Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing the Robustness of Decision Strategies in Multiagent Decision Making

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We consider a multiagent decision making problem where an agent, being able to estimate the preferences of other agents, defines its own in such a way that, after an aggregation process, its most desired alternative receives the highest group support. In previous work, this informed agent defined its preferences as the solution of a non-linear optimization problem. In this competitive scenario, and focusing on this agent, we analyze the amount of imprecision in the estimates that can be tolerated while still making its most preferred alternative the most supported one. We empirically show that, even when considering just the “harmful” errors in the estimates, the informed agent is able to force the group decision towards its interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow K (1952) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beliakov G, Pradera A, Calvo T (2007) Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners, volume 221 of studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Springer, Berlin

  • Calvo T, Mayor G, Mesiar R (2002) Aggregation operators: new trends and applications, volume 97 of studies in Fuzziness and soft computing. Springer, Berlin

  • Fro (2007) Premium solver platform, user guide, version 08. Frontline Systems Inc, Sydney

  • Kahraman C (ed) (2008) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making theory and applications with recent developments, volume 16 of Springer optimization and its applications. Springer, Berlin

  • Kangas A, Lreskinen P, Kangas J (2007) Comparison of fuzzy and statistical approaches in multi-criteria decision making. For Sci 53:37–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S (2001) Automated negotiation and decision making in multiagent environments. In: Luck M (ed) Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 2086, pp 150–172

  • Madani K, Lund JR (2011) A monte-carlo game theoretic approach for multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 34(5):607–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasi G, Yager RR (2006) Modeling the concept of majority opinion in group decision making. Inf Sci 176(4):390–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelta D, Yager R (2010) Decision strategies in mediated multi-agents negotiations: an optimization approach. IEEE Trans SMC Part A 40(3):635–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Torra V, Narukawa Y (2007) Modeling decisions: information fusion and aggregation operators. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanicek J, Vrana I, Aly S (2009) Fuzzy aggregation and averaging for group decision making: a generalization and survey. Knowl Based Syst 22(1):79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R (2007) Multi-agent negotiation using linguistically expressed mediation rules. Group Decis Negot 16(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Kacprzyk J, Beliakov G (eds) (2008) Recent developments in the ordered weighted averaging operators: theory and practice, volume 265 of studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Springer, Berlin

Download references

Acknowledgments

D. Pelta acknowledges support from projects TIN2011-27696-C02-01, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and P11-TIC-8001 from the Andalusian Government (including FEDER funds from the European Union). Ronald Yager’s contribution was in part supported by an ARO Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) grant (Number W911NF-09-1-0392) and by the ONR grant for “Modeling Human Behavior with Fuzzy and Soft Computing Methods”, award number N00014-13-1-0626. The authors thanks the financial support of the Granada Excellence Network of Innovation Laboratories (GENIL), University of Granada (UGR), Campus of International Excellence BioTic-Granada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Pelta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pelta, D.A., Yager, R.R. Analyzing the Robustness of Decision Strategies in Multiagent Decision Making. Group Decis Negot 23, 1403–1416 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-013-9376-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-013-9376-0

Keywords

Navigation