Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding genetic diversity in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] collections of Indian National Genebank

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] is a protein rich pulse crop of Indian origin. The crop is cultivated in diverse range of agro-ecological regions, cropping systems and cultural environments, since ancient times. This has resulted in build-up of substantial amount of genetic diversity, directly or indirectly associated with survival and useful economic traits. However, the diversity remains underutilized in the crop improvement. This has adversely impacted the crop improvement programs. Therefore, in this study, we have characterized 840 accessions of blackgram for important agro-morphological traits to highlight the useful diversity available in the crop genepool. Statistical analyses have revealed a substantial amount of genetic diversity available in blackgram. Phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variation showed a wide range of variation for pod length, seeds per pod, seed weight, flowering and maturity related traits. Comparatively high level of genetic gain was observed for days to initial flowering (57.12), flowering period (40.35), days to 50% flowering (37.26), days to end of flowering (31.23), canopy height (31.06) and days to 80% maturity (29.6). The first seven principal components (PCs) explained 92.197% of the total variability in the blackgram germplasm. Plotting of the first two major PCs in 2-dimnentional space highlighted the relationship among traits, and certain associations between traits and observations. Promising accessions with desirable magnitude of trait variation were also identified. The implications of results obtained from this study in blackgram breeding programs may prove useful in enhancing yield and genetic variability in the crop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arulbalachandran D, Mullainathan L, Velu S, Thilagavathi C (2010) Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance of quantitative traits in blackgram by effects of mutation in field trail. Afr J Biotechnol 9(19):2731–2735

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisht IS, Mahajan RK, Patel DP (1998) The use of characterization data to establish the Indian mungbean core collection and assessment of genetic diversity. Genet Resour Crop Evol 45(2):127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brar JS, Bains TS, Shanmugasundaram S, Singh S (2002) Developing short duration mungbean genotypes suitable for rice-wheat cropping system. Final Workshop and Planning Meeting on Mungbean, 61.

  • Burton GW (1952) Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Pro VI Int Grassl Cong, Pennsylvania State College, pp 277–283.

  • Chandel KPS, Lester RN, Starling RJ (1984) The wild ancestors of urid and mung beans (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Bot J Linn Soc 89(1):85–96.

  • Duraimurugan P, Pratap A, Singh SK, Gupta S (2014) Evaluation of screening methods for bruchid beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis) resistance in greengram (Vigna radiata) and blackgram (Vigna mungo) genotypes and influence of seed physical characteristics on its infestation. Vegetos 27(1):60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA (1978) Leaf hairs: effects on physiological activity and adaptive value to a desert shrub. Oecologia 37(2):183–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gayacharan TK, Meena SK, Panwar BS, Lal H, Rana JC, Singh K (2020) Understanding genetic variability in the mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genepool. Ann Appl Biol 177(3):346–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghafoor A, Ahmad Z (2005) Diversity of agronomic traits and total seed protein in blackgram Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot 47(2):69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghafoor A, Arshad M (2008) Multivariate analyses for quantitative traits to determine genetic diversity of blackgram Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper germplasm. Pak J Bot 40(6):2307–2313

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghafoor A, Sharif A, Ahmad Z, Zahid MA, Rabbani MA (2001) Genetic diversity in blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Field Crops Res 69(2):183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girish TK, Pratape VM, Rao UP (2012) Nutrient distribution, phenolic acid composition, antioxidant and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory potentials of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) and its milled by-products. Food Res Int 46(1):370–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta DS, Katiyar PK, Kumar J, Kumar A, Gupta S, Singh NP (2020) Development of extra early urdbean genotypes using intra-specific hybridization. J Food Legumes 33(1):56–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Parihar AK (2015) Broadening the genetic base of pulse crops. In: Dixit GP, Singh J, Singh N (ed) Pulses: Challenges & Opportunities, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses, Kanpur, pp 86–101.

  • Gupta S, Das A, Pratap A, Gupta DS (2021) Urdbean. In Pratap, A. and Gupta, S. The Beans and the Peas. Woodhead Publishing, pp 33–54.

  • Gupta S, Gupta SR, Dikshit HK, Singh RA (2001) Variability and its characterization in Indian collections of blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. PGR Newsletter 127:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasanuzzaman ATM, Islam MN, Zhang Y, Zhang CY, Liu TX (2016) Leaf morphological characters can be a factor for intra-varietal preference of whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) among eggplant varieties. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0153880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE (1955) Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J 47(7):314–318. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain AK, Kumar S, Panwar JDS (2009) Antinutritional factors and their detoxification in pulses-a review. Agric Rev 139:94–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson HB (1975) Plant pubescence: an ecological perspective. Bot Rev 41(3):233–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaewwongwal A, Kongjaimun A, Somta P, Chankaew S, Yimram T, Srinives P (2015) Genetic diversity of the blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] gene pool as revealed by SSR markers. Breed Sci 65(2):127–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kakati P, Deka SC, Kotoki D, Saikia S (2010) Effect of traditional methods of processing on the nutrient contents and some antinutritional factors in newly developed cultivars of green gram [Vigna radiata (L) Wilezek] and blackgram [Vigna mungo (L) Hepper] of Assam. India. Int Food Res J 17(2):377–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavitha B, Hemalatha G, Kanchana S, Sundaram SP, Sivasubramaniam K (2013) Physicochemical, functional, pasting properties and nutritional composition of selected blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.) varieties. Indian J Sci Technol 6(10):5386–5394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad W, Burkhardt J, Ebner M, Roth-Nebelsick A (2015) Leaf pubescence as a possibility to increase water use efficiency by promoting condensation. Ecohydrol 8(3):480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lush JL (1940) Intra-sire correlations or regressions of offspring on dam as a method of estimating heritability of characteristics. J Ani Sci 1940(1):293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Nene YL (2006) Indian pulses through the millennia. Asian Agri-Hist 10(3):179–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Patidar M, Sharma H (2017) Correlation and path coefficient studies in Blackgram (Vigna mungo (L) Hepper). J Pharmacogn Phytochem 6(4):1626–1628

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratap A, Kumar J (2011) History, origin and evolution. In: Pratap A, Kumar J (ed) Biology and Breeding of Food Legumes. CABI International, pp 1–18.

  • Punia SS, Gautam NK, Ram B, Verma P, Dheer M, Jain NK, Kuhli NR, Mahavar R, Jat VS (2014) Genetic variability and correlation studies in urdbean (Vigna mungo L.). Legum Res 37(6):580–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana JC, Gautam NK, Gayacharan MS, Yadav R, Tripathi K, Yadav SK, Panwar NS, Bhardwaj R (2016) Genetic resources of pulse crops in India: an overview. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 76:420–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana JC, Sharma TR, Tyagi RK, Chahota RK, Gautam NK, Singh M, Sharma PN, Ojha SN (2015) Characterisation of 4274 accessions of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm conserved in the Indian gene bank for phenological, morphological and agricultural traits. Euphytica 205(2):441–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rathore A, Parsad R, Gupta VK (2004) Computer aided construction and analysis of augmented designs. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 57:320–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson HF (1966) Quantitative genetics in relation to breeding of the centennial of Mendalism. Indian J Genet 26:171–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarikarin N, Srinives P, Kaveeta R, Saksoong P (1999) Effect of seed texture layer on bruchid infestation in mungbean Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Sci Asia 25:203–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh DP, Singh BB, Pratap A (2016) Genetic improvement of mungbean and urdbean and their role in enhancing pulse production in India. Indian J Genet 76(4):550–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souframanien J, Gopalakrishna T (2004) A comparative analysis of genetic diversity in blackgram genotypes using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 109(8):1687–1693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar V, Prasad BV, Shivani D, Rao SS (2020) Studies on genetic correlation and path coefficient analysis of blackgram (Vigna mungo [L.] Hepper) genotypes under rainfed situations. IJCS 8(1):1244–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Suneja Y, Kaur S, Gupta AK, Kaur N (2011) Levels of nutritional constituents and antinutritional factors in blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Food Res Int 44(2):621–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taggar GK, Gill RS (2012) Preference of whitefly (Bemisia tabaci), towards blackgram genotypes: Role of morphological leaf characteristics. Phytoparasitica 40(5):461–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • War AR, Murugesan S, Boddepalli VN, Srinivasan R, Nair RM (2017) Mechanism of Resistance in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek var. radiata] to bruchids, Callosobruchus spp. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Front Plant Sci 8:1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Li P, Zou C, Lu Y, Xie C, Zhang X, Prasanna BM, Olsen MS (2017) Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding. J Exp Bot 68(11):2641–2666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeven AC, De Wet JM (1982) Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity: excluding most ornamentals, forest trees and lower plants. PUDOC, Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gayacharan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 51 kb)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gayacharan, Tripathi, K., Aski, M.S. et al. Understanding genetic diversity in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] collections of Indian National Genebank. Genet Resour Crop Evol 69, 1229–1245 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-021-01301-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-021-01301-6

Keywords

Navigation