Advertisement

Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 449–465 | Cite as

Suppliers’ Participation in a Single Buyer Electronic Market

  • Sang M. Lee
  • Seong-Bae LimEmail author
  • Domingo Ribeiro Soriano
Article

Abstract

Business to business (B2B) is the fastest growing segment of the explosive growth of e-commerce. The purpose of this study is to identify internal factors which influence the supplier’s intention to adopt private exchange (PE), a single buyer side electronic market (EM). This study identified cost, flexibility, delivery, and quality as internal capabilities and investigated how these four factors influence suppliers’ participation in PE. The results of the study indicate the following: (1) suppliers do not believe that their capability to produce customized products for customers plays an important role in PE; (2) they still believe that standardized rather than engineered products would dominate the marketplace; and (3) a contractible factor like lower price, rather than non-contractible factors including superior flexibility of production capability, fast and reliable delivery, and quality, plays an important role in the PE.

Keywords

Private exchange EDI Value network Internal capabilities Adoption of electronic market 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman F, Franco L, Gallupe B, Parent M (2005) GSS for multi-organizational collaboration: reflections on process and content. Group Decis Negot 14: 307–331. doi: 10.1007/s10726-005-0317-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Qirim N (2005) An empirical investigation of an e-commerce adoption-capability model in small business in New Zealand. Electron Mark 15(4): 418–437. doi: 10.1080/10196780500303136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich D (1998) The new value chain. Information Week, 14 700: 278Google Scholar
  4. Allee V (2000) Reconfiguring the value network. J Bus Strategy 21(4): 36–39. doi: 10.1108/eb040103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aron R, Ungar L, Valluri A (2008) A model of market power and efficiency in private electronic exchanges. Eur J Oper Res 187: 922–942. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basole R, Rouse W (2008) Complexity of service value networks: conceptualization and empirical investigation. IBM Syst J 47(1): 53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke K (2005) The impact of firm size on internet use in small business. Electron Mark 15(4): 79–93. doi: 10.1080/10196780500083738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Business Week (2004) The information technology 100 (June 21)Google Scholar
  9. Business Week (2005) The global brands: annual ranking of the top 100 (August 4)Google Scholar
  10. Cap Gemini Ernist & Young (2001) Unraveling the private marketplace mystique. http://www.us.cgey.com. Accessed 30 Mar 2001
  11. Challis D, Samson D, Lawson B (2002) Integrated manufacturing, employee and business performance: Australian and New Zealand evidence. Int J Prod Res 40(8): 1941–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chwelos P, Benbasat I, Dexter A (2001) Research report: empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Inf Syst Res 12(3): 304–321. doi: 10.1287/isre.12.3.304.9708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Copacino W (1999) The emergence of value network. Logistics Management and Distribution Report. Radnor, PA (August)Google Scholar
  14. Cragg P, King M (1993) Small-firm computing: motivators and inhibitors. MIS Q 17(1): 47–60. doi: 10.2307/249509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fjeldstad Ø, Haanæs K (2001) Strategy tradeoffs in the knowledge and network economy. Bus Strategy Rev 12(1): 1–10. doi: 10.1111/1467-8616.00160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grandon E, Pearson M (2004) E-commerce adoption: perception of managers/owners of small and medium sized firms in Chile. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 15: 81–102Google Scholar
  17. Group J, Christy D (1999) A model of supplier response to just-in-time delivery requirements. Group Decis Negot 8: 139–156. doi: 10.1023/A:1008634008759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart P, Saunders C (1997) Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organ Sci 8(1): 23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hines T, McGowan P (2005) Supply chain strategies in the UK fashion industry—the rhetoric of partnership and realities of power. Int Entrep Manage J 1: 519–537. doi: 10.1007/s11365-005-4776-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iacovou C, Banbasat I, Dexter A (1995) Electronic data interchange and impact of technology. MIS Q 19(4): 465–485. doi: 10.2307/249629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ihlstrom C, Nisson M (2003) E-business adoption by SMEs-prerequisites and attitudes of SMEs in a Swedish network. J Org Comp Electron Commer 13(3&4): 211–223Google Scholar
  22. Jeon B, Han K, Lee M (2006) Determining factors for the adoption of E-business: the case of SMEs in Korea. Appl Econ 38: 1905–1916. doi: 10.1080/00036840500427262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laudon K, Traver C (2008) E-commerce, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee SM, Lim SB (2007) Factors influencing suppliers’ participation in private electronic markets. Serv Bus 1: 41–62. doi: 10.1007/s11628-006-0005-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levenburg N (2005) Does size matter? Small firms’ use of E-business tools in the supply chain. Electron Mark 15(2): 94–105. doi: 10.1080/10196780500083746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Litz RA, Walker K (2007) Buying into buying groups: is it good for the family firm. Int Entrep Manage J 3: 419–436. doi: 10.1007/s11365-007-0046-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Looi H (2005) E-commerce adoption in Brunei Darussalam: a quantitative analysis of factors influencing its adoption. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 15: 61–81Google Scholar
  28. McKinsey/CAPS Research (2001) E-commerce exchanges: making informed decisions, applying best practices. CAPS Research White Paper, Tempe, AZGoogle Scholar
  29. Metters R, Walton S (2007) Strategic supply chain choices for multi-channel internet retailers. Serv Bus 1: 317–331. doi: 10.1007/s11628-006-0016-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller J, Roth A (1994) Taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Manage Sci 40(3): 285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mukhopadhyay T, Kekre S, Kalathur S (1995) Business value of information technology: a study of electronic data interchange. MIS Q 19(2): 137–156. doi: 10.2307/249685 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Munoz JM, Welsh DHB (2006) Outsourcing in the IT industry: the case of the Philippines. Int Entrep Manage J 2: 111–123. doi: 10.1007/s11365-006-7092-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien J (2005) Introduction to information systems, 12th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Pedhazur E (1997) Multiple regression in behavioral research, 3rd edn. Harcourt Brace, Forth WorthGoogle Scholar
  35. Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K, Nilakanta S (1994) Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective. J Manage Inf Syst 11(2): 157–186Google Scholar
  36. Qureshi S, Briggs R, Hlupic V (2006) Value creation from intellectual capital: convergence of knowledge management and collaboration in the intellectual bandwidth model. Group Decis Negot 15: 197–220. doi: 10.1007/s10726-006-9018-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramamurthy K, Premkumar G, Crum M (1999) Organizational and interorganizational determinants of EDI diffusion and organizational performance: a causal model. J Organ Comput 9(4): 253–285Google Scholar
  38. Rask M, Kragh H (2004) Motives for e-marketplace participation: differences and similarities between buyers and suppliers. Electron Mark 14(4): 270–283. doi: 10.1080/10196780412331311720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ratnasingam P (2000) The Influence of power on trading partner trust in electronic commerce. Internet research. Electron Netw Appl Policy 10(1): 56–62. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Riches P (2003) Set a partner strategy with value networks. KM Rev 6(5): 8–9Google Scholar
  41. Skinner W (1978) Manufacturing in the corporate strategy. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Son J, Benbasat I (2007) Organizational buyers’ adoption and use of B2B electronic marketplaces: efficiency- and legitimacy-oriented perspectives. J Manage Inf Syst 24(1): 55–99. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240102 Google Scholar
  43. Stabell C, Fjeldstad O (1998) Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strateg Manage J 19:413–437. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<413::AID-SMJ946>3.0.CO;2-CGoogle Scholar
  44. Tapscott D, Ticoll D, Lowy A (2000) Digital capital. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  45. Teo H, Wei K, Benbasat I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Q 27(1): 19–49Google Scholar
  46. Vastag G, Narasimhan R (1998) An investigation of causal relationships among manufacturing strategic intent, practices and performances. Proceedings of GMRG Annual meeting.Google Scholar
  47. Weil P, Subramani M, Broadbent M (2002) Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 44(1): 57–65Google Scholar
  48. Weiner M, Nohria N, Hickman A, Smith H (1997) Value networks-the future of the U.S. electric utility industry. Sloan Manage Rev 38(4): 21–33Google Scholar
  49. Wheelen T, Hunger J (1983) Strategic management and business policy. Addison-Wesley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  50. Whitaker J, Stephens J, Traham C (2001) Successfully securing suppliers. Supply Chain Excell 4: 29Google Scholar
  51. Wu F, Lee Y (2005) Determinant of e-communication adoption: the internal push versus external pull factors. Mark Theory 5(1): 7–31. doi: 10.1177/1470593105049599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wymer S, Regan E (2005) Factors influencing e-commerce adoption and use by small and medium business. Electron Mark 15(4): 438–453. doi: 10.1080/10196780500303151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu S, Zhu K, Gibbs J (2004) Global technology, local adoption: a cross-country investigation of Internet adoption by companies in the United States and China. Electron Mark 14(1): 13–24. doi: 10.1080/1019678042000175261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sang M. Lee
    • 1
  • Seong-Bae Lim
    • 2
    Email author
  • Domingo Ribeiro Soriano
    • 3
  1. 1.Management DepartmentUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Bill Greehey School of BusinessSaint Mary’s UniversitySan AntonioUSA
  3. 3.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations