Skip to main content
Log in

A Case Study of Group Decision Method for Environmental Foresight and Water Resources Planning Using a Fuzzy Approach

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group decision-making (i.e., multi-expert) is an important subject in planning water resources. The inherent complexity and uncertainty of real world urge many experts to be involved in decision-making processes. This paper presents an application of the linguistic-label aggregation method in a real-life case study. The case was taken from a foresight exercise in Colombia (South America) concerning environmental and water resources planning in a river basin. The group decision-making problem is solved using a four-step approach based on (i) the evaluation of experts’ opinions, (ii) the aggregation of opinions for each alternative, (iii) fuzzy ranking, and (iv) final assessment. Two main issues that are new in our work is that we consider temporal linguistic labels and a fuzzy ranking procedure that is able to include the mean, the standard deviation, the fuzzy membership function and the frequency of experts’ opinions for each alternative. The approach is developed and implemented on a computational tool. Results show an efficient decision-making process, that is, the tool demonstrated to deal with shortest time frames and to increase the efficiency of the planning resources, mainly because allows the decision manager to focus on the establishment of criteria. The latter also leads to objectivity and eases the identification and discussion of elements of consensus in decisions that otherwise may be embedded in individuals’ interests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi M, Keen PG (1989) Business teams in an information age. Inf Soc 6(4): 179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri E, Medina J (2000) Scenarios as seen from human and social perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change 65: 49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera E, Escobar J (2003) A fuzzy approach for Delphi method (in Spanish). Ingeniería Desarrollo 14: 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh D, Chen Z (2006) Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 36(3): 558–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boclin ASC, de Mello R (2005) A decision support method for environmental impact assessment using fuzzy approach. Ecol Econ 58: 170–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson C, Fuller R (2000a) Benchmarking and linguistic importance weighted aggregations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114: 35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson C, Fuller R (2000b) Multiobjective linguistic optimization. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115: 5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang PT, Lee ES (1994) Ranking of fuzzy sets based on the concept of existence. Comput Math Appl 27: 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SJ, Chen SM (2005) Aggregating fuzzy opinions in the heterogeneous group decision-making environment. Cybern Syst 36: 309–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Degani R, Bortolan G (1988) The problem of linguistic approximation in clinical decision making. Int J Approx Reason 2(2): 143–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado M, Verdegay JL, Vila MA (1992) Linguistic decision making models. Int J Intell Syst 7: 479–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado M, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L (1998) Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision. Inf Sci 107: 177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepting DH (2007) Decision support for local environmental impact assessment. Environ Modell Softw 22(4): 436–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1995) A sequential selection process in group decision making with a linguistic assessment-approach. Inf Sci 85: 223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996a) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78: 73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996b) Direct approach processes in group decision making under linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79: 175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1997) Aggregation operators for linguistic weighted information. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 27(5): 646–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1997) A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 88: 31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1998) Choice processes for non-homogeneous group decision making under linguistic setting. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94: 287–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000a) Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 120: 144–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000b) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115: 67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2001) A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 31: 227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L, Sánchez PJ (2005) Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 166: 115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heske T, Heske JN (1999) Fuzzy logic for real world design. Annabooks. (ISBN:978-0929392240)

  • Hwang CL, Lin M (1987) Group decision making under multiple criteria: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J (1986) Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 18: 105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karacapilidis N, Gordon T (1995) Dialectical planning. In: Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Montreal, pp 239–250

  • Landeta J (2006) Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73: 467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee ES, Li RJ (1988) Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events. Comput Math Appl 15: 887–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Kwang H, Lee J (1999) Method for ranking fuzzy numbers and its application to decision-making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 7: 677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu KFR, Lai JH (2009) Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Syst Appl 36(3): 5119–5136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CM, Wang MJ, Pang YS (1994) A multiple criteria linguistic decision making model (MCLDM) for human decision making. Eur J Oper Res 76: 466–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peche R, Rodríguez E (2009) Environmental impact assessment procedure: a new approach based on fuzzy logic. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29(5): 275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinaxi (2004) Construcción participativa de los escenarios de prospección para el plan de ordenación de la Cuenca del río La Miel (project executed). http://www.quinaxi.org/proyectos/proyectos.shtml

  • Wang RC, Chu SJ (2004) Group decision-making using fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility of a manufacturing system. Eur J Oper Res 154: 563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhardt C, Seifert S (2010) Developments in GDN research: introduction. Group Decis Negotiat 19(2): 107–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2004a) Uncertain multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2004b) A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 166: 19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2005) Deviation measures of linguistic preferences relations in group decision making. Omega 33: 249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2006) A practical procedure for group decision making under incomplete multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Group Decis Negotiat 15: 581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1984) On different classes of linguistic variables defined via fuzzy subsets. Kybernetes 13: 103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2004) On the retranslation process in Zadeh’s parading of computing with words. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 34: 1184–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1983) A computational approach for fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comput Math Appl 9: 149–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Lu J (2003) An integrated group decision-making method dealing with fuzzy preferences for alternatives and individual judgments for selection criteria. Group Decis Negotiat 12: 501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jairo R. Montoya-Torres.

Additional information

To Group Decision and Negotiation journal, special issue on “Group Decision and Negotiation in Latin America: Practice and Methodological Issues”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halabi, A.X., Montoya-Torres, J.R. & Obregón, N. A Case Study of Group Decision Method for Environmental Foresight and Water Resources Planning Using a Fuzzy Approach. Group Decis Negot 21, 205–232 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-011-9269-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-011-9269-z

Keywords

Navigation