Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Sorting Model for Group Decision Making: A Case Study of Water Losses in Brazil

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many water supply systems in Brazil have serious problems related to the high index of water losses, which provokes financial and environmental impacts. This is an immediate consequence of an inadequate maintenance plan, allied to natural and budgetary constraints. In addition, in these types of problems it is commonplace to consider the opinions of many managers, such as those from the operational, environmental and financial sectors of Water Companies. In view of this, a sorting multicriteria model to support group decision making is developed. We proposed an approach which sorts the areas of the system which are located in critical zones of water losses into categories, and which takes into account different points of view and considers uncertainty in criteria weights by using only ordinal information, so as to make it viable to manage the maintenance plan and to use the scant financial resources more efficiently. The SMAA-TRI method is used to tackle the group sorting problematic by categorizing the network into zones where losses are intense and thus to focus the managers’ effort on the most critical regions. A case study in Brazil is presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the approach proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arreguín-Cortes FI, Ochoa-Alejo LH (1997) Evaluation of water losses in distribution networks. J Water Resour Planing Manag 123(5): 284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon M (2006) The role of the DS/AHP in identifying inter-group alliances and majority rule within group decision making. Group Decis Negot 15(1): 21–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bregar A, Gyorkos J, Rozman I (2003) An alternative sorting procedure for interactive group decision support based on the pseudo-criterion concept. J Syst Cybern Inf 1(4): 66–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Kilgour D, Hipel K (2012) A decision rule aggregation approach to multiple criteria-multiple participant sorting. Group Decis Negot 21(5): 727–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conejo JGL, Lopes ARG, Marcka E (1999) Panorama dos Sistemas Públicos de Abastecimento no País. Casos selecionados de estratégias de combate ao desperdício. PNCDA—Programa Nacional de Combate ao Desperdício de Água, DTA—Documento técnicos de Apoio C2, Brasília

  • Daher SFD, Almeida AT (2010) Recent patents using group decision support systems: a short review. Recent Pat Comput Sci 3: 81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daher SFD, Almeida AT (2012) The use of ranking veto concept to mitigate the compensatory effects of additive aggregation in group decisions on a water utility automation investment. Group Decis Negot 21(2): 185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damart S, Dias L, Mousseau V (2007) Supporting groups in sorting decisions: methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS. Decis Support Syst 43: 1464–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Roy B (2002) Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur J Oper Res 139(2): 317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halabi AX, Montoya-Torres JR, Obregón N (2012) A case study of group decision method for environmental foresight and water resources planning using a fuzzy approach. Group Decis Negot 21(2): 205–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamalainen RP, Kettunen E, Ehtamo H, Marttunen M (2001) Evaluating a framework for multi-stakeholder decision support in water resources management. Group Decis Negot 10: 331–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunaidi O, Chu W, Wang A, Guan W (2000) Detecting leaks in plastic pipes. J Am Water Works Assoc 92(2): 82–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabeur K, Martel JM (2007) An ordinal sorting method for group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 180: 1272–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdelma R, Salminen P (2001) SMAA-2: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Oper Res 49(3): 444–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert V, Hirner W (2002) Losses from water supply systems: standard terminology and recommended performance measures. Voda i sanitarna tehnika 32: 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie R, Seago C (2005) Assessment of real losses in potable water distribution systems: some recent developments. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 5(1): 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsatsinis N, Grigoroudis E, Samaras A (2005) Aggregation and disaggregation of preferences for collective decision-making. Group Decis Negot 14(3): 217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais DC, Almeida AT (2006) Water supply system decision making using multicriteria analysis. Water SA 32(2): 229–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais DC, Almeida AT (2007) Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(2): 441–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais DC, Almeida AT (2010) Water network rehabilitation: a group decision-making approach. Water SA 36(4): 487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais DC, Almeida AT (2012) Group decision making on water resources based on analysis of individual rankings. Omega 40: 42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais DC, Cavalcante CAV, Almeida AT (2010) Prioritization of areas of loss control in water distribution networks. Pesquisa Operacional 30(1): 15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemery P (2008) Extensions of the FlowSort sorting method for group decision-making. In: 19th International conference on multiple criteria decision making (MCDM 2008), Auckland

  • Parreiras R, Ekel P, Morais D (2011) Fuzzy set based consensus schemes for multicriteria group decision making applied to strategic planning. Group Decis Negot 21(2): 153–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldarriaga JG, Ochoa S, Moreno ME, Romero N, Cortés OJ (2010) Prioritised rehabilitation of water distribution networks using dissipated power concept to reduce non-revenue water. Urban Water J 7(2): 121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva VBS, Morais DC, Almeida AT (2010) A multicriteria group decision model to support watershed committees in Brazil. Water Resour Manag 24: 4075–4091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tervonen T, Lahdelma R, Almeida Dias J, Figueira J, Salminen P (2007) SMAA-TRI: a parameter stability analysis method for ELECTRE-TRI. In: Linkov I, Kiker GA, Wenning RJ (eds) Environmental security in harbors and coastal areas. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security 2007

  • Tervonen T, Figueira JR, Lahdelma R, Dias JA, Salminen P (2009) A stochastic method for robustness analysis in sorting problems. Eur J Oper Res 192(1): 236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trojan F, Morais DC (2012) Prioritising alternatives for maintenance of water distribution networks: a group decision approach. Water SA 38(4): 555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vairavamoorthy K, Lumbers J (1998) Leakage reduction in water distribution systems: optimal valve control. J Hydraul Eng 124(11): 1146–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walski T, Bezts W, Posluszny ET, Weir M, Whitman BE (2006) Modeling leakage reduction through pressure control. J Am Water Works Assoc 98(4): 147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Wen Y, Li P (2007) The genetic-algorithm-enhanced blind system identification for water distribution pipeline leak detection. Meas Sci Technol 18(7): 2178–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W (1992) ELECTRE-TRI—aspects methodologiques et guide d’utilisation. Document du Lamsade 74

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Pernambuco, Cx. Postal 7462, Recife, PE, 50630-970, Brazil

    Danielle Costa Morais & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida

  2. CEG-IST, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Av. Rovisto Pais, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal

    José Rui Figueira

  3. LORIA, Nancy, France

    José Rui Figueira

Authors
  1. Danielle Costa Morais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José Rui Figueira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle Costa Morais.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morais, D.C., de Almeida, A.T. & Figueira, J.R. A Sorting Model for Group Decision Making: A Case Study of Water Losses in Brazil. Group Decis Negot 23, 937–960 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9321-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9321-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation