Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Progressive Search for a Group Ranking with Robust Conclusions on Prudent Orders

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem where rankings, provided for instance by a group of evaluators, have to be combined into a common group ranking. In such a context, Arrow and Raynaud suggested that the compromise ranking should be a prudent order. In general, a prudent order is not unique. That is why, we propose to manage this possible multiplicity of compromise solutions by computing robust conclusions. This allows for a progressive refinement of the decision model and supports the group to eventually select one group ranking. The approach is illustrated on a problem where a group of junior researchers has to agree on a ranking of research domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow K, Rayanud H (1986) Social choice and multicriterion decision-making, MIT Press

  • Bernardo JJ (1977) An assignment approach to choosing R&D experiments. Decision Sci 8: 489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blin JM (1976) A linear assignement formulation for the multiattribute decision problem. Revue Française d’automatique, d’informatique et de recherche opérationelle 6: 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Borda JC (1784) Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Histoire de l’académie royale des sciences

  • Bruggemann R, Halfon E, Welzl G, Voigt K, Steinberg CEW (2001) Applying the concept of partially ordered sets on ranking of near shore sediments by a battery of tests. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 4: 918–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Colson G (2000) The OR’s prize winner and the software ARGOS: how a multijudge and multicriteria ranking GDSS helps a jury to attribute a scientific award. Comput Oper Res 27: 741–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook W, Seiford L (1978) Priority ranking and consensus formation. Manage Sci 24: 1721–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debord B (1987b) Axiomatisation de procédures d’agrégation de préférences. PhD Thesis, Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble

  • De Keyser W, Springael J (2002) Another way of looking at group decision making opens new perspectives. Technical Report 2002015, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics

  • Dias L, Clímaco J (2000) ELECTRE TRI for groups with imprecise information on parameter values. Group Decis Neg 9: 355–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias L, Clímaco J (2005) Dealing with imprecise information in group multicriteria decisions: a methodology and a GDSS architecture. Eur J Oper Res 160: 291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias L, Tsoukiàs A (2004) On the constructive and other approaches in decision aiding. In: Antunes CH, Figueira J, Clímaco J. (eds.), Aide multicritére à décision: multiple criteria decision aiding, pp. 13–28, CCDRC/INESCC/FEUC.

  • Dushnik B, Miller E (1941) Partially ordered sets. Am J Math 63: 600–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guénoche A (1996) Vainqueurs de Kemeny et tournois difficiles. Mathématique, Informatique et Sciences humaines 133: 57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelassi T, Kersten G, Ziont S (1990) An introduction to group decision and negotiation support. In: Bana e Costa CA (ed), Readings in multiple criteria decision making, Springer Verlag, pp. 537–568

  • Kemeny J (1959) Mathematics without numbers. Daedulus 88: 571–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler G (1978) Choix multicritère et analyse algébrique de données ordinales. PhD Thesis, Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble

  • Lamboray C (2006) An axiomatic characterization of the prudent order preference function. Annales du Lamsade 6: 229–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamboray C (2007) Prudent ranking rules: theoretical contributions and applications. PhD thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Université du Luxembourg

  • Lansdowne Z (1996) Ordinal ranking methods for multicriterion decision making. Nav Res Logistics 43: 613–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansdowne Z (1997) Outranking methods for multicriterion decision-making: Arrow’s and Raynaud’s conjecture. Soc Choice Welfare 14: 125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1998) A missing link in operational research decision aiding: robustness analysis. Found Comput Decis Sci 23: 141–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B, Bouyssou D (1993) Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Economica

  • Slater P (1961) Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired comparisons. Biometrica 48: 303–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Tideman TN (1987) Independence of clones as criterion for voting rules. Soc Choice Welfare 4: 185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer and Decision Engineering, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), C.P. 210/01 Boulevard du triomphe, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Claude Lamboray

Authors
  1. Claude Lamboray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Lamboray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamboray, C. A Progressive Search for a Group Ranking with Robust Conclusions on Prudent Orders. Group Decis Negot 19, 39–56 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9102-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9102-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation