Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 1–10 | Cite as

Gene-specific sex-linked genetic markers in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.)

  • Hoda Badry Mohammed Ali
  • Adam Abubakari
  • Martin Wiehle
  • Konstantin V. Krutovsky
Short Communication
  • 270 Downloads

Abstract

During the past decade, there have been numerous attempts to identify sex-linked molecular genetic markers that can be used to discriminate among male and female trees in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). In our approach to address this biological problem, we applied a comparative genomics approach and used a candidate sex-linked Tormozembryo Defective (TOZ19) gene found to be male-specific in aspen. Using BLAST against the date palm genome assembly, we found a putative Transducin Beta-like Protein 3 (TBL3) gene in date palm that was highly homologous to the TOZ19 gene and sequenced it in three male and four female trees from four economically important date palm cultivars from Egypt. Based on the obtained multiple nucleotide sequence alignments, male- and female-specific date palm haplotypes were identified by screening single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Subsequently, a respective gene fragment in additional five date palm samples comprising three females and two males were cloned and sequenced to independently confirm the previously identified putative sex-linked SNPs. The three putative sex-linked SNPs can be used now to discriminate male and female date palms at their seedling stage. This will further enhance and pave the way for commercial date palm cultivation through seeds. The identified molecular markers are relatively easy, cheap, fast, and reproducible sex identification tools. Female date palms are either homozygous or heterozygous, while male date palms are hemizygous at the putative sex-linked loci.

Keywords

Date palm Dioecious Genetic markers Haplotypes Hemizygous Heterogametic Monoecious Phoenix dactylifera Sex genes SNPs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Alexandra Dolynska for the technical support with the laboratory analysis and Dr. Barbara Vornam for the fruitful discussion of the data and the manuscript (both at Department of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, University of Göttingen, Germany). This study was made possible by the financial support of the DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst—German Academic Exchange Service) through a scholarship to Adam Abubakari.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdallah AB, Sitti K, Leporive P, Du Jardin P (2000) Identification de cultivars de palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.) par l’amplification aléatoire d’ADN (RAPD). Cah Agric 9:103–107Google Scholar
  2. Abubakari A (2016) Sex determination in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). M.Sc. thesis, George-August University of GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  3. Adawy SS, Jiang J, Atia MAM (2014) Identification of novel sex-specific PCR-based marker to distinguish the gender in Egyptian date palm trees. Int J Agric Sci Res 4(5):45–54Google Scholar
  4. Al-Ameri AA, Al-Qurainy F, Gaafar AZ, Khan S, Nadeem M (2016) Molecular identification of sex in Phoenix dactylifera using inter simple sequence repeat markers. Biomed Res Int 4530846:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2016/4530846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Dous EK, George B, Al-Mahmoud ME, Al-Jaber MY, Wang H, Salameh YM, Al-Azwani EK, Chaluvadi SC, Pontaroli A, DeBarry J, Arondel V, Ohlrogge J, Saie IJ, Suliman-Elmeer KM, Bennetzen JL, Kruegger RR, Malek JA (2011) De novo genome sequencing and comparative genomics of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Nat Biotechnol 29(6):521–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Mahmoud ME, Al-Dous EK, Al-Azwani EK, Malek JA (2012) DNA-based assays to distinguish date palm (Arecaceae) gender. Am J Bot 99(1):7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Mamari AH (2013) Application of genomics and molecular genetics in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Ph.D. thesis, University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett SCH, Hough J (2013) Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. J Exp Bot 64(1):67–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrow S (1998) A monograph of Phoenix L. (Palmae: Coryphoideae). Kew Bull 53(3):513–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlesworth D, Guttman DS (1999) The evolution of dioecy and plant sex chromosome systems. In: Ainsworth CC (ed) Sex determination in plants. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 25–49Google Scholar
  11. Cherif E, Castillo K, Chabrillange N, Abdoulkader S, Pintaud J, Santoni S, Salhi-Hannachi A, Glemin S, Aberlenc-Bertossi F (2013) Male-specific DNA markers provide genetic evidence of an XY chromosome system, a recombination arrest and allow the tracing of paternal lineages in date palm. New Phytol 197:409–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherif E, Zehdi-Azouzi S, Crabos A, Castillo K, Chabrillange N, Pintaud JC, Amel SH, Glemin S, Aberlenc-Bertossi F (2016) Evolution of sex chromosomes prior to speciation in the dioecious Phoenix species. J Evol Biol 29(8):1513–1522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dhawan C, Kharb P, Sharma R, Uppal S, Aggarwal RK (2013) Development of male-specific SCAR marker in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Tree Genet Genomes 9:1143–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elmeer K, Mattat I (2012) Marker-assisted sex differentiation in date palm using simple sequence repeats. J Biotechnol 2:241–247Google Scholar
  15. Elsafy M, Zborowska A, Bryngelsson T, Fatih M, Mujaju C, Garkava-Gustavsson L (2016) Elucidating the genetic diversity of farmer cultivars of female date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L.) from Sudan by microsatellite markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63(6):975–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kersten B, Pakull B, Groppe K, Lueneburg J, Fladung M (2014) The sex-linked region in Populus tremuloides Turesson 141 corresponds to a pericentromeric region of about two million base pairs on P. trichocarpa chromosome 19. Plant Biol (Stuttg.) 16:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33(7):1870–1874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Maryam Jaskani JM, Awan FS, Ahmad S, Khan IA (2016) Development of molecular method for sex identification in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) plantlets using novel sex-linked microsatellite markers. Biotech 6(1):1–7Google Scholar
  21. Mathew LS, Spannagl M, Al-Malki A, George B, Torres MF, Al-Dous EK, Al-Azwani EK, Hussein E, Mathew S, Mayer KFX, Mohamoud YA, Suhre K, Malek JA (2014) A first genetic map of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) reveals long-range genome structure conservation in the palms. BMC Genomics 15:285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathew LS, Seidel MA, George B, Mathew S, Spannagl M, Haberer G, Torres MF, Al-Dous EK, Al-Azwani EK, Diboun I, Krueger RR, Mayer KFX, Mohamoud YA, Suhre K, Malek JA (2015) A genome-wide survey of date palm cultivars supports two major subpopulations in Phoenix dactylifera. Gene Genomes Genet 5:1429–1438Google Scholar
  23. Meneely P (2014) Genetic analysis: genes, genomes, and networks in eukaryotes. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ISBN 978-0199219827Google Scholar
  24. Milewicz M, Sawicki J (2012) Mechanisms of sex determination in plants. Čas Slez Muz Opava (A) 61:123–129Google Scholar
  25. Pakull B, Kersten B, Lüuneburg J, Fladung M (2015) A simple PCR-based marker to determine sex in aspen. Plant Biol 17:256–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Trifi M, Rhouma A, Marrakchi M (2000) Phylogenetic relationships in Tunisian date-palms (Phoenix dactylifera L.) germplasm collection using DNA amplification fingerprinting. Agronomie 20:665–671. doi: 10.1051/agro:2000158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Younis RAA, Ismail OM, Soliman SS (2008) Identification of sex-specific DNA markers for date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) using RAPD and ISSR techniques. Res J Agric Biol Sci 4(4):278–284Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Genetics and CytologyNational Research CentreCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Forest Genetics and Forest Tree BreedingGeorg-August University of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  3. 3.Centre for International Rural Development (Tropenzentrum), International Center for Development and Decent Work (ICDD), Faculty of Organic Agricultural SciencesUniversity of KasselWitzenhausenGermany
  4. 4.N. I. Vavilov Institute of General GeneticsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  5. 5.Genome Research and Education CenterSiberian Federal UniversityKrasnoyarskRussia
  6. 6.Department of Ecosystem Science and ManagementTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations