Skip to main content
Log in

The Connectedness Decision Paradigm: Group Decision, Negotiation and Leadership in World Problems

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss connectedness, a dynamic unity relation experience. The Connectedness Decision Paradigm (CDP) is a formal, general systems-spirituality framework, technology-supported, for group decision and negotiation (GDN) and leadership in making “right” decisions. A right problem/solution is validated by a spiritual rationality validation test involving connectedness. A participant (agent) may experience connectedness with purposes (intended results). Purposes for which there is reciprocated (shared) purpose connectedness across agents constitute common ground for these agents. A basic idea is to identify and expand such common ground. Even in difficult problem solving, as with polarization, where there seems to be little or no common ground, a priori there is always the ultimate purpose common ground of connectedness with One (spirituality) from which other common ground as connectedness with the “other” can arise. Common ground can lead to additional common ground and to an agreed problem solution—itself constituting common ground—that can be tested for rightness. Our focus here is on human agents considered as spiritual purposeful complex adaptive systems in multiagent environments. The ideas are applicable to other agents with lesser or greater capabilities than humans according to their capabilities. Expanding earlier work, this commentary on CDP is also based on GDN 2012, 2013 meeting remarks by the author, as well as on a lecture, “Hope on the Edge of Chaos: The New Connectedness Paradigm in World Affairs”, Hamilton Hall, Salem, Massachusetts, February 2012. In presenting CDP, this commentary is also a call for problem solving frameworks for GDN and leadership, and solutions to world problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beers PJ et al (2006) Common ground, complex problems and decision making. Group Decis Negotiat 15(6):529–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouee CE (2013) China’s management revolution. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Datar SM, Garvin DA, Cullen PG (2010) Rethinking the MBA: business education at a crossroads. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman D (2006) Social intelligence. Bantam Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt J (2012) The righteous mind. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen R (2009) Buddha’s brain. New Harbinger Purlications, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood J (2013) Deep philosophical divide underlies the impasse. New York Times, New York, pp A10

  • Jassin K et al (2013) Negotiating cultural conflicts over sacred calues. In: Sycara G, Abbe (eds) Springer, Models for Intercultural Collaboration and Negotiation, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

  • Lehrer J (2009) How we decide. Houghton, Mifflin Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lax DA, Sebenius JK (1986) The managerial negotiator: bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. Free Press, New York

  • Nye JS Jr (2008) The powers to lead. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (1988) Evolutionary systems design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (1999) An ESD computer culture for intercultural problem solving and negotiation. Group Decis Negotiat 8(3):237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (2001) Unbounded rationality. Group Decis Negotiat 10(2):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (2003) Right problem solving: doing the right thing right. Group Decis Negotiat 12(6):463–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (2005) Multi-bilateral multi-issue E-negotiation in E-commerce with a Tit-for-Tat computer agent. Group Decis Negotiat 14(5):383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (2009) Connectedness problem solving and negotiation. Group Decis Negotiat 18(2):89–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (2010) Doing right: connectedness problem solving and negotiation. In: Kilgour M, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF, Sudit EF (2010) Connectedness capitalism. Group Decis Negotiat 19(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD (1996) Complexity and creativity in organizations. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolle E (2003) Stillness speaks. New World Library, Novato, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melvin F. Shakun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shakun, M.F. The Connectedness Decision Paradigm: Group Decision, Negotiation and Leadership in World Problems. Group Decis Negot 22, 599–615 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-013-9351-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-013-9351-9

Keywords

Navigation