Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 293–314 | Cite as

Negotiation in Strategy Making Teams: Group Support Systems and the Process of Cognitive Change



This paper reports on the use of a Group Support System (GSS) to explore at a micro level some of the processes manifested when a group is negotiating strategy—processes of social and psychological negotiation. It is based on data from a series of interventions with senior management teams of three operating companies comprising a multi-national organization, and with a joint meeting subsequently involving all of the previous participants. The meetings were concerned with negotiating a new strategy for the global organization. The research involved the analysis of detailed time series data logs that exist as a result of using a GSS that is a reflection of cognitive theory.


Negotiation Group support systems Strategy making 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackermann F, Eden C (2001) Contrasting single user and networked group decision support systems for strategy making. Group Decis Negot 10: 47–66. doi:10.1023/A:1008708912048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackermann F, EdenCwith Brown I (2005) The practice of making strategy. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Agres A, de Vreede GJ, Briggs RO (2005) A tale of two cities-case studies on GSS transition in two organizations. Group Decis Negot 14: 267–284. doi:10.1007/s10726-005-0315-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beer S (1966) Decision and control. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs RO, de Vreede GJ, Nunamaker JF Jr (2003) Collaboration engineering with ThinkLets to pursue sustained success with group support systems. J Manage Inf Syst 19: 31–63Google Scholar
  6. Bryson JM (2004) Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. 3. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryson J, Ackermann F, Eden C, Finn C (2004) Visible thinking: unlocking causal mapping for practical business results. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  8. Burt G (2000) Managerial recipes as transitional objects. PhD Thesis, University of StrathclydeGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole RR (1958) Increasing utilisation of the cost-quantity relationship in manufacturing. J Ind Eng 9 (May–June):173–177Google Scholar
  10. de Vreede GJ, de Bruijn H (1999) Exploring the boundaries of successful GSS application: supporting inter-organizational policy networks. Database 30: 111–113. doi: 10.1145/344241.344248 Google Scholar
  11. de Vreede GJ, Davison R, Briggs RO (2003) How a silver bullet may lose its shine—learning from failure with group support systems. Commun ACM 46: 96–101. doi:10.1145/859670.859676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dennis A, Gallupe RB (1993) A history of group support systems empirical research: lessons learnt and future directions. In: Jessup L, Valacich J (eds) Group support systems—new perspectives. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennis A, George J, Jessup L, Nunamaker J, Vogel D (1988) Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Q 12: 591–624. doi:10.2307/249135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eden C (1992) On the nature of cognitive maps. J Manage Stud 29: 261–265. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00690.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eden C, Ackermann F (1998) Making strategy: the journey of strategic management. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Eden C, Ackermann F (2001) A mapping framework for strategy making. In: Huff A, Jenkins M (eds) Mapping strategy. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Eden C, Huxham C (1996) Action research for the study of organizations. In: Clegg S, Hardy C, Nord W (eds) Handbook of organization studies. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  18. Eden C, Huxham C (2001) The negotiation of purpose in multi-organizational collaborative groups. J Manage Stud 38: 351–369. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eden C, Huxham C (2006) Researching organizations using action research. In: Nord W (eds) Handbook of organization studies. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  20. Eden C, Jones S, Sims D (1983) Messing about in problems. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Evered R, Louis MR (1981) Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: inquiry from the inside and inquiry from the outside. Acad Manage Rev 6: 385–386. doi:10.2307/257374 Google Scholar
  22. Fisher R, Ury W (1982) Getting to yes. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Fransella F, Bannister D (1977) A manual for repertory grid technique. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodwin P, Wright G (1998) Decision analysis for management judgment. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  25. Helmer O (1983) Looking forward: a guide to futures research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodgkinson G, Johnson G (1995) Exploring the mental models of competitive strategists: the case for a processual approach. J Manage Stud 31: 525–551. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00629.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janis IL (1972) Victims of group think. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  28. Jessup LM, Tansik DA (1991) Decision making in an automated environment: the effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support system. Decis Sci 22: 266–279. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00346.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jessup L, Valacich J (1993) Group support systems: new perspectives. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson P (2009) Swapping collective cognition for collectivity in the strategic management literature. International studies in management and organization (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  31. Johnson P, Daniels K, Asch R (1998) Mental models of competition. In: Eden C, Spender JC (eds) Managerial and organizational cognition. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelly GA (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelly G (1991) The psychology of personal constructs volume 1: a theory of personality. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (1991) Implementing global strategies: the role of procedural justice. Strateg Manage J 12: 125–143. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (1995) A procedural justice model of strategic decision making. Organ Sci 6: 44–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (1998) Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strateg Manage J 19(4): 323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (2001) How to earn commitment. Financial Times, October 22, p 8Google Scholar
  38. Klimoski R, Mohammed S (1994) Team mental model: construct or metaphor. J Manage 20: 403–437. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90021-3 Google Scholar
  39. Mingers J, Rosenhead J (2004) Problem structuring methods in action. Eur J Oper Res 152: 530–554. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00056-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Norburn D (1989) The chief executive: a breed apart. Strateg Manage J 10: 1–15. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Normann R (1985) Developing capabilities for organizational learning. In: Pennings JM (ed) Organizational strategy and change, Jossey-Bass, San Fransico, CAGoogle Scholar
  42. Pettigrew AM (1992) On studying managerial elites. Strateg Manage J 13: 163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Porac J, Thomas H, Baden Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of the scottish knitwear manufacturers. J Manage Stud 26(4): 397–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rapoport RN (1970) Three dilemmas of action research. Hum Relat 23: 499–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaw D (2003) Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the brainstormed ideas. J Oper Res Soc 54: 692–705. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheetz SD, Tegarden DP, Zigurs I, Kozar KA (1994) A group support systems approach to cognitive mapping. J Manage Inf Syst 11: 31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simons T, Pelled LH, Smith KA (1999) Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad Manage J 42: 662–673. doi:10.2307/256987 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Susman G, Evered R (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm Sci Q 23: 582–603. doi:10.2307/2392581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tegarden DP, Sheetz SD (2003) Group cognitive mapping: a methodology and system for capturing and evaluating managerial and organizational cognition. Omega 31: 113–125. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00018-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Valacich J, Vogel D, Nunamaker J (1992) Group size and anonymity effects on computer mediated idea generation. Small Group Res 23: 49–73. doi:10.1177/1046496492231004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van den Herik CW, de Vreede GJ (2000) Experiences with facilitating policy meetings with group support systems. Int J Technol Manage 19: 246–268. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2000.002819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ Sci 6: 280–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm Sci Q 38: 357–381. doi:10.2307/2393372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Winnicott DW (1953) Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: a study of the first not-me possession. Int J Psychoanal XXXIV(Part2):89–97Google Scholar
  55. Wright RP (2006) Rigor and relevance using repertory grid technique in strategy research. Res Methodol Strategy Manage 3: 295–348Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Strathclyde Business SchoolGlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations