Advertisement

Group Decision and Negotiation

, 18:431 | Cite as

The Decision to Use Alliances as Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Role of Resources and Skills

  • Ángeles Montoro-SánchezEmail author
  • Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado
  • Ana M. Romero-Martínez
Article

Abstract

This aim of this research is to analyse the role of firm resources and skills in the decision to cooperate as a method for developing entrepreneurial activity. We use a sample of 967 entrepreneurial operations undertaken between 2000 and 2004 by 323 EU-15 companies. Results suggest that skills are more important than resources when choosing how to undertake an entrepreneurial activity. While experience in cooperation and possession of technological resources make the choice of an alliance more probable, experience in entrepreneurial activities and possession of physical resources may lead the company to opt for other alternatives.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Strategic decision Alliances Resources and skills Collaborative entrepreneurship 

References

  1. Ahuja G (2000) The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strateg Manage J 21: 317–343 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO;2-BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporations: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough innovations. Strateg Manage J 22: 521–544. doi: 10.1002/smj.176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich H (1990) Using an ecological perspective to study organizational-founding rates. Entrep Theory Pract 14(7): 7–24Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez SA, Barney JB (2005) How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty. J Manage 31(5): 776–793. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alvarez SA, Barney JB (2007) The entrepreneurial theory of the firm. J Manage Stud 44(7): 1057–1063. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00721.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alvarez SA, Busenitz LW (2001) A resource-based theory of entrepreneurship. J Manage 27: 755–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alvarez SA, Ireland RD, Reuer JJ (2006) Entrepreneurship and strategic alliances. J Bus Venturing 21: 401–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armistead C, Pettigrew P (2008) Partnerships in the provision of services by multi-agencies: four dimensions of service leadership and service quality. Serv Bus Int J 2(1): 17–32. doi: 10.1007/s11628-006-0017-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch DB, Castrogiovanni GJ, Ribeiro D, Roig S (2005) Linking entrepreneurship and management: welcome to the International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Int Entrep Manage J 1: 5–7. doi: 10.1007/s11365-005-6672-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17: 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barringer BR, Bluedorn AC (1999) The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strateg Manage J 20(5): 421–444 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199905)20:5 < 421::AID-SMJ30 > 3.0.CO;2-OCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bayona-Sáez C, García-Marco T, Huerta-Arribas E (2001) Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Res Policy 30: 1289–1307. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00151-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bragge J, Merisalo-Rentanen H, Nurmi A et al (2007) A repeatable e-collaboration process based on thinklets for multi-organization strategy development. Group Decis Negot 16(4): 363–380. doi: 10.1007/s10726-006-9055-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee S, Singh J (1999) Are tradeoffs inherent in diversification moves? A simultaneous model for type of diversification and mode of expansion decisions. Manage Sci 45(1): 25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chatterjee S, Wernerfelt B (1991) The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence. Strateg Manage J 12(1): 33–48. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250120104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Covin JG, Miles MP (1999) Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrep Theory Pract 23(3): 47–63Google Scholar
  17. Covin JG, Slevin DP (1988) The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. J Manage Stud 25: 217–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00033.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cuervo A (2005) Individual and enviromental determinants of entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manage J 1: 293–311. doi: 10.1007/s11365-005-2591-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Das TK, Teng B (2000) A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. J Manage 26: 31–61. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00037-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dasi Rodriguez S, Martinez Perez JF, Pardodel Val M (2003) An empirical study about the effect of cultural problematic on organizational learning in alliances. Learn Organ 10(2/3): 138–148. doi: 10.1108/09696470310472462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dess GG, Lumpkin GT, Covin JG (1997) Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: test of contingency and configurational models. Strateg Manage J 18(9): 677–695 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<677::AID-SMJ905>3.0.CO;2-QCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manage Rev 23: 660–679. doi: 10.2307/259056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eckhardt JT, Shane SA (2003) Opportunities and entrepreneurship. J Manage 29(3): 333–349. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00225-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eden C, Ackermann F (2001) Group decision and negotiation in strategy making. Group Decis Negot 10(2): 119–140. doi: 10.1023/A:1008710816126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ Sci 7: 136–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franco CA (2008) Facilitating collaboration with problem structuring methods: a case study of an inter-organisational construction partnership. Group Decis Negot 17: 267–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrigan KR, Newman WH (1990) Bases of interorganization co-operation: propensity, power, persistence. J Manage Stud 27(4): 417–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1990.tb00255.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hashemi RR, Le Blanc LA (2000) Resource allocation through negotiation and compromise: a database approach. Group Decis Negot 9(4): 325–345. doi: 10.1023/A:1008714120334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hasty BK, Massey AP, Brown SA (2006) Role-based experiences, media perceptions, and knowledge transfer success in virtual dyads. Group Decis Negot 15(4): 367–387. doi: 10.1007/s10726-006-9047-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hennart JF, Park YR (1993) Greenfield vs. acquisitions: the strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Manage Sci 29(9): 1054–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill CWL, Kim WC (1988) Searching for a dynamic theory of the multinational enterprise: a transaction cost model. Strateg Manage J 9: 93–194. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250090710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hill CWL, Hwang P, Kim WC (1990) An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strateg Manage J 11(2): 117–128. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250110204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hitt MA, Keats BW, Demarie S (1998) Navigating in the new competitive landscape: building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Acad Manag Exec 12(4): 22–42Google Scholar
  34. Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Webb JW (2006) Entrepreneurial alliances and networks. In: Shenkar J, Reuer JJ (eds) Handbook of strategic alliances. Sage Publishers, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim WC, Hwang P (1992) Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode choice. J Int Bus Stud 23(1): 29–53. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirzner I (1973) Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  37. Knight F (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  38. Kor YY, Mahoney JT, Michael SC (2007) Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. J Manage Stud 44(7): 1187–1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00727.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lang LHP, Stulz RM (1994) Tobin’s q, corporate diversification and firm performance. J Polit Econ 102(6): 1248–1280. doi: 10.1086/261970 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Simplicity as a strategy-making process: the effects of stage of organizational development and environment on performance. Acad Manage J 38(5): 135–172Google Scholar
  41. Mahoney JT, Pandian JR (1992) The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strateg Manage J 13(5): 363–380. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250130505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marino L, Strandholma K, Steensman HK et al (2002) The moderating effect of national culture on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance portfolio extensiveness. Entrep Theory Pract 26: 135–172Google Scholar
  43. McEvily B, Zaheer A (1999) Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strateg Manage J 20(12): 1133–1158 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1133::AID-SMJ74>3.0.CO;2-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miles RE, Miles G, Snow CC (2006) Collaborative entrepreneurship: a business model for continuous innovation. Organ Dynam 35(1): 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller D (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manage Sci 29: 770–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller D, Shamsie J (1996) The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: the Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Acad Manage J 39: 519–543. doi: 10.2307/256654 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Montoro-Sánchez A, Mora-Valentín EM, Guerras-Martín LA (2006) R&D cooperative agreements between Firms and Research Organizations. A comparative analysis of the characteristics and reasons depending on the nature of the partner. Int J Technol Manag 35(1-4): 156–181. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2006.009233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Naman J, Slevin D (1993) Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: a model and empirical tests. Strateg Manage J 14: 137–153. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizations knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1): 14–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nooteboom B (2007) Service value chains and effects of scale. Serv Bus 1: 119–139. doi: 10.1007/s11628-006-0009-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nunamaker JF, Romano NC, Briggs RO (2002) Increasing intellectual bandwidth: generating value from intellectual capital with information technology. Group Decis Negot 11(2): 69–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1015201126568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pardodel Val M, Martinez Fuentes C (2003) Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study. Manage Decis 41(2): 148–157. doi: 10.1108/00251740310457597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Park SH, Ungson GR (1997) The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Acad Manage J 40: 270–307. doi: 10.2307/256884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliances structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad Manage J 36(4): 794–829. doi: 10.2307/256759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Peteraf M (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg Manage J 14: 179–192. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Qureshi S, Briggs RO, Hlupic V (2006) Value creation from intellectual capital: convergence of knowledge management and collaboration in the intellectual brandwidth model. Group Decis Negot 15(3): 197–220. doi: 10.1007/s10726-006-9018-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Robertson TS, Gatignon H (1998) Technology development mode: a transaction cost conceptualization. Strateg Manage J 16(4): 277–299Google Scholar
  59. Romero-Martínez AM, Montoro-Sánchez A (2008) How clusters can encourage entrepreneurship and venture creation. reasons and advantages. Int Entrep Manage J 4(3): 315–329. doi: 10.1007/s11365-008-0079-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploring and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strateg Manage J 25: 201–221. doi: 10.1002/smj.376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roy-Chowdhury P, Roy-Chowdhury I (2000) A learning-based theory of joint ventures life-cycles. Group Decis Negot 9: 457–470. doi: 10.1023/A:1008726920290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rumelt RP (1987) Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship. In: Teece D (eds) The competitive challenge. Ballinger, Cambridge, pp 137–158Google Scholar
  63. Saad I, Rosenthal-Sabroux C, Grundstein M (2005) Improving the decision making process in the design project by capitalizing on company’s crucial knowledge. Group Decis Negot 14(2): 131–145. doi: 10.1007/s10726-005-2405-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manage Rev 25: 217–226. doi: 10.2307/259271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Skaraba A, Kljajic M, Kljajic Borstnar M (2007) The role of information feedback in the management group decision-making process applying system dynamics models. Group Decis Negot 16(1): 77–96. doi: 10.1007/s10726-006-9035-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stevenson HH (1983) A perspective on entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School. Working Paper no. 9-384-131Google Scholar
  67. Stevenson HH, Jarillo JC (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurship management. Strateg Manage J 11: 17–27Google Scholar
  68. Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strateg Manage J 21(4): 791–811 doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<791::AID-SMJ121>3.0.CO;2-KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Teece DJ (1982) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J Econ Behav Organ 3: 39–63. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90003-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Teng BS (2007) Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: a resource-based approach toward competitive advantage. J Manage Stud 44(1): 119–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00645.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tsang EWR (1998) Motives for strategic alliance: a resource-based perspective. Scand J Manage 14(3): 207–221. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00036-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Urbano D, Yordanova D (2008) Determinants of the adoption of HRM practices in tourism SMEs in Spain: an exploratory study. Serv Bus 2: 167–185. doi: 10.1007/s11628-007-0033-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Varadarajan PR, Ramanujam V (1987) Diversification and performance: a reexamination using a new two-dimensional conceptualization of diversity in firms. Acad Manage J 30(2): 380–393. doi: 10.2307/256281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vicente Lorente JD (2001) Specificity and opacity as resource-based determinants of capital structure: evidence for Spanish manufacturing firms. Strateg Manage J 22(2): 157–177 doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<157::AID-SMJ152>3.0.CO;2-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Villalonga B (2004) Intangible resources, Tobin’s q, and sustainability of performance differences. J Econ Behav Organ 54(2): 205–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang L, Zajac EJ (2007) Alliance or acquisitions? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strateg Manage J 28(13): 1291–1317. doi: 10.1002/smj.638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weber EP, Lourich NP, Gaffney MJ (2007) Assessing collaborative capacity in multidimensional world. Admin Soc 39(2): 194–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manage J 5: 171–180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Zacharakis AL (1998) Entrepreneurial entry into foreign markets: a transaction cost perspective. Entrep Theory Pract 21: 23–39Google Scholar
  81. Zahra SA (1993) New product innovation in established companies: associations with industry and strategy variables. Entrep Theory Pract 18(2): 47–69Google Scholar
  82. Zahra SA (1996) Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Acad Manage J 39(6): 1713–1735. doi: 10.2307/257076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zahra SA (2005a) Disciplinary research and entrepreneurship scholarship. In: Alvarez SA, Agarwal R, Sorenson O (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Kluwer, New York, pp 253–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zahra SA (2005b) Theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. J Int Bus Stud 36(1): 20–28. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zahra SA (2007) Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. J Bus Venturing 22: 443–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zahra SA, Jennings DF, Kuratko DF (1999) The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: the state of the field. Entrep Theory Pract 24(2): 45–65Google Scholar
  87. Zahra SA, Neubaum DO, Huse M (2000) Entrepreneurship and medium-size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. J Manage 26(5): 947–976. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado
    • 2
  • Ana M. Romero-Martínez
    • 1
  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y EmpresarialesUniversidad Complutense de MadridPozuelo de Alarcón, MadridSpain
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y SocialesUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations