Abstract
This paper reviews research on the role of anger in conflict. We distinguish between intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of anger, the former referring to the impact of parties’ feelings of anger on their own behavior and the latter referring to the impact of one parties’ anger on the other’s behavior. We further compare the effects of anger across a variety of conflict settings, including negotiation, ultimatum bargaining, prisoner’s dilemma, resource dilemma, and coalition formation. At the intrapersonal level, anger is associated with competition in all conflict settings. In contrast, the interpersonal effects of anger differ across situations, with anger sometimes eliciting cooperation, sometimes eliciting competition, and sometimes having no effect. Based on the research reviewed, we conclude that the interpersonal effects of anger in conflict are determined by the level of interdependence of the parties, their information processing tendencies, and the justifiability of the anger expressions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allred KG (1999). Anger and retaliation: toward an understanding of impassioned conflict in organizations. Res Negotiat Organ 7: 27–58
Allred KG, Mallozzi JS, Matsui F and Raia CP (1997). The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 70: 175–187
Averill JR (1982). Anger and aggression. Springer, New York
Baron RA (1990). Environmentally induced positive affect: It’s impact on self-efficacy, task performance, negotiation and conflict. J Appl Soc Psychol 20: 368–384
Baron RA, Fortin SP, Frei RL, Hauver LA and Shack ML (1990). Reducing organizational conflict: the role of socially-induced positive affect. Int J Conflict Manage 1: 133–152
Barry B, Fulmer IS, Van Kleef GA (2004) I laughed, I cried, I settled: the role of emotion in negotiation. In: Gelfand MJ, Brett JM (eds) The handbook of negotiation and culture. Stanford University Press, pp 71–94
Bazerman MH, Curhan JR, Moore DA and Valley KL (2000). Negotiation. Annu Rev Psychol 51: 279–314
Bok S (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. Pantheon Books, New York
Boles TL, Croson RTA and Munighan JK (2000). Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 83: 235–259
Bolton GE, Chatterjee K and McGinn KL (2003). How communication links influence coalition bargaining: a laboratory investigation. Manage Sci 49: 583–598
Butt AN, Choi JN and Jaeger AM (2005). The effects of self-emotion, counterpart emotion, and counterpart behavior on negotiator behavior: a comparison of individual-level and dyad-level dynamics. J Organ Behav 26: 681–704
Camerer C and Thaler RH (1995). Anomalies: ultimatums, dictators and manners. J Econ Perspect 9: 209–219
Carnevale PJ and Isen AM (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organ Behav Human Decis Proces 37: 1–13
Chertkoff JM (1971). Coalition formation as a function of differences in resources. J Conflict Resolut 15: 371–383
Daly JP (1991). The effects of anger on negotiations over mergers and acquisitions. Negotiat J 7: 31–39
Darwin C (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals, 3rd edn. HarperCollins, London
Dawes RM (1980). Social dilemmas. Ann Rev Psychol 31: 169–193
De Dreu CKW and Van Kleef GA (2004). The influence of power on the information search, impression formation and demands in negotiation. J Exp Soc Psychol 40: 303–319
Druckman D, Rozelle M and Zechmeister K (1977). Conflict of interest and value dissensus: two perspectives. In: Druckman, D (eds) Negotiations: social-psychological perspectives, pp. Sage, Beverly Hills CA
Ekman P (1993). Facial expression and emotion. Am Psychol 48: 384–392
Fisher R and Ury W (1981). Getting to yes. Penguin Books, New York
Fiske ST and Dépret E (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. In: Stroebe, W and Hewstone, M (eds) European review of social psychology vol 7, pp 31–61. Wiley, Chichester England
Forgas JP (1998). On feeling good and getting your way: mood effects on negotiator cognition and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 74: 565–577
Fridlund AJ (1992). The behavioral ecology and sociality of human faces. In: Clark, MS (eds) Review of personality and social psychology, vol 13, pp 90–121. Sage, Thousand Oakes, CA
Friedman R, Anderson C, Brett J, Olekalns M, Goates N and Lisco CC (2004). The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: evidence from electronically mediated disputes. J Appl Psychol 89: 369–376
Frijda NH (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Frijda NH and Mesquita B (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In: Kitayama, S and Markus, HS (eds) Emotion and culture: empirical studies of mutual influence, pp 51–87. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Güth W and Tietz R (1990). Ultimatum bargaining behavior: a survey and comparison of experimental results. J Econ Psychol 11: 417–449
Güth W, Schmittberger R and Schwarze B (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Org 3: 367–388
Handgraaf MJJ, Van Dijk E and De Cremer D (2003). Social utility in ultimatum bargaining. Soc Justice Res 16: 263–283
Harinck F (2004). Persuasive arguments and beating around the bush in negotiations. Group Process Intergroup Relat 7: 5–17
Harinck F and De Dreu CKW (2004). Negotiating interests or values and reaching integrative agreements: the importance of time pressure and temporary impasses. Eur J Soc Psycho 34: 595–611
Harinck F, De Dreu CKW and VanVianen AE M (2000). The impact of conflict issue on fixed-pie perceptions, problem solving, and integrative outcomes in negotiation. Organ Behav Human Decis Proces 81: 329–358
Kahan JP and Rapoport A (1984). Theories of coalition formation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ
Kassinove H, Roth D, Owens SG and Fuller JR (2002). Effects of trait anger and anger expression style on competitive attack responses in a wartime prisoner’s dilemma game. Aggress Behav 28: 117–125
Keltner D and Haidt J (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognit Emotion 13: 505–521
Keltner D and Robinson RJ (1997). Defending the status quo: power and bias in social conflict. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 23: 1066–1077
Klinnert M, Campos J, Sorce J, Emde R and Svejda M (1983). Emotions as behavior regulators: social referencing in infants. In: Plutchik, R and Kellerman, H (eds) Emotion theory, research, and experience, vol 2, pp 57–68. Academic Press, New York
Knapp A and Clark M (1991). Some detrimental effects of negative mood on individuals’ ability to solve resource dilemmas. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 17: 678–688
Knutson B (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. J Nonverbal Behav 20: 165–182
Kopelman S, Rosette AS and Thompson L (2006). The three faces of eve: an examination of the strategic display of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Org Behav Human Decis Process 99: 81–101
Kramer RM (1991). Intergroup Relations and Organizational Dilemmas – the Role of categorization Processes. Res Organ Behav 13: 191–228
Kruglanski AW and Webster DM (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychol Rev 103: 263–283
Lerner JS and Keltner D (2001). Fear, anger and risk. J Pers Soc Psychol 81: 146–159
Mayer JD, Salovey P, Gomberg-Kaufman S and Blainey K (1991). A broader conception of mood experience. J Pers Soc Psychol 60: 100–111
Messick DM and Brewer MB (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In: Wheeler, L and Shaver, P (eds) Review of personality and social psychology, vol 4, pp 11–44. Sage, Beverley Hills, CA
Morris MW and Keltner D (2000). How emotions work: an analysis of the social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Res Organ Behav 22: 1–50
Murnighan JK (1978). Models of coalition behavior: game theoretic, social psychological and political perspectives. Psychol Bull 85: 1130–1153
Murnighan JK (1991) The dynamics of bargaining games. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Oatley K and Jenkins JM (1992). Human emotions: function and dysfunction. Annu Rev of Psychol 43: 55–85
O’Connor KM and Carnevale PJ (1997). A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 23: 504–515
Parkinson B (1996). Emotions are social. Brit J Psychol 87: 663–683
Pillutla MM and Murnighan JK (1996). Unfairness, anger and spite: emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 68: 208–224
Pinkley RL (1995). Impact of knowledge regarding alternatives to settlement in dyadic negotiations: whose knowledge counts?. J Appl Psychol 80: 403–417
Pruitt DG and Carnevale PJ (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Open University Press, Buckingham, England
Rokeach M (1973). The nature of human values. Free Press, New York
Sinaceur M and Tiedens LZ (2006). Get mad and get more than even: when and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. J Exp Soc Psychol 42: 314–322
Skitka LJ (2002). Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28: 588–697
Steinel W and De Dreu CKW (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol 86: 419–434
Steinel W, Van Kleef GA, Harinck F (in press) Are you talking to me?! Separating the people from the problem when expressing emotions in negotiation. J Exp Soc Psychol
Suleiman R (1996). Expectations and fairness in a modified ultimatum game. J Econ Psychol 17: 531–554
Thaler RH (1988). Anomalies: the ultimatum game. J Econ Perspect 2: 195–206
Tetlock PE, Kristel OV, Elson SB, Green MC and Lerner JS (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base-rates, and heretical counterfactuals. J Pers Soc Psychol 78: 853–870
Thompson L and Gonzalez R (1996). Environmental disputes; competition for scarce resource and clashing of values. In: Bazerman, MH, Messick, DM, Tenbrunsel, AE and Wade-Benzoni, KA (eds) Environment, ethics, and behavior, pp 75–104. New Lexington Press, San Francisco
Van Beest I, Van Dijk E, De Dreu CKW and Wilke HAM (2005). Do-no-harm in coalition formation: why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions. J Exp Soc Psychol 41(6): 609–617
Van Beest I, Van Dijk E and Wilke HAM (2004a). The interplay of self-interest and equity in coalition formation. Eur J Soc Psychol 34: 547–565
Van Beest I, Van Dijk E and Wilke HAM (2004b). Resources and alternatives in coalition formation: the effects on payoff, self-serving behavior, and bargaining length. European J Soc Psychol 34: 713–728
Van Beest I, Van Kleef GA, Van Dijk E (2006) When raisings one’s voice lowers one’s payoff: the effects of anger in multi-party negotiation. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Seville, Spain
Van Dijk E and Tenbrunsel A (2005). The battle between self-interest and fairness in bargaining: ultimatum, dictator and delta games. In: Gilliland, SW, Steiner, DD, Skarlicki, DP, and Vanden Bos, K (eds) What motivates fairness in organizations? [In Gilliland SW, Steiner DD, Skarlicki DP (Series Eds), Res social issues in management], pp 31–48. Greenwich CT, Information Age Publishing, pp
Van Dijk E, Van Kleef GA, Steinel W, Van Beest I (2006) Emotions in bargaining: when communicating anger pays and when it backfires. Manuscript submitted for publication
Van Kleef GA, Côté S (in press) Expressing anger in conflict: when it helps and when it hurts. J Appl Psychol
Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW and Manstead ASR (2004a). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. J Pers Soc Psychol 86: 57–76
Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW and Manstead ASR (2004b). The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 87: 510–528
Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Pietroni D and Manstead ASR (2006). Power and emotion in negotiations: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. Eur J Soc Psychol 36: 557–581
Vinacke WE and Arkoff A (1957). An experimental study of coalitions in the triad. Ame Soc Rev 22: 406–414
Wade-Benzoni KA, Hoffman AJ, Thompson LL, Moore DA, Gillespie JJ and Bazerman MH (2002). Barriers to resolution in ideologically based negotiations: the role of values and institutions. Acad Manage Rev 27: 41–57
Webster DM and Kruglanski AW (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J Person Soc Psychol 67: 1049–1062
Wilke HAM (1985). Coalition formation. Elsevier, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this paper was facilitated by a Veni grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO 451–05–010) awarded to Gerben A. Van Kleef.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Van Kleef, G.A., van Dijk, E., Steinel, W. et al. Anger in social conflict: Cross-situational comparisons and suggestions for the future. Group Decis Negot 17, 13–30 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9092-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9092-8