Skip to main content
Log in

Confucian Ideal Personality and Chinese Business Negotiation Styles: An Indigenous Perspective

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China has become one of the most important economies in the global market, but negotiating with the Chinese remains a great challenge for most Westerners. This study is to help better understand Chinese business negotiation styles with an indigenous perspective by exploring the impact of Confucian ideal personality on business negotiation process in China. This study tests the effects of three key components of Confucian ideal personality—benevolence (Ren), wisdom (Zhi), and courage (Yong) on Chinese negotiation behaviors and further on negotiation outcomes with 200 business students in a simulated negotiation exercise. The results support the significant effects of benevolence and courage on Chinese business negotiation styles but wisdom is not found to have any significant impact in China. The overall pattern of the results substantiates the strong influence of Confucianism on Chinese negotiation styles, and provides an important supplement to negotiation theories developed in the West.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We are very grateful to one anonymous reviewer for the suggestion on identifying the appropriate level of analysis.

References

  • Adler N, Brahm R, Graham J (1992) Strategy implementation: a comparison of face-to-face negotiation in the people’s republic of China and the United States. Strateg Manag J 13(6):449–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry B, Friedman RA (1998) Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation. J Personal Social Psychol 74(2):345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman MH, Curhan JR, Moore DA, Valley KL (2000) Negotiation. Annu Rev Psychol 51(1):279–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman C (2001) China business: the rules of the game. Allan and Unwin, St. Leonards

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg News (2012) China to Bring ‘New Ideas’ to Managing Foreign Reserves. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-12/china-to-bring-new-ideas-to-managing-foreign-reserves-1-.html. Retrieved on May 20, 2012

  • Brislin RW (1986) The wording and translation of research instruments. In: Lonner WJ, Berry JW (eds) Field methods in cross-cultural research. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 137–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill G, Walker O, Ford N (1990) Sale force management, 3rd edn. Irwin, Homewood

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu CKW (2003) Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 91:280–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang T (1999) Chinese business negotiating style. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang T (2006) Negotiation: the Chinese style. J Bus Ind Mark 21(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure GO (1999) The cultural dimension of negotiation: the Chinese case. Group Decis Negotiat 8(3):187–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand MJ, Dyer N (2000) A cultural perspective on negotiation: progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Ann Psychol Int Rev 49(1):62–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri P, Fang T (2001) Negotiating with the Chinese: a social-cultural analysis. J World Bus 36(3):303–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith CE (1991) Personality and gender as factors in interpersonal negotiation. J Social Behav Personal 6(4):915–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann MG, Kogan N (1977) Effects of negotiators’ personalities on negotiating behavior. In: Druckman D (ed) Negotiations: social-psychological perspectives. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 247–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic data analysis. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Worm V (2004) Institutional dynamics and the negotiation process: comparing India and China. Int J Confl Manag 15(3):304–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Lo TW (1988) American business people’s perceptions of marketing and negotiating in People’s Republic of China. Int Mark Rev 5(2):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki RJ, Litterer JA, Minton JW, Saunders DM (1994) Negotiation, 2nd edn. Irwin, Burr Ridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu LA, Friedman RA, Chi S (2005) ‘Ren Qing’ versus the ‘Big Five’: the role of culturally sensitive measures of individual difference in distributive negotiations. Manag Organ Rev 1(2):225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z (2006) Negotiating into China: the impact of individual perception on Chinese negotiations styles. Int J Emerg Markets 1(1):64–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z (2007) Conflict management styles as indicators of behavioural pattern in business negotiation: the impact of contextualism in two countries. Int J Confl Manag 18(3):260–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z (2008) Personality and negotiation revisited: toward a cognitive model of dyadic negotiation. Manag Res News 31(10):774–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z (2010) The SINS in business negotiation: explore the cross-cultural differences in business ethics between Canada and China. J Bus Ethics 91(1):123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Erkus A, Tabak A (2010) Explore the impact of collectivism on conflict management styles: a Turkish study. Int J Confl Manag 21(2):169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Jaeger A (2005) Getting to yes in China: exploring individual differences in Chinese negotiation styles. Group Decis Negotiat 14(5):415–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick DM, McClintock CG (1968) Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. J Exp Social Psychol 4:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles M (2003) Negotiating with the Chinese. J Appl Behav Sci 39(4):453–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintu-Wimsatt A (2002) Personality and negotiation style: the moderating effects of cultural context. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 44(6):729–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt DG, Lewis SA (1975) Development of integrative solutions in bilateral-negotiation. J Personal Social Psychol 31(4):621–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puck JF, Holtbrügge D, Mohr MT (2009) Beyond entry mode choice: explaining the conversion of joint ventures into wholly owned subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China. J Int Bus Stud 40(3):388–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pye LW (1992) Chinese negotiation style: commercial approaches and cultural principles. Quorum Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin JZ, Brown BR (1975) The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar O, Ronen S (1987) The cultural context of negotiations: the implications of Chinese interpersonal norms. J Appl Behav Sci 23(2):263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector B (1997) Negotiation as a psychological process. J Confl Resolut 21(4):607–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr JB (2001) Understanding China: a guide to China’s economy, history, and political culture. Hill and Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson L (1990) Negotiation behavior and outcomes: empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychol Bull 108(3):515–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung RL (1989) A longitudinal study of United States-China business negotiations. China Econ Rev 1(1):57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingart LR, Thompson L, Bazerman MH, Carroll JS (1990) Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. Int J Confl Manag 1(1):7–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo HS, Prud’homme C (1999) Cultural characteristics prevalent in the Chinese negotiation process. Eur Bus Rev 99(5):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang KS, Bond MH (1990) Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: the Chinese case. J Personal Social Psychol 58(6):1087–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yik MSM, Bond MH (1993) Exploring the dimensions of Chinese perception with indigenous and imported constructs: creating a culturally balanced scale. Int J Psychol 28(1):75–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenzhong Ma.

Additional information

This study is partially supported by a Standard Research Grant of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC #410-2009-0271) to the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Z., Dong, W., Wu, J. et al. Confucian Ideal Personality and Chinese Business Negotiation Styles: An Indigenous Perspective. Group Decis Negot 24, 383–400 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9394-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9394-6

Keywords

Navigation