Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancing National Security and Energy Security in the Post-911 Era: Group Decision Support for Strategic Policy Analysis under Conditions of Conflict

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy source diversity has become a fundamental principle of both US energy security and national security. The decision of whether or not to approve a new power plant facility in the US involves complex group decision and negotiation processes. These contentious, value-laden, and multi-faceted self organizing processes involve many decision makers (broad constituencies) with conflicting priorities and dynamic preferences, high decision stakes, limited technical information (both in terms of quality and quantity), and difficult tradeoffs. As population pressures and energy demands continue to mount, advances in conflict resolution can help to improve power plant siting processes as well as US energy security and national security. Specifically, this paper uses advances in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution and its associated decision support system (DSS) GMCR II to analyze strategic aspects of a multi-party energy dispute involving the co-management of a shared air shed in the Fraser Lowland Eco-Region based on Sumas Energy 2 (SE2), a contentious power plant project proposed for the US side of the international border between the city of Abbotsford, British Columbia and town of Sumas, Washington. GMCR II provides strategic insights for enhancing energy security, national security, and environmental risk management in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buckley PH, Belec J (2005) Issues of cross border management of the Fraser Lowland eco-region. In: Proceedings of CNS-ACSUS convergence and divergence colloquium, Vancouver, pp 221–233

  • Clarke RA (2008) Your government failed you: breaking the cycle of national security disasters. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSEC (2001) Council Order No. 754, p. 13. 2001. http://www.efsec.wa.gov/Sumas2/order754.pdf, p. 1. Last accessed 22 June 2008

  • EFSEC (2008) About EFSEC: the Washington State energy facility site evaluation council. http://www.efsec.wa.gov/kittitaswind/aboutefsecpdf.pdf. Last accessed 22 June 2008

  • Fang L, Hipel KW, Kilgour KW (1993) Interactive decision making: the graph model for conflict resolution. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang LP, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Peng X (2003a) A decision support system for interactive decision making, part 1: model formulation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 33(1): 42–55. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2003.809361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang LP, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Peng X (2003b) A decision support system for interactive decision making, part 2: analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 33(1): 56–66. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2003.809360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser Health Authority (2002) Preliminary summary of data from the Canadian community health survey, British Columbia: Fraser Health Authority. June 2002

  • Fraser NM, Hipel KW (1984) Conflict analysis: models and resolutions. North-Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser NM, Hipel KW (1988) Decision support systems for conflict analysis. In: Singh MG, Hindi K, Salassa D (eds) Managerial decision support systems, proceedings of the IMACS/IFORS 1st international colloquium on managerial decision support systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 13–21

  • Hebert J (2008) Wednesday, Jun. 25, 2008, Report: energy demand will grow. Associated Press, Washington

  • Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Fang L, Peng X (1997) The decision support system GMCR in environmental conflict management. Appl Math Comput 83(2–3): 117–152. doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(96)00170-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornick E (2008) McCain: clean energy a ‘national security issue’. CNN Politics.com. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/13/mccain.environment/index.html. Last accessed 7 Oct 2008

  • Howard N (1971) Paradoxes of rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour DM, Hipel KW, Fang L (1987) The graph model for conflicts. Automatica 23(1): 41–55. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(87)90117-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labelle C (1998) The effects of smog on the health of Canadians, science and technology division. Library of Parliament, Government of Canada, PRG 98-4E, October, 1998. http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/library/PRBpubs/prb984-e.htm. Last accessed 22 June 2008

  • Li KW, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2004) Status quo analysis of the Flathead River conflict. Water Resour Res 40(5). Art No. W05S03). doi:10.1029/2003WR002596

  • Li KW, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2005) Status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution. J Oper Res Soc 56(6): 699–707. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Defense Council (2007) Addicted to Oil: ranking states’ oil vulnerability and solutions for change. July, 2007. http://docs.nrdc.org/air/air_07061901a.pdf. Last accessed 7 Oct 2008

  • Obama B (2006) Energy security is national security. Remarks of Senator Barrack Obama, Governor’s Ethanol Coalition, Washington, DC, February 28, 2006. http://obama.senate.gov/speech/060228-energy_security/. Last accessed 7 Oct 2008

  • Peng X (1999) A decision support system for conflict resolution. Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

  • Peng X, Hipel K, Kilgour D, Fang L (1997) Representing ordinal preferences in the decision support system GMCR II. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, vol 1, Orlando, FL, pp 809–814

  • Quinton J (2008) NSA plans mitigation for electrical facilities. Inside Charm City. Posted on January 6, 2008. http://insidecharmcity.com/2008/01/06/nsa-plans-mitigation-for-electrical-problems/

  • Spectrum: Newsletter of the Society Promoting Environmental Conservation (2001) Power to the people: environmentalists and local community activists nix Sumas 2 power plant, vol 29, Number 1, 2001, pp 4–5. http://www.spec.bc.ca/about/downloads/SpectrumVol29_No_1.pdf. Last accessed 22 June 2008

  • Sumas Energy 2 Generation Facility Air Quality Issue Summary (2000) BC ministry of environment, lands and parks, environment Canada—Pacific and Yukon Region and the Greater Vancouver regional district, September 11, 2000. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/air/airquality/pdfs/sumas2.pdf. Last accessed 22 June 2008

  • Thomson B (2004) Characterization of the Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Airshed. In: Droscher TW, Fraser DA (eds) Proceedings of the 2003 Georgia Basin/Puget sound research conference. CD-ROM or Online, 2004. http://www.psat.wa.gov/Publications/03_proceedings/start.htm. Last accessed 22 June 2008

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin D (2006) Ensuring energy security. Foreign Aff 85(2): 68–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin W. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, K.W., Levy, J.K. & Buckley, P. Enhancing National Security and Energy Security in the Post-911 Era: Group Decision Support for Strategic Policy Analysis under Conditions of Conflict. Group Decis Negot 18, 369–386 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9147-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9147-5

Keywords

Navigation