Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 571–583 | Cite as

Using Games in Community Disaster Prevention Exercises

  • Katsuya YamoriEmail author


Currently, there is a growing interest in disaster prevention exercises such as games, debates, workshops, and “town walks” that involve the active participation of community members as an alternative to seminars in which disaster prevention experts simply share their knowledge and skills. We have developed a disaster prevention game called Crossroad for use in local disaster prevention programs. It is a group learning game, in which players read cards with a scenario written on each card. The scenarios were derived from extensive, focus-group interviews with disaster veterans of the Kobe Earthquake of 1995 that killed more than 6400 people and described the dilemmas faced by these veterans. To deal with the dilemma, each player was required to make a “Yes” or No decision on two conflicting alternatives. We used Crossroad as a part of tsunami disaster prevention, community-building workshops for citizens of Kishiwada city in Osaka, Japan. The results suggested the importance of motivating local people to find a socially “viable” solution through their own strength, rather than forcing a community to accept a universally “correct” solution prescribed in advance by outsiders. It is concluded that the Crossroad game can be used effectively as a new communication medium to promote the active participation of community members.


Disaster prevention Game Workshop Community Socially viable solution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Na J, Okada N, Fang L (2009) A collaborative action development approach to improving community disaster reduction by the Yonmenkaigi workshop method. J Nat Disaster Sci 30: 57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Okada N (2008) Lively communities: how to live independently. Japan Civil Engineering Consultants Association, Research Institute of Infrastructure Management (RIIM). Rim Report 6: 25–33Google Scholar
  3. Shiwaku R, Shaw R (2008) Proactive co-learning: a new paradigm in disaster education. Disaster Prev Manag 17: 183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Watanabe T (1999) Preventing disaster without saying disaster prevention: A case study of disaster prevention program in Japan. World Bank Institute Distance Learning. Retrieved January 10, 2008, [from]
  5. Yamori K (2007) Disaster risk sense in Japan and gaming approach to risk communication. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 25: 101–131Google Scholar
  6. Yamori K (2008) Narrative mode of thought in disaster damage reduction: A Crossroad of narrative and gaming approach. In: Sugiman T, Gergen K, Wagner W, Yamada Y (eds) Meaning in action: constructions, narratives and representations. Springer, Tokyo, pp 241–252Google Scholar
  7. Yamori K (2009) Action research on disaster reduction education: building a “community of practice” through a gaming approach. J Nat Disaster Sci 30: 83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations