Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive Mapping: A Process to Support Strategic Planning in an Academic Department

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive mapping has been used to support strategic planning in business. However, the process has seldom been utilized to support strategic planning in nonprofit public organizations, where many reporting lines are less clear. This paper describes how the cognitive mapping process was designed and implemented to help a large academic department identify and merge the individual goals of faculty members as a first step in creating a strategic plan. Each map was created using the Decision ExplorerTM software during individual interviews, as opposed to using paper and pencil. An action case approach was used to plan and evaluate individual mapping sessions. Eliciting individual cognitive maps led to greater engagement by faculty in the strategic planning process. Nearly all of the participating faculty members believed that the cognitive mapping process was helpful and insightful and the resulting map was accurate and complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann, F. and C. Eden. (2004). “Using Causal Mapping: Individual and Group, Traditional and New,” in: Pidd, M. (ed.), Systems Modeling: Theory and Practice. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann, F., C. Eden, and I. Brown. (2005). The Practice of Making Strategy: A Step-by-Step Guide. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann, F., C. Eden, and T. Williams. (1997). “Modeling for Litigation: Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches,” Interfaces 27, 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., G. M. Marakas, and Y. Yoo. (2002). “A Comparative Study of Distributed Learning Environments,” Information Systems Research 13(4), 404–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bougon, M. G. (1992). “Congregate Cognitive Maps: A Unified Dynamic Theory of Organization and Strategy,” Journal of Management Studies 29(3), 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braa, K. and R. Vidgen. (1999). “Interpretation, Intervention, and Reduction in the organizational Laboratory: a Framework for In-Context Information System Research,” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 9, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. M. (1992). “Cognitive Mapping and Repertory Grids for Qualitative Survey Research: Some Comparative Observations,” Journal of Management Studies 29(3), 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M. (1995). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J., F. Ackermann, C. Eden, and C. Finn. (1995). “Using the “Oval Mapping Process” to identify Strategic Issues and Formulate Effective Strategies,” in: Bryson, J. M. (ed.), Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J., F. Ackermann, C. Eden, and C. Finn. (2004). Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping for Practical Business Results. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1991). “From Framework Through Experience to Learning: The Essential nature of Action Research,” in: Nissen H.-E., Klein H. K., and Hirschheim R. (eds.), Information systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decision ExplorerTM Reference Manual, Version 3.1. (2000). Glasgow: Banxia Software Limited.

  • Decision Explorer TM User's Guide, Version 3. (1997). Glasgow: Banxia Software Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., C. K. Tyran, D. R. Vogel, and J. F. Jr. Nunamaker. (1997). “Group support systems for strategic planning,” Journal of Management Information Systems 14(1), 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (2004). “Analyzing Cognitive Maps to Help Structure Issues or Problems,” European Journal of Operational Research 159(3), 673–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and F. Ackermann. (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and F. Ackermann. (2001). “Contrasting Single User and Networked Group Decision Support Systems for Strategy Making,” Group Decision and Negotiation 10(1), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and F. Ackermann. (2001). “Group Decision and Negotiation in Strategy Making,” Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glew, D. J., A. M. O'Leary-Kelly, and D. D. Van Fleet. (1995). “Participation in Organizations: A preview of the Issues and Proposed Framework for Future Analysis,” Journal of Management 21(3), 395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., A. J. Maule, and N. J. Bown. (2004). “Causal Cognitive Mapping in the Organizational Strategy Field: A Comparison of Alternative Elicitation Procedures,” Organizational Research Methods 7(1),3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, A. S. (ed.) (1990). Mapping Strategic Thought. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C. and R. Mauborgne. (1998). “Procedural Justice, Strategic Decision Making, and the Knowledge Economy,” Strategic Management Journal 19(4), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, M. (1998). “Conducting Causal Mapping Research: Opportunities and Challenges,” in: Eden C. and Spender J.-C. S. (eds.) Managerial and Organizational Cognition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, A. and C. Y. Carver. (2000). “Using Web Groupware and Cognitive Mapping in a CIS Department to Review and Revise the Assessment Process and Document Reasoning,” in: Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1–10.

  • Morton, A., F. Ackermann, and V. Belton. (2003). “Technology-Driven and Model-Driven Approaches to Group Decision Support: Focus, Research Philosophy, and Key Concepts,” European Journal of Information Systems 12, 110–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosvick, R. and R. Nelson. (1987). We've Got to Start Meeting Like This: A Guide to Successful Business Meeting Management. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, V. K. and D. J. Armstrong. (2005). Causal Mapping for Research in Information Technology. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. M., S. Nadkarni, V. K. Narayanan, and M. Ghods. (2000). “Understanding Software Operations Support Expertise: A Revealed Causal Mapping Approach,” MIS Quarterly 23(3), 475–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, D. J. (1988). “Anticipating Organization Structures”, in J. Hage ed., Futures of Organizations: Innovating to Adapt Strategy and Human Resources to Rapid Technological Change. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheetz, S. D., G. Irwin, D. P. Tegarden, H. J. Nelson, and D. E. Monarchi. (1997). “Exploring the Difficulties of Learning Object-Oriented Techniques,” Journal of Management Information Systems 14(2), 103–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheetz, S. D., D. P. Tegarden, K. A. Kozar, and I. Zigurs. (1994). “A Group Support Systems Approach to Cognitive Mapping,” Journal of Management Information Systems 11(1), 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susman, G. (1983). “Action Research: A Sociotechnical System Perspective,” in G. Morgan ed., Beyond method: Strategies for Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. A. (2000). The Relationship Between Organizational Learning Cultures and Participation in Decision Making, Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State University.

  • Warren, K. (1995). “Exploring Competitive Futures Using Cognitive Mapping,” Long Range Planning 28(5), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy D. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, R.D., Lipp, A. Cognitive Mapping: A Process to Support Strategic Planning in an Academic Department. Group Decis Negot 16, 43–60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9031-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9031-0

Keywords

Navigation