Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1103–1127 | Cite as

An Integrated Group Decision Making Support Model for Corporate Financing Decisions

  • Wen-Hsien TsaiEmail author
  • Ching-Chien Yang
  • Jun-Der Leu
  • Ya-Fen Lee
  • Chih-Hao Yang


The essential goal of corporate finance is to maximize corporate value while reducing a firm’s financial risks. Corporate financing decision is a kind of multi-criteria based group decision making that embodies major approaches to handle qualitative criteria and quantitative limitations. However, in literature related to financing decision making, very little research uses decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and analytic network process (ANP) methods to consider the impact and dependency of its factors, or uses Goal programming (GP) to find the satisfactory financing decision under the related financial constraints. This study proposes an integrated group decision making support (GDMS) model to assist corporate financing group decision makers (DMs) in obtaining a satisfactory group solution. ANP, DEMATEL and GP are combined in this GDMS model. By using this model, the group DMs can systemically structure a multi-criteria network framework and derive priority weights of those criteria, and then deal with the quantitative financial constraints for a satisfactory group solution. An illustrative case is demonstrated for the effectiveness and practicability of this GDMS model.


Group decision making support (GDMS) Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) Analytic network process(ANP) Goal programming (GP) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aghion P, Bolton P (1992) An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting. Rev Econ Stud 59: 473–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker M, Wurgler J (2000) The equity share in new issues and aggregate stock returns. J Finance 55(5): 2219–2257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker M, Wurgler J (2002) Market timing and capital structure. J Finance 57(1): 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beynon MJ (2006) The role of the DS/AHP in identifying inter-group alliances and majority rule within group decision making. Group Decis Negotiat 15: 21–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolton P, Thadden EL (1998) Blocks, liquidity and corporate control. J Finance 53(1): 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley M, Jarrell G, Kim EH (1984) On the existence of an optimal capital structure: theory and evidence. J Finance 39(3): 857–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brander J, Lewis T (1986) Oligopoly and financial structure: the limited liability effect. Am Econ Rev 76: 956–970Google Scholar
  8. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management model and industrial application of linear programming, vols 1,2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Chou Y-C, Sun C-C, Yen H-Y (2012) Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Appl Soft Comput 12(1): 64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewatripont M, Tirole J (1994) A theory of debt and equity: diversity of securities and manager-shareholder congruence. Q J Econ 109: 1027–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond D (1991) Debt maturity structure and liquidity risk. Q J Econ 106: 709–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dymowa L (2011) MCDM with applications in economics and finance. In: chapter 4 Soft computing in economics and finance. Intelligent systems reference library, vol 6, edited by Kacprzyk J, Jain LC. Springer, Berlin, pp 107-186Google Scholar
  13. Fisher EO, Heinkel R, Zechner J (1989) Dynamic capital structure choice: theory and tests. J Finance 44(1): 19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flannery M (1986) Asymmetric information and risk debt maturity structure choice. J Finance 41: 19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fluck Z (1999a) Capital structure decisions in small and large firms: a life-cycle theory of financing, Working paper, New York UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Fluck Z (1999b) The dynamics of the management shareholder conflict. Rev Financial Stud 12: 379–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graham JR, Harvey C (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J Financial Econ 60: 187–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green R (1984) Investment incentives, debt, and warrants. J Financial Econ 13: 115–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallikainen P, Kimpimaki H, Kivijarvi H (2006) Supporting the module sequencing decision in the ERP implementation process. In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii international conference on system sciencesGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansmann H (1988) Ownership of the firm. J Law Organ 4(2): 267–304Google Scholar
  21. Harris M, Raviv A (1988) Corporate control contests and capital structure. J Financial Econ 20: 55–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heaton JB (2002) Managerial optimism and corporate finance. Financial Manag 31: 33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ho W-RJ, Tsai C-L, Tzeng G-H, Fang S-K (2011) Combined DEMATEL technique With a novel MCDM model for exploring Portfolio selection based on CAPM. Expert Syst Appl 38(1): 16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hori S, Shimizu Y (1999) Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems. Control Eng Pract 7: 1413–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iz PH, Jelassi MT (1990) An interactive group decision aid for multi-objective problems: an empirical assessment. Int J Manag Sci 6(18): 245–253Google Scholar
  26. Jensen M, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J Financial Econ 3(4): 305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones DF, Tamiz M, Mirrazavi SK (1998) Intelligent solution and analysis of goal programmes: the GPSYS system. Decis Support Syst 23(4): 329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karsak EE, Sozer S, Alptekin SE (2002) Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Comput Ind Eng 44: 171–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korhonen P, Wallenius J (1990) A multiple objective linear programming decision support system. Decis Support Syst 6: 243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kujačić M, Bojović NJ (2003) Organizational design of post corporation structure using fuzzy multicriteria decision making. Comput Math Organ Theory 9(1): 5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee W-S, Tzeng G-H, Cheng C-M (2009a) Using novel MCDM methods based on Fama-French three-factor model for probing the stock selection, APIEMS2009. Kitakyushu, Dec 14–16Google Scholar
  32. Lee W-S, Tzeng G-H, Guan J-L, Chien K-T, Huang J-M (2009b) Combined MCDM techniques for exploring stock selection based on Gordon model. Expert Syst Appl 36(3): 6421–6430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lemmon ML, Zender JF (2004) Debt capacity and tests of capital structure theories. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  34. Loughran T, Ritter JR (1995) The new issues puzzle. J Finance 50: 23–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu J, Quaddus MA (2001) Integrating knowledge based guidance system with multiple objective decision making. N Z J Appl Comput Inf Technol 1(5): 53–59Google Scholar
  36. Lucas DJ, McDonald RL (1990) Equity issues and stock price dynamics. J Finance 45(4): 1019–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marques MO, Coutinho dos Santos MJ (2004) Capital structure policy and determinants: theory and managerial evidence. EFMA 2004 Basel Meetings PaperGoogle Scholar
  38. Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, organization and management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller M (1977) Debt and taxes. J Finance 32: 261–275Google Scholar
  40. Modigliani F, Miller M (1958) The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment. Am Econ Rev 48(3): 261–297Google Scholar
  41. Moreno-Jiménez JM, Aguarón J, Raluy A, Turón A (2005) A spreadsheet module for consensus building in AHP group decision making. Group Decis Negotiat 14(2): 89–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moreno-Jiménez JM, Aguarón J, Escobar MT (2008) The core of consistency in AHP-group decision making. Group Decis Negotiat 17(3): 249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers S (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financial Econ 5(2): 147–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Myers S (1984) The capital structure puzzle. J Finance 39(3): 575–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Myers S (1993) Still searching for optimal capital structure. Cont Bank J Appl Corp Finance 6(1): 4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Myers S, Majluf N (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firm have information investors do not have. J Financial Econ 13: 187–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pal BB, Moitra BN, Maulik U (2003) A goal programming procedure for fuzzy multiobjective linear fractional programming problem. Fuzzy Set Syst 139: 395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pinegar JM, Wilbricht L (1989) What managers think of capital structure theory: a survey. Financial Manag 18: 82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roberts MR, Sufi A (2007) Control rights and capital structure: an empirical investigation. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  50. Romero C (2001) Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach. Omega 29: 63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process, planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Saaty TL (2001) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process (2nd edn). RWS Publications, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  53. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1998) Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: bayes theorem and the analytic hierarchy process. Oper Res 46(4): 491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sarkis J (2003) Quantitative models for performance measurement systems—alternate considerations. Int J Prod Econ 86: 81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schinas OD (2005) Application of multi criteria decision making techniques in finance: the case of the Greek coastal shipping companies. Doctoral Dissertation, Division of Ship Design and Maritime Transport, School of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering, National Technical University of AthensGoogle Scholar
  56. Scott J (1976) A theory of optimal capital structure. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 7: 33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shyur HJ (2003) A semi-structured process for ERP systems evaluation: applying analytic network process. J E-Bus 5(1): 33–49Google Scholar
  58. Spronk J, Steuer RE, Zopounidis C (2005) Multicriteria decision aid/analysis in finance. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Chapter 20, multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin, pp 799–858Google Scholar
  59. Steuer RE, Na P (2003) Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: a categorized bibliographic study. Eur J Oper Res 150(3): 496–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stulz R (1988) Managerial control of voting rights, financing policies and the market for corporate control. J Financial Econ 20: 25–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tamura H, Akazawa K, Nagata H (2002) Structural modeling of uneasy factors for creating safe, secure and reliable society. SICE Syst Integr Div Annu Conf 330–340Google Scholar
  62. Tamura H, Nagata H, Akazawa K (2003) Structural modeling and systems analysis of various factors for realizing safe, secure and reliable society. International Conference on Decision Support for Telecommunications and Information SocietyGoogle Scholar
  63. Titman S (1984) The effect of capital structure on a firm’s liquidation decision. J Financial Econ 13: 137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tsai W-H, Chou W-C (2009) Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: a novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Syst Appl 36(2): 1444–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tsai W-H, Hsu J-L (2008) Corporate social responsibility programs choice and costs assessment in the airline industry—a hybrid model. J Air Transp Manag 14(4): 188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tsai W-H, Chou W-C, Lai C-W (2010) An effective evaluation model and improvement analysis for national parks websites: a case study of Taiwan. Tour Manag 36(6): 936–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tsai W-H, Lee P-L, Shen Y-S, Hwang E.T.Y. Hwang (2011) A combined evaluation model for encouraging entrepreneurship policies. Ann Oper Res. Available online 7 Dec 2011. doi: 10.1007/s10479-011-1029-6
  68. Xiang L (2009) A multiple criteria decision-making method for enterprise supply chain finance coperative systems. In: 2009 Fourth international conference on systems, Gosier, Guadeloupe, March 1–6, pp 120–125Google Scholar
  69. Xidonas P, Askounis D, Psarras J (2009) Common stock Portfolio selection: a multiple criteria decision making methodology and an application to the Athens stock exchange. Oper Res 9(1): 55–79Google Scholar
  70. Yamazaki M, Ishibe K, Yamashita S, Miyamoto I, Kurihara M, Shindo H (1997) An analysis of obstructive factors to welfare service using DEMATEL method. Rep Fac Eng Yamanashi Univ 48: 25–30Google Scholar
  71. Zhang GQ, Lu J (2003) An integrated group decision-making method dealing with fuzzy preferences for alternatives and individual judgments for selection criteria. Group Decis Negotiat 12: 501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (2002) Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review. J Multi-criteria Decis Anal 11(4–5): 167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zwiebel J (1996) Dynamic capital structure under managerial entrenchment. Am Econ Rev 86: 1197–1215Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen-Hsien Tsai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ching-Chien Yang
    • 2
  • Jun-Der Leu
    • 1
  • Ya-Fen Lee
    • 1
  • Chih-Hao Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationNational Central UniversityJhongli, TaoyuanTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Marketing and Logistics ManagementChung Chou University of Science and TechnologyYuanlin, ChanghuaTaiwan

Personalised recommendations