25(2):289–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahl H, Marlow S (2012) Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization 19(5):543–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andries P, Czarnitzki D (2014) Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement. Small Bus Econ 43(1):21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WE, Sinkula JM (1999) The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. J Acad Market Sci 27(4):411–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM, Avolio BJ (1994) Shatter the glass ceiling: women may make better managers. Hum Resour Manag 33(4):549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Atwater L (1996) The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Appl Psychol 45(1):5–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor JH (2015) Exposing the role of gender in the performance of founding entrepreneurs. J Small Bus Strategy 25(2):21–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman C, Ambrosini V (1997) Using single respondents in strategy research. Br J Manag 8(2):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton Miller L, Miller D (2009) Agency versus stewardship in public family firms: a social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrep Theory Pract 33(6):1169–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromily P (1991) Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad Manag J 34(1):37–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush C (1992) Research on women business owners: past trends, a new perspective and future directions. Entrep Theory Pract 16(4):5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush C, Hisrich RD (1999)Women-owned businesses: why do they matter? In: Acs ZJ (ed) Are small firms important? Their role and impact. Springer, Boston, MA, p 111–127

  • Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2003) Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J Appl Psychol 88(3):552–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttner EH, Rosen B (1992) Rejection in the loan application process: male and female entrepreneurs’ perceptions and subsequent intentions. J Small Bus Manag 30(1):58–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmelo-Ordaz C, Garcia-Cruz J, Sousa-Genel E (2014) The influence of top management team conflict on firm innovativeness. Group Decis Negot 24(6):957–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale PJ (2008) Positive affect and decision frame in negotiation. Group Decis Negot 17(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter NM, Williams ML (2003) The case of new firm growth. N Perspect Women Entrep 3:25–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter S, Anderson S, Shaw E (2000) Women’s business ownership: a review of the academic, popular, and internet literature with a UK policy focus. Ann Rev Progr Entrep 1:66–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (2000) The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. J Mark 64(3):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM, Raynor ME (2003) The innovation’s solution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AC, Artz KW (1995) Determinants of satisfaction for entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 10(6):439–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan MM, Apaydin M (2010) A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J Manag Stud 47(6):1154–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currah A, Wrigley N (2004) Networks of organizational learning and adaptation in retail TNCs. Glob Netw 4(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft RL (1978) A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Acad Manag J 21(2):193–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour F, Evan WM (1984) Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Adm Sci Q 29:392–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P (2010) Adopting proactive environmental strategy: the influence of stakeholders and firm size. J Manag Stud 47(6):1072–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’aveni RA (2010) Hypercompetition. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin A, Brush CG, Welter F (2006) Introduction to the special issue: towards building cumulative knowledge on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 30(5):585–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis A, Frattini F, Lichtenthaler U (2013) Research on technological innovation in family firms: present debates and future directions. Fam Bus Rev 26(1):10–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Winne S, Sels L (2010) Interrelationships between human capital, HRM, and innovation in Belgian start-ups aiming at an innovation strategy. Int J Hum Resour Manag 21(11):1863–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRue DS, Wellman N (2009) Developing leaders via experience: the role of developmental challenge, learning orientation, and feedback availability. J Appl Psychol 94(4):859–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess GG, Picken JC (2000) Changing roles: leadership in the twenty-first century. Org Dyn 28(3):18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano R, Brugnach M, Pluchinotta I (2017) Ambiguity in problem framing as a barrier to collective actions: some hints from groundwater protection policy in the Apulia region. Group Decis Negot 26(5):911–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta VK, Turban DB, Wasti SA, Sikdar A (2009) The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrep Theory Pract 33(2):397–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9(2):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (2000) Leading the revolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman AJ, Cannella AA, Paetzold RL (2000) The resource dependence role of corporate directors: strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. J Manag Stud 37(2):235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich R, Brush C (1984) The woman entrepreneur: management skills and business problems. J Small Bus Manag 22(1):30–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmieleski KM, Ensley MD (2007) A contextual examination of new venture performance: entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism. J Org Behav 28(7):865–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult GTM, Hurley RF, Knight GA (2004) Innovativeness: its antecedents and impact on business performance. Ind Mark Manag 33(5):429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley RF, Hult GTM (1998) Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. J Mark 62(3):42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen DR (1971) Satisfaction with performance as a function of the initial level of expected performance and the deviation from expectations. Org Behav Hum Perform 6(3):345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg AL, Leicht KT (1991) Gender and organizational performance: determinants of small business survival and success. Acad Manag J 34(1):136–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskin H (2006) Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs: an extended model. Eur J Innov Manag 9(4):396–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaas BS, Klimchak M, Semadeni M, Holmes JJ (2010) The adoption of human capital services by small and medium enterprises: a diffusion of innovation perspective. J Bus Ventur 25(4):349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser PM, Davis J (2010) Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the unique impact of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. J Small Bus Entrep 23(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DJ, Gibbons FX (2007) Am I the typical student? Perceived similarity to student prototypes predicts success. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33(10):1380–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lant T, Shapira Z (2008) Managerial reasoning about aspirations and expectations. J Econ Behav Organ 66(1):60–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JW, Beamish PW (2001) The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strateg Manag J 22(6–7):565–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahto RV, Khanin D (2015) Satisfaction with past financial performance, risk taking, and future performance expectations in the family business. J Small Bus Manag 53(3):801–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahto RV, Davis PS, Pearce II, John A, Robinson RB Jr (2010) Satisfaction with firm performance in family businesses. Entrep Theory Pract 34(5):985–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahto RV, Ahluwalia S, Walsh ST (2017) Innovation in small firms: Does family versus non-family matter? J Small Bus Strategy 27(3):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Markin E, Swab RG, Marshall DR (2017) Who is driving the bus? An analysis of author and institution contributions to entrepreneurship research. J Innov Knowl 2(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy G, Tocher N (2017) Diversification in small firms: does parental influence matter? J Small Bus Strategy 27(3):26–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasution HN, Mavondo FT, Matanda MJ, Ndubisi NO (2011) Entrepreneurship: its relationship with market orientation and learning orientation and as antecedents to innovation and customer value. Ind Mark Manag 40(3):336–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olugbola SA (2017) Exploring entrepreneurial readiness of youth and startup success components: entrepreneurship training as a moderator. J Innov Knowl 2(3):155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pett T, Wolff J (2016) Entrepreneurial orientation and learning in high- and low-performing SMEs. J Small Bus Strategy 26(2):71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian G, Li L (2003) Profitability of small- and medium-sized enterprises in high-tech industries: the case of the biotechnology industry. Strateg Manag J 24(9):881–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PD, Bygrave W, Autio E (2004). GEM 2003 Executive Report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College; London, U.K.: London Business School; and Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation

  • Schenkel MT, D’Souza RR, Cornwall JR, Matthews CH (2015) Early influences and entrepreneurial intent: examining the roles of education, experience, and advice networks. J Small Bus Strategy 25(2):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (2006) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton DL, Bowman-Upton N (1990) Female and male entrepreneurs: psychological characteristics and their role in gender-related discrimination. J Bus Ventur 5(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinkle GA (2012) Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: building on the past and aiming for the future. J Manag 38(1):415–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula JM, Baker WE, Noordewier T (1997) A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. J Acad Mark Sci 25(4):305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slevin DP, Terjesen SA (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation: reviewing three papers and implications for further theoretical and methodological development. Entrep Theory Pract 35(5):973–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley LJ, McDowell W (2014) The role of interorganizational trust and organizational efficacy in family and nonfamily firms. J Fam Bus Strategy 5(3):264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terziovski M (2010) Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 31(8):892–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom SM, Fox CR, Trepel C, Poldrack RA (2007) The neutral basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science 31(5811):515–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Small Business Administration (2010) The small business economy: a report to the President. Retrieved from https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/sb_econ2010.pdf

  • Van Uxem FW, Bais J (1996) Het starten van een bedrijf: ervaringen van 2000 starters. EIM/Algemeen Economisch Beleid

  • Verheul I, Thurik R (2001) Start-up capital: Does gender matter? Small Bus Econ 16(4):329–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CL (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrep Theory Pract 32(4):635–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welbourne TM, Pardo-del-Val M (2009) Relational capital: strategic advantage for small and medium-size enterprises. Group Decis Negot 18(5):483–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh DHB, Kaciak E, Trimi S, Mainardes EW (2017) Women entrepreneurs and family-firm heterogeneity: evidence from an emerging economy. Group Decis Negot. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-017-9544-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelen TL, Hunger JD (1999) Strategic management; year 2000. In: Global The (ed) Millennium, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins RR, Ruefli TW (2005) Schumpeter’s ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strateg Manag J 26(10):887–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens J (1987) Her own business. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap CM, Souder WE (1994) Factors influencing new product success and failure in small entrepreneurial high-technology electronics firms. J Prod Innov Manag 11(5):418–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharakis AL, Meyer GD, DeCastro J (1999) Differing perceptions of new venture failure: a matched exploratory study of venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. J Small Bus Manag 37(3):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Covin JG (1995) Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. J Bus Ventur 10(1):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Raj V. Mahto

  2. Bradley University, Peoria, IL, USA

    William C. McDowell

  3. Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, FL, USA

    Jerry Kudlats

  4. Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA

    Timothy C. Dunne

Authors
  1. Raj V. Mahto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William C. McDowell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jerry Kudlats
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Timothy C. Dunne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William C. McDowell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahto, R.V., McDowell, W.C., Kudlats, J. et al. Learning Orientation and Performance Satisfaction as Predictors of Small Firm Innovation: The Moderating Role of Gender. Group Decis Negot 27, 375–391 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9566-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9566-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation