Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 65, Issue 6, pp 1795–1807 | Cite as

Vigna khandalensis (Santapau) Raghavan et Wadhwa: a promising underutilized, wild, endemic legume of the Northern Western Ghats, India

  • Suraj D. UmdaleEmail author
  • Jaykumar J. Chavan
  • Mahendra L. Ahire
  • Parthraj R. Kshirsagar
  • Nikhil B. Gaikwad
  • Kangila V. Bhat
Notes on Neglected and Underutilized Crops


Vigna khandalensis (Santapau) Raghavan et Wadhwa, is an endemic legume belonging to subgenus Ceratotropis (Asian Vigna), genus Vigna of the family Fabaceae. It is commonly known as ‘Ranmung’, ‘Jungli mung’ or ‘Badamung’. V. khandalensis is sporadically distributed at high altitude areas in the Northern Western Ghats, India. It is an annual, erect, tall herb growing along roadsides, hilly slopes, pond sides and near human settlements. The legume seeds are utilized by human beings at the time of famine. Surprisingly, the plant remains neglected and underutilized although its high nutritional value. The scant information on V. khandalensis leads us to investigate this underexploited and underutilized legume as a food source for human. The present paper deals with geographical distribution, taxonomy, ecology, agro-morphological characterization, nutritional content and phytochemical analysis. The results obtained in the present investigation provide information on agro-morphological traits and nutritional potential of V. khandalensis. Furthermore, it is promoted as a legume ‘Crop for the Future’ for food security.


Crop wild relative Genetic resources Malnutrition Nutritional value Underutilized legume Vigna khandalensis 



The authors are grateful to the Director, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR), New Delhi and Head, Department of Botany, Yashavantrao Chavan Institute of Science, Satara for providing necessary laboratory facilities.


This work was supported by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) under “National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP) Component-4, sub-project Code: 4143” and Research Advisory Committee, Yashavantrao Chavan Institute of Science, Satara for financial support under “Financial Assistance to faculty for self funded Project (RSS/YCIS/RAC/5)”.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Amarteifio JO, Moholo D (1998) The chemical composition of four legumes consumed in Botswana. J Food Compos Anal 11:329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (2005) Official methods of analysis, 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Babu CR, Sharma SK, Johri BM (1987) Leguminosae-Papilionoideae. Tribe: phaseoleae. Bull Bot Sur India 27:1–28Google Scholar
  4. Bhagat RB, Chambhare M, Mate S, Dudhale A, Zaware BN (2016) Prospective wild edible fruit plants from part of northern Western Ghats (NWG), Mulshi (MS), India. J Med Plants Stud 4:15–19Google Scholar
  5. Bhat R, Karim AA (2009) Exploring the nutritional potential of wild and underutilized legumes. Compe Rev Food Sci Food Saf 8:305–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisht IS, Bhat KV, Lakhanpaul S, Latha M, Jayan PK, Biswas BK, Singh AK (2005) Diversity and genetic resources of wild Vigna species in India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bravo L, Siddhuraju P, Saura-Calixto F (1999) Composition of underexploited Indian pulses: comparison with common legumes. Food Chem 64:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chadburn H (2012) Vigna khandalensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012: e.T19892969A20163711, Downloaded on Feb 2018Google Scholar
  9. Chel-Guerrero L, Perez-Flores V, Betancur-Ancona D, Davila Ortiz G (2002) Functional properties of flours and protein isolates from Phaseolus lunatus and Canavalia ensiformis seeds. J Agric Food Chem 50:578–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cocon M, Daine VJ (1973) Analysis of protein and amino acids. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke T (1903) The flora of the Presidency of Bombay, vol 1. Taylor and Francis, London, p 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delgado-Salinas A, Thulin M, Pasquet R, Weeden N, Lavin M (2011) Vigna (Leguminosae) sensu lato: the names and identities of the American segregate genera. Am J Bot 98:1694–1715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Deshpande S, Sharma BD, Nayar MP (1993) Flora of Mahabaleshwar and adjoining Maharashtra, Flora of India, Series 3. Botanical Survey of India, Government of India, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  14. Dickman SR, Bray RH (1940) Colorimetric determination of phosphate. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed 12:665–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixit TM, Sutar SP, Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Rao SR (2011) Vigna indica, a new name for Vigna trilobata var. pusilla and a note on section Aconitifoliae in India. Rheedea 21:1–7Google Scholar
  16. FDA (2010) Department of Health and Human Services Subchapter B-Food for Human Consumption (Revised as of April 1, 2017) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, vol 2. 21CFR101.9Google Scholar
  17. Hedge JE, Hofreiter BT (1962) Determination of total carbohydrate by anthrone method. In: Whistler RL, Be Miller JN (eds) Methods in carbohydrate chemistry, vol 17. Academic Press, New York, p 420Google Scholar
  18. IBPGR (1985) Descriptors for Vigna mungo and V. radiata (Revised). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. Issac RA, Johnson WC (1975) Collaborative study of wet and dry techniques for the elemental analysis of plant tissue by atomic absorption spectrophotometer. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 58:436–440Google Scholar
  20. Kalidass C, Mohan VR (2012) Nutritional composition and antinutritional factors of little-known species of Vigna. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 15:525–538Google Scholar
  21. Katoch R (2013) Nutritional potential of rice bean (Vigna umbellata): an underutilized legume. J Food Sci 78:C8–C16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan MA, Jacobsen I, Eggum BD (1979) Nutritive value of some improved varieties of legumes. J Sci Food Agric 30:395–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kizil S (2006) Effects of different harvest stages on yield and essential oil content of thyme (Thymus kotschyanus Boiss. & Hohen). Asian J Chem 18:2353–2358Google Scholar
  24. Kumar S, Sane PV (2003) Legumes of South Asia: a check-list. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, KewGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakshminarasimhan P, Sharma BD (1991) Flora of Nasik District. Botanical Survey of India, Government of India, Calcutta, p 644Google Scholar
  26. Lewis G, Schrire B, MacKinder B, Lock M (eds) (2005) Legumes of the world. Royal Botanical Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
  27. Li BW, Cardozo MS (1994) Determination of total dietary fiber in foods and products with little or no starch, nonenzymatic-gravimetric method: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 77:687–689PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowry OH, Rorebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Maréchal R, Mascherpa JM, Stainier F (1978) Étude taxonomique d’un groupe complexe d’espèces des genres Phaseolus et Vigna (Papilionaceae) sur la base de données morphologiques et polliniques traitées par l’analyse informatique [Taxonomic study of one complex group of species from the Phaseolus-Vigna genera based on morphology and palynology data treated to computer analysis]. Boissiera 28:1–273Google Scholar
  30. Mishra DK, Singh NP (2001) Endemic and threatened flowering plants of Maharashtra. Government of India, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  31. Pandiyan M, Senthil N, Ramamoorthi N, Muthiah AR, Tomooka N, Daucan V, Jayaraj T (2010) Interspecific hybridization of Vigna radiata × 13 wild Vigna species for developing MYMV donar. Electron J Plant Breed 1(4):600–610Google Scholar
  32. Raghavan RS, Wadhwa BM (1972) On the nomenclature of Vigna grandis (Dalz. & Gibs.) Verdc. Curr Sci 41:429Google Scholar
  33. Rawat GS, Desai A, Somanathan S, Wikramanayake ED (2001) North Western Ghats moist deciduous forests (IM0134)Google Scholar
  34. Siddhuraju P, Becker K (2001) Effect of various domestic processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro protein and starch digestibility of two indigenous varieties of Indian tribal pulse, Mucuna pruriens var. utilis. J Agric Food Chem 49:3058–3067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Siddhuraju P, Vijayakumari K, Janardhanan K (1992) Nutritional and chemical evaluation of raw seeds of the tribal pulse Vigna trilobata (L.) Verdc. Int J Food Sci Nutr 43:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Siddhuraju P, Vijayakumari K, Janardhanan K (1996) Chemical composition and protein quality of the little-known legume, velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC). J Agric Food Chem 44:2636–2641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh NP, Kulkarni BG (1990) Vigna khandalensis. In: Nayar MP, Sastry ARK (eds) Red data book of Indian plants. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, p 153Google Scholar
  38. Singh U, Singh B (1992) Tropical grain legumes as important human foods. Econ Bot 46:310–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Toklu F, Karaköy T, Hakle I, Bicer T, Brandolini A, Kilian B et al (2009) Genetic variation among lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) landraces from Southeast Turkey. Plant Breed 128:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tomooka N, Vaughan D, Moss H, Maxted N (2002) The Asian Vigna: Genus Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis genetic resources. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Umdale SD, Aitawade MM, Gaikwad NB, Madhavan L, Yadav SR, Rao SR, Bhat KV (2017a) Pollen morphology of Asian Vigna species (genus Vigna; subgenus Ceratotropis) from India and its taxonomic implications. Turk J Bot 41:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Umdale SD, Patil PD, Malik SK, Latha M, Rao SR, Yadav SR, Gaikwad NB, Bhat KV (2017b) Seed coat sculpture of subgenus Ceratotropis (Piper) Verdc., genus Vigna Savi in India and its taxonomic implications. Bot Lett 64:63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walter KS, Gillett HJ (eds) (1998) 1997 IUCN red list of threatened plants. Compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, p 862Google Scholar
  44. Yadav SR, Aitawade MM, ShrikantS Bhat KV, Latha M, John JK, Malik SK, Umdale SD, Rao SR (2014) Genus Vigna Savi in India: an illustrated guide for species identification. NBPGR, New Delhi, p 64Google Scholar
  45. Zia-Ul-Haq AS, Anwer Bukhari S, Amarowicz R, Ercisli S, Jaafar HZE (2014) Compositional studies and biological activities of some mash bean (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) cultivars commonly consumed in Pakistan. Biol Res 47:23–37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyYashavantrao Chavan Institute of ScienceSataraIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyShivaji UniversityKolhapurIndia
  3. 3.Department of BotanyShivaji UniversityKolhapurIndia
  4. 4.Division of Genomic ResourcesNational Bureau of Plant Genetic ResourcesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations