Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 359–377 | Cite as

The Effects of Team Flexibility and Emotional Intelligence on Software Development Performance

Article

Abstract

As both business and technological environments change at an increasing rate, flexibility and emotional intelligence have become critical issues for project management. Even though previous research has examined the relationship between team flexibility and team performance and that between the emotional intelligence of teams and team outputs, there remains a gap in literature in respect to a holistic model. Accordingly in this paper, we examine the relationships among software team flexibility, emotional intelligence, and software project outputs (market success, speed to market, and the functionality of the new software product) using survey data from 86 software development projects. The results reveal positive a relationship between the diversity dimension of software project team flexibility and emotional intelligence. The first dimension of software team flexibility, team autonomy, positively affected market success, speed to market, and software functionality, whereas the second dimension, team diversity, positively affected only speed to market and software functionality. The emotional recognition of team members for both themselves and their teammates appears to be another important factor affecting the speed to market and functionality of the new software products. Managerial and theoretical implications of the study are discussed.

Keywords

Team flexibility Team autonomy Team diversity Emotional intelligence Software project performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerjordet K, Severinsson E (2004) Emotional intelligence in mental health nurses talking about practice. Int J Ment Health Nurs 13: 164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akgün AE, Keskin H, Byrne JC, Aren S (2007) Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation 27: 501–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akgün AE, Keskin H, Byrne J (2009) Organizatinal emotional capability, product and process innovation, and firm performance: an empirical analysis. J Eng Technol Manag 26: 103–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akgün AE, Keskin H, Byrne JC, Gunsel A (2011) Antecedents and results of emotional capability in software development project teams. J Prod Innov Manag. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00845.x
  5. Anand G, Ward PT (2004) Fit, flexibility and performance in manufacturing: coping with dynamic environments. Prod Oper Manag 13(4): 369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashforth BE, Humphrey RH (1993) Emotional labor in service roles: the influence of identity. Acad Manag Rev 18(1): 88–115Google Scholar
  7. Athey S, Schmutzler A (1995) Product and process flexibility in an innovative environment. RAND J Econ 26(4): 557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barki H, Rivard S, Talbot J (2001) An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. J Manag Inf Syst 17(4): 37–69Google Scholar
  9. Benamati J, Lederer AL (2001) Coping with rapid changes in IT. Commun ACM 44(8): 83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byrd TA, Turner ED (2001) An exploratory analysis of the value of the skills of IT personnel: their relationship to IS infrastructure and competitive advantage. Decis Sci 32(1): 21–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caruso DR, Mayer JD, Salovey P (2002) Relation of an ability measure of emotional intelligence to personality. J Pers Assess 79(2): 306–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chin W (2001) Pls-graph user’s guide version 3.0. C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1987) New products: what separates winners from losers?. J Product Innov Manag 4: 169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper R, Sawaf A (1997) Executive EQ. Orion Business, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Coté S, Miners CTH (2006) Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Adm Sci Q 51: 1–28Google Scholar
  16. Coté S (2005) A social interaction model of the effects of emotion regulation on work strain. Acad Manag Rev 30(3): 509–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Das TK, Elango B (1995) Managing strategic flexibility: key to effective performance. J General Manag 20(3): 60–75Google Scholar
  18. Evans JS (1991) Strategic flexibility for high technology manoeuvres: a conceptual framework. J Manag Stud 28: 69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 48: 39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gallivan MJ (2003) The influence of software developers’ creative style on their attitudes to and assimilation of a software process innovation. Inf Manag 40(5): 443–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia-prieto SP, Tran V, Schneider S (2007) The role of emotion in strategic issue interpretation: the case of diversity. Working papers, CEB 07-036.RS, ULB-Universite Libre de BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  22. Gefen D, Ridings C (2002) Implementation team responsiveness and user evaluation of CRM: a quasi-experimental design study of social exchange theory. J Manag Inf Syst, Special Issue on ERP (19:1): 47–63Google Scholar
  23. Gerwin D, Moffat LK (1997) Withdrawal of team autonomy during concurrent engineering. Manag Sci 43(9): 1275–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Georgsdottir AS, Getz I (2004) How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations. Creativity Innov Manag 13(3): 166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griffin A (1997) The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. J Mark Res 34(1): Special Issue on Innovation and New Products, pp 24–35Google Scholar
  26. Hackman JR (1987) The design of work teams. In: Lorsch JW (eds) Handbook of organizational behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 315–342Google Scholar
  27. Henkin S (2006) The behavioral side of project team effectiveness. http://www.prismls.com/PDF_docs/Behavior.side.of.team.effectiveness.pdf
  28. Hillson D (2003) Assessing organisational project management capability. J Facil Manag 2(3): 298–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hirokawa RY, Degooyer D, Valde K (2000) Using narratives to study task group effectiveness. Small Group Res 31(5): 573–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoegl M, Parboteeah KP (2007a) Creativity-relevant skills and the task performance of innovation teams: how teamwork maters. J Eng Technol Manag 24: 148–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoegl M, Parboteeah KP (2007b) Creativity in innovative projects: how teamwork matters. J Eng Technol Manag 24: 148–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huy QN (1999) Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Acad Manag Rev 24(2): 325–345Google Scholar
  33. Imai K, Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1988) Managing the new product development process: how Japanese companies learn and unlearn. In: Tushman M, Moore WL (eds) Reading in the management of innovation. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Inkpen A (1992) Learning and collaboration: an examination of North American-Japanese joint ventures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones CB (2005) Behavioral flexibility in primates: causes and consequences. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Jordan PJ, Ashkanasy NM, Hartel CEJ (2002) Emotional intelligence as a moderator of emotional and behavioral reactions to job insecurity. Acad Manag Rev 27(3): 361–372Google Scholar
  37. Jordan PJ, Troth AC (2004) Managing emotions during team problem solving: emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Hum Perform 17(2): 195–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelly JR, Barsade SG (2001) Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 86(1): 99–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kessler E, Chakrabarti A (1999) Speeding up the pace of new product development. J Pord Innov Manag 16: 231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kleijnen M, Ruyter KD, Wetzels M (2007) An assessment of value creation in mobile service delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness. J Retail 83: 33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koch N (2006) Transformation techniques in the model-driven development process of UWE. In: Proceedings of the 2nd model-driven web engineering 2006 workshop (MDWE’06), ACM DL, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee G, Xia W (2005) The ability of information systems development project teams to respond to business and technology changes: a study of flexibility measures. Eur J Inf Syst 14(1): 75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee G, Xia W (2007) Relationships between software team flexibility, autonomy, diversity, and project performance. In: The 67th academy of management best 3 paper proceedings, Philadelphia. OCIS first Runner-up Best Paper AwardGoogle Scholar
  44. Li Y, Chang K-C, Chen H-G, Jiang JJ (2010) Software development team flexibility antecedents. J Syst Softw 83: 1726–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manag Rev 21(1): 135–172Google Scholar
  46. Mayer JD, Salovey P (1995) Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Appl Prev Psychol 4: 197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayer JD, Perkins DM, Caruso DR, Salovey P (2000) Emotional intelligence and giftedness. Roeper Rev 23(3): 131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McComb SA, Green SG, Compton WD (2007) Team flexibility’s relationship to staffing and performance in complex projects: An empirical analysis. J Eng Technol Manag 24(4): 293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mohr J, Spekman R (1994) Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strateg Manag J 15(2): 135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nelson KM, Ghods M (1998) Measuring technology flexibility. Eur J Inf Syst 7(4): 232–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nicholson B, Sahay S (2004) Embedded knowledge and offshore software development. Inf Org 14(4): 329–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ostell A (1996) Managing dysfunctional emotions in organizations. J Manag Stud 33(4 July): 524–557Google Scholar
  53. Pindyck RS (1991) Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. J Econ Lit 29(3): 1110–1148Google Scholar
  54. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5): 879–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reed K, Blunsdon B (1998) Organizational flexibility in Australia. Int J Hum Resour Manag :457–477, Routlege, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Reus TH, Liu Y (2004) Rhyme and reason: emotional capability and the performance of knowledge-intensive work groups. Hum Perf 17(2): 245–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rubin RS, Munz DC, Bommer WH (2005) Leading from within: the effects of emotion recognation and personality on transformational leadership behavior. Acad Manag J 48(5): 845–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sala F (2005) Making the business case: emotional intelligence competencies and important business outcomes. In: Druskat V, Sala F, Mount G (eds) Linking emotional intelligence and performance at work: current research evidence. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  59. Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA, Blickensderfer EL (1993) Team performance and training research: emerging principles. J Wash Acad Sci 83(2): 81–106Google Scholar
  60. Salovey P, Mayer JD, Goldman SL, Turvey C, Palfai TP (1995) Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: exploring emotional intelligence using the trait meta-mood scale. In: Pennebaker JW (ed) Emotion, disclosure, and health. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 125–154Google Scholar
  61. Salovey P, Pizarro DA (2003) The value of emotional intelligence. In: Sternberg RJ, Lautrey J, Lubart T (eds) Models of intelligence: international perspectives. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 263–278Google Scholar
  62. Sanchez R (1995) Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strateg Manag J 16(summer special issue): 135–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwaber K (1995) SCRUM development process. In: Proceedings of the conference on object-oriented programing systems, languages, and applications (OOPSLA’95) workshop on business object design and implementation, available online at. http://jeffsutherland.com/oopsla/schwapub.pdf
  64. Sethi R (2000) New product quality and product development teams. J Market 64(2): 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Swezey RW, Salas E (1992) Guidelines for use in team-training development. In: Swezey RW, Salas E (eds) Teams: their training and performance. Ablex, Norwood, pp 219–245Google Scholar
  66. Slack KM (1983) Social administration digest. J Soc Policy 12: 395–410. doi:10.1017/S0047279400012939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tan C, Sia SK (2006) Managing flexibility in outsourcing. J Assoc Inf Syst (United States) 7(4): 179–206Google Scholar
  68. The Standish Group International (2001) Extreme CHAOS. The Standish Group InternationalGoogle Scholar
  69. Volberda HW (1996) Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Org Sci 7(4): 359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wolff SB, Pescosolido AT, Druskat VU (2002) Emotional intelligence as the basis of leadership emergence in self-managing teams. Leadersh Q 13: 505–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wong C-S, Law KS (2002) The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: an exploratory study. Leadersh Q 13: 243–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Young-Ybarra C, Wiersema M (1999) Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: the influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theories. Org Sci 10(4): 439–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Admistrative SciencesKocaeli UniversityKocaeliTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and Administrative SciencesFatih UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations