Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Emotions in negotiation

Article

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the ways in which emotions influence the course of negotiation. Emotions play a role in the development of relationships among negotiators; they also facilitate or hinder coordination of strategic exchanges. These functions highlight an interplay between information-processing and emotional expressions: intentions are inferred from statements made and nonverbal gestures sent. They are understood as part of an expression game that emphasizes interaction dynamics. They are also understood in terms of the organizational contexts surrounding negotiation. These are some of the themes that surface in the articles contributed to this special issue. An overview of the articles calls attention to key points but also expands on the themes suggested by the authors. The work reported in this issue provides a basis for a continuing research agenda on emotions in negotiation.

Keywords

Emotions Experimentation Expression games Information-processing Intentions Negotiation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Rererences

  1. Adams JS (1976) The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. In: Dunnette MD (ed) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Rand McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson C and Galinsky A (2006). Power, optimism and risk-taking. Eur J Soc Psychol 36: 511–536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson C and Thompson L (2004). Affect from the top down: how powerful individuals’ positive affect shapes negotiations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 95: 125–139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyle M, Lalljee M and Cook M (1968). The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad. Human Relat 21: 3–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron RA (1990). Environmentally-induced positive affect: its impact on self-efficacy, task performance, negotiation and conflict. J Appl Soc Psychol 20: 368–384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barry B and Oliver RL (1996). Affect in dyadic negotiation: A model and propositions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 67: 127–163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartunek JM, Benton A and Keys CB (1975). Third party intervention and the bargaining behavior of group representatives. J Conflict Resolut 19: 532–557 Google Scholar
  8. Brett J, Olekalns M, Friedman R, Goates N, Anderson C and Lisco C (2007). Sticks and stones: language and on-line dispute resolution. Acad Manage J 50: 85–99 Google Scholar
  9. Burke W, Biggert N (1997) Inter-organizational cooperation. In: Druckman D, Singer J, Van Cott H (eds) Enhancing organizational performance. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Carnevale P and Isen AM (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organ Behav Hum Perform 37: 1–13 Google Scholar
  11. Clore GL, Gasper K, Gavin E (2001) Affect as information. In: Forgas JP (ed) Handbook of affect and social cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly JP (1991). The effects of anger on negotiations over mergers and acquisitions. Negot J 7: 31–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darwin C (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Murray, London Google Scholar
  14. De Dreu CKW, Weingart L and Kwon S (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. J Pers Soc Psychol 78: 889–905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DePaulo BM, Zuckerman M, Rosenthal R (1980) Detecting deception: modality effects. In: Wheeler L (ed) Review of personality and social psychology, vol 1. Sage, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. Deutsch M (1985). Distributive justice: a social-psychological perspective. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT Google Scholar
  17. Druckman D (1994). Determinants of compromising behavior in negotiation: a meta-analysis. J Conflict Resolut 38: 507–556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Druckman D (1998). Social exchange theory: promises and prospects. Int Negot 3: 253–266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Druckman D, Rozelle R and Baxter J (1982). Nonverbal communication: survey, theory, and research. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA Google Scholar
  20. Druckman D, Karis D, Donchin E (1986) Information-processing in bargaining: reactions to an opponent’s shift in concession strategy. In: Tietz R (ed) Aspiration levels in bargaining and economic decision making. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunn JR and Schweitzer ME (2005). Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. J Pers Soc Psychol 88: 736–748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ekman P (1972) Universal and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In: Cole JK (ed) Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NebraskaGoogle Scholar
  23. Ekman P and Friesen WV (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face. J Pers Soc Psychol 29: 288–298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ekman P and Friesen WV (1975). Unmasking the face: a guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Google Scholar
  25. Forgas JP (1998). On feeling good and getting your way: mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. J Pers Soc Psychol 74: 565–577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (1993). Emotion in organizations. Sage, London Google Scholar
  27. Friedman R, Brett J, Anderson C, Olekalns M, Goates N and Lisco C (2004). Emotions and rationality in mediation: evidence from electronically-mediated disputes. J Appl Psychol 89: 369–376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goffman E (1969). Strategic interaction. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia Google Scholar
  29. Hegtvedt KA and Killian C (1999). Fairness and emotions: reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Soc Forces 78: 269–303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hopmann PT (1995). Two paradigms of negotiation: bargaining and problem solving. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 542: 24–47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Irmer C (2003) The promise of process: evidence on ending violent international conflict. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VAGoogle Scholar
  32. Jehn KA (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: an investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intergroup conflict. Int J Confl Manage 5: 223–238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson DW (1971). The effects of warmth of interaction, accuracy of understanding and the proposal of compromises on the listener’s behavior. J Couns Psychol 18: 207–216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keltner D, Haidt J, Shiota MN (2006) Social functionalism and the evolution of emotions. In: Schaller M, Simpson JA, Kenrick DT (eds) Evolution and social psychology: frontiers of social psychology. Psychosocial Press, Madison, CTGoogle Scholar
  35. Knapp ML and Miller GR (1985). Handbook of interpersonal communication. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA Google Scholar
  36. Kopelman D, Rosette A and Thompson L (2006). The three faces of Eve: Strategic displays of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 99: 81–101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kray L and Thompson L (2005). Gender and negotiation. Res Organ Behav 26: 102–182 Google Scholar
  38. Kressel K, Frontera E, Forlenza S, Butler F and Fish L (1994). The settlement orientation vs. the problem-solving style in custody mediation. J Soc Issues 50: 67–84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewicki R, Stevenson M (1997) Trust development in negotiation: proposed actions and a research agenda. Paper presented at the conference on Trust and Business: Barriers and Bridges, DePaul University, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  40. McIntosh DN (1996). Facial feedback hypotheses: evidence, implications and directions. Motivation and Emotion 20: 121–147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morris MW and Keltner D (2000). How emotions work: the social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Res Organ Behav 22: 1–50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Connor K and Carnevale P (1997). A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 23: 504–519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olekalns M and Smith P (2005). Moments in time: metacognition, trust and outcomes in negotiation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 31: 1696–1707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olekalns M, Smith P (2007) Willing and able? Trust, affect and power balance as predictors of deception in negotiation. Melbourne Business School Working Paper 2007–08Google Scholar
  45. Olekalns M, Roberts C, Probst T, Smith P and Carnevale P (2005). The impact of message frame on negotiators’ social judgments. Int J Confl Manage 16: 379–402 Google Scholar
  46. Plant EA, Hyde JS, Keltner D and Devine PG (2000). The gender stereotyping of emotions. Psychol Women Quart 24: 81–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pruitt DG (1995). Flexibility in conflict episodes. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 542: 100–115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rudman L and Glick P (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward a gentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. J Pers Soc Psychol 77: 1004–1010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shiota MN, Keltner D, Hertenstein MJ (2004) Positive emotion and the regulation of interpersonal relationships. In: Philippot P, Feldman RS (eds) The regulation of emotion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJGoogle Scholar
  50. Steinel W and De Dreu CKW (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol 86: 419–434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thompson L (1990). An examination of naïve and eperienced negotiators. J Person Soc Psychol 59: 82–90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tiedens LZ and Linton S (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. J Pers Soc Psychol 81: 973–988 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW and Manstead AS (2004). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. J Pers Soc Psychol 86: 57–76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Pietroni D and Manstead AS (2006). Power and emotion in negotiation: power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. Eur J Soc Psychol 36: 557–581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wall JA (1975). Effects of constituent trust and representative bargaining orientation in intergroup bargaining. J Pers Soc Psychol 31: 1004–1112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walton RE and McKersie RB (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: an analysis of a social interaction system. McGraw-Hill, New York Google Scholar
  57. Woodworth RS (1938). Experimental psychology. Henry Holt, New York Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Melbourne Business SchoolUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations