Skip to main content

Cultural Differentiation of Negotiating Agents

Abstract

Negotiations proceed differently across cultures. For realistic modeling of agents in multicultural negotiations, the agents must display culturally differentiated behavior. This paper presents an agent-based simulation model that tackles these challenges, based on Hofstede’s model of national cultures. The context is a trade network for goods with a hidden quality attribute. The negotiation model is based on the ABMP negotiation architecture and applies a utility function that includes market value, quality preference and risk attitude. The five dimensions of Hofstede’s model are the basis for the modification of ABMP parameters and weight factors in the utility function. The agents can observe each other’s group membership and status. This information is used, along with the indices of Hofstede’s dimensions, to differentiate behavior in different cultural settings. The paper presents results of test runs that verify the implementation of the model. The model helps to explain behaviors of actors in international trade networks. It proves that Hofstede’s dimensions can be used to generate culturally differentiated agents. Further validations of the model with case studies from literature and experiments have yet to be conducted. Extensions can make this model a useful tool for training traders who engage in cross-cultural negotiation and for implementation in negotiation support systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Adair W, Brett J, Lempereur A, Okumura T, Shikhirev P, Tinsley C, Lytle A (2004) Culture and negotiation strategy. Negot J 20: 87–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosse T, Jonker CM, Treur J (2004) Experiments in human multi-issue negotiation: analysis and support. In: Proceedings of the third international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pp 672–679

  • Brett JM, Okumura T (1998) Inter- and intracultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Acad Manag J 41: 495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coehoorn RM, Jennings NR (2004) Learning an opponent’s preferences to make effective multi-issue negotiation trade-offs. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on e-commerce, pp 59–68

  • de Rosis F, Pelachaud C, Poggi I (2004) Transcultural believability in embodied agents: a matter of consistent adaptation. In: Payr S, Trappl R (eds) Agent Culture. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 75–105

  • Faratin P, Sierra C, Jennings NR (1998) Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robo Auton Syst 24: 159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand MJ, Brett JM (2004) The handbook of negotiation and culture. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham JL, Mintu AT, Rodgers W (1994) Exploration of negotiation behaviors in ten foreign countries using a model developed in the United States. Manag Sci 40:72–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindriks K, Tykhonov D (2008) Opponent modeling in automated multi-issue negotiation using Bayesian learning. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pp 331–338

  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s Consequences. 2. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ (2005) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, third millennium edition. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Meijer S, Verwaart T (2006) Modeling trade and trust across cultures. In: Stølen K, et al (eds) Trust management: 4th international conference, iTrust 2006. Springer-Verlag, pp 120–134

  • Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Verwaart T (2008a) Individualism and collectivism in trade agents. In: Nguyen NT, et al (eds) New frontiers in applied artificial intelligence, IEA/AIE 2008. Springer-Verlag, pp 492–502

  • Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Verwaart T (2008b) Modeling culture in trade: uncertainty avoidance. In: 2008 Agent-directed simulation symposium (ADSS’08), Spring Simulation Multiconference 2008. SCS, pp 143–150

  • Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Verwaart T (2008c) Long-term orientation in trade. In: Schredelseker K, Hauser F (eds) Complexity and artificial markets. Springer, pp 107–118

  • Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Verwaart T (2009) Modeling power distance in trade. In: David N, Sichman JS (eds) Multi-agent-based simulation IX, international workshop, MABS 2008, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, pp 1–16

  • Jonker CM, Treur J (2001) An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation. In: Nebel B (ed) Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on AI, IJCAI ‘01, pp 1195–1201

  • Kumar R, Worm V (2004) Institutional dynamics and the negotiation process: comparing India and China. Int J Confl Manag 15: 304–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer S, Hofstede GJ, Beers G, Omta SWF (2006) Trust and tracing game: learning about transactions and embeddedness in a trade network. Prod Plan Control 17: 569–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf LE, Bird A, Shankarmahesh M, Aycan Z, Larimo J, Valdelamar DD (2006) Cultural tendencies in negotiation: a comparison of Finland, India, Mexico, Turkey and the United States. J World Bus 41: 382–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A (1994) A course in game theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa H, Richardson J, Metcalfe D (2002) Negotiation analysis: the science and art of collaborative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (2004) Nations, cultures, and individuals: new perspectives and old dilemmas. J Cross-Cult Psychol 35: 50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson LL (2005) The mind and heart of the negotiator. 3. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Tykhonov D, Jonker C, Meijer S, Verwaart T (2008) Agent-based simulation of the trust and tracing game for supply chains and networks. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 11(3):1 http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/3/1.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Verwaart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M. & Verwaart, T. Cultural Differentiation of Negotiating Agents. Group Decis Negot 21, 79–98 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-010-9190-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-010-9190-x

Keywords

  • Multi-agent simulation
  • Culture
  • Bargaining
  • Negotiation
  • Trade network