Abstract
Perception of farmers’ about the use of pesticides and genetic erosion of tetraploid wheat landraces of Ethiopia was assessed through focus group discussions with farmers, on-farm observations, personal interviews with farmers, by using structured questionnaires of temporal and spatial methods. A total of 1496 farmers from seven provinces in the country were interviewed. Farmers’ knowledge about pesticide increases suggests that they are not happy on using chemicals because of their negative impact on farm land. About 75 % of the farmers believe that, although the use of pesticides may increase the production of wheat, it has a negative impact on (human) health and environment. Women showed a higher concern for pesticides’ harmfulness than men. Farmers’ valuation of genetic erosion was estimated as reduced importance of landraces, as shown by a the lower proportion of landraces either grown or sold on the market. The four most important factors cited for loss of landraces were reduction in land area per capita, displacement by released/modern varieties of hexaploid wheat and teff, reduced benefit from landraces, and displacement by other crops and chat. Genetic erosion of 100 % was observed for Triticum dicoccon in the provinces of Gojam and Gonder and for T. polonicum in Tigray and Gojam. Overall, genetic erosion in the country was 32.0, 35.3, 55.9, 84.4 and 84.4 % for T. durum Desf., T. turgidum L., T. aethiopicum Jakubz., T. polonicum L. and T. dicoccon Schrank, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abate A, Amera T (2008) An assessment of the pesticide use, practice and hazards in the Ethiopian rift valley. Africa stockpiles program project report
Ahmed N, Englund JE, Åhman I, Lieberg M, Johansson E (2011) Perception of pesticide use by farmers and neighbours in two periurban areas. Sci Tot Environ 412–413:77–86
Bechere E, Kebede H, Belay G (2000) Durum wheat in Ethiopia. An old crop in an ancient land. IBCR, Addis Ababa
Bellon MR, Pham J, Jackson MT (1997) Genetic conservation: a role for rice farmers. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG (eds) Plant genetic conservation: the in situ approach. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 263–289
Bisht IS, Mehta PS, Bhandari DC (2007) Traditional crop diversity and its conservation on-farm for sustainable agricultural production in Kumaon Himalaya of Uttaranchal state: a case study. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:345–357
Bouyer M, Bagdassarian S, Chaabanne S, Mullet E (2001) Personality correlates of risk perception. Risk Anal 21:457–465
Brush SB (1995) In situ conservation of landraces in centers of crop diversity: implication of germplasm conservation and utilization. Crop Sci 35:346–354
Brush SB, Meng E (1998) Farmers’ valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources. Genet Resour Crop Evol 45:139–150
Cochran A (2015) by William Davis. http://www.ethiofreedom.com/modern-wheat-a-perfect-chronic-poison-doctor-says-video/said. Accessed 15 May 2015
CSA (2010) National Statistics (Abstract) of the Central Statistics Agency of Ethiopia. http://www.csa.gov.et/index.php?option=com_rubberdoc&view=category&id=75&Itemid=561
CSA (2014) The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency Agricultural sample survey 2013/2014 (2006 E.C.) Statistical Bulletin volume I report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season) Addis Ababa May, 2014. http://www.csa.gov.et/images/general/news/area%20and%20 production%202013_2014. Accessed 26 June 2015)
Davidson DJ, Freudenburg WR (1996) Gender and environmental risk concerns: a review and analysis of available research. Environ Behav 28:302–339
Dosman DM, Adamowicz WL, Hrudey SE (2001) Socioeconomic determinants of health- and food safety-related risk perceptions. Risk Anal 21:307–317
Dunlap RE, Beus CE (1992) Understanding public concerns about pesticides: an empirical exmination. J Consum Aff 26:418–438
FAO (1996) Global plan of action for the conservation and sustainable utilisation of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO, Rome
Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK (1994) Gender, race, and perception of environmental health, risks. Risk Anal 16:1101–1108
Fogelfors H, Wivstad M, Eckersten H, Holstein F, Johansson S, Verwijst T (2009) Strategic analysis of Swedish agriculture production systems and agricultural landscapes in time of change. Report from the Department of Crop Production Ecology No. 10 SLU
Fowler C, Mooney PP (1990) Shattering: food politics, and the loss of genetic diversity. University of Arizona Press, Tucson
Franzen A, Meyer R (2010) Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: a multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. Eur Sociol Rev 26:219–234
Gashaw A, Mohammed HI, Singh H (2007) Genetic divergence in selected durum wheat genotypes of Ethiopian germplasm. Afr Crop Sci J 15:67–72
Hailu F, Johansson E, Merker A, Belay G, Harjit-Singh Zeleke H (2006) Composition of and variation in high- and low-molecular weight glutenin subunits, and omega gliadins in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat germplasm. Plant Genet Resour 4:134–143
Hailu F, Johansson E, Merker A (2010) Patterns of phenotypic diversity for phonologic and qualitative traits in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat germplasm. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:781–790
Hammer K, Knüpffer H, Xhuveli L, Perrino P (1996) Estimating genetic erosion in landraces—two case studies. Genet Resour Crop Evol 43:329–336
Harlan JR (1971) Agricultural origins: centres and non-centres. Science 174:468–473
Harlan JR (1975) Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188:618–621
Hawkes JG (1983) The diversity of crop plants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hicks B (2012) Agricultural pesticides and human health. http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/health/case_studies/pesticides.html. Accessed April 2015
Institute of Biodiversity Conservation (IBC) (2002) IBC newsletter. October, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Lewis WJ, Van Lenteren JC, Phatak SC, Tumlinson Iii JH (1997) A total system approach to sustainable pest management. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12243–12248
Mekbib F (2008) Genetic erosion of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in the centre of diversity, Ethiopia. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55:351–364
Montgomery ME, Woodworth LM, Nurthen RK, Gilligan DM, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2000) Relationships between population size and loss of genetic diversity: comparisons of experimental results with theoretical predictions. Conserv Genet 1:33–43
Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Grey CNB, Golding J, the ALSPAC Group (2005) Exposure misclassification of household pesticides and risk perception and behaviour. Ann Occup Hyg 49:703–709
Schreinemachers P, Tipraqsa P (2012) Agricultural pesticides and land use intensification in high, middle and low income countries. Food Policy 37:616–626
Soares WL, Porto MFS (2009) Estimating the social cost of pesticide use: an assessment from acute poisoning in Brazil. Ecol Econ 68:2721–2728
Tait J (2001) Pesticide regulation, product innovation and public attitudes. J Environ Monit 3(4):64N–69N
Teklu Y, Hammer K (2006) Farmers’ perception and genetic erosion of tetraploid wheats landraces in Ethiopia. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:1099–1113
Tesemma T, Bechere E (1998) Developing elite durum wheat landrace selections (composites) for Ethiopian peasant farm use: raising productivity while keeping diversity alive. Euphytica 102:323–328
Tsegaye B, Berg T (2007) Genetic erosion of Ethiopian tetraploid wheat landraces in Eastern Shewa, Central Ethiopia. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:715–726
Tsehaye Y (2002) The significance of in situ conservation: a comparative analysis of durum wheat diversity between in situ (Bale and eastern Shewa Zones) and ex situ (Ethiopia) conservation sites. In: Raupp J (ed.) Annual Wheat Newsletter, vol 48. Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA, pp 54–59
van Tassell LW, Ferrell MA, Yang B, Legg DE, Lloyd JE (1999) Pesticide practices and perceptions of Wyoming farmers and ranchers. J Soil Water Conserv 54:410–414
Vavilov NI (1997) Five continents. IPGRI, Rome
WHO (2011) Occupational health and safety risks for the most vulnerable workers. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2011/464436/IPOL-EMPL_ET(2011)464436_EN.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2016
Worede M (1997) Ethiopian in situ conservation. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG (eds) Plant genetic conservation: the in situ approach. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 290–301
Worede M (1998) SOS/E: Promoting Farmers’ Seed- its conservation, enhancement and effective utilization. A paper presented at the SSC—Africa Project Workshop, Harare, Sep 27, Oct 1, 1998
Worede M, Mekbib H (1993) Linking genetic resource conservation to farmers in Ethiopia. In: de Boef W, Amanour K, Wellard K, Bebbington A (eds) Cultivars knowledge. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 78–84
Zaharieva M, Ayana NG, Hakimi AA, Misra SC, Monneveux P (2010) Cultivated emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccon Schrank), an old crop with promising future: a review. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:937–962
Zimmerer KS (1996) Changing fortunes: biodiversity and peasant livelihood in the Peruvian andes. University of California Press, Berkley
Acknowledgments
I am grateful for Ethiopian farmers for their participation and sharing their ideas and knowledge on the different aspects of landraces of wheat and the use of pesticides. The field assistants who helped in interview of farmers and field assessment are highly appreciated. The write up of this publication was done during my scholarship of Swedish Institute, thanks to Swedish Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Assessment of genetic erosion and use of pesticides (questionnaires used in the study that was distributed to farmers through individuals who know their local language)
Appendix 2: Deciding factors and important variables for farmers choosing to grow landraces
Factor | Important variables | Assessment |
---|---|---|
Agro-ecology | Land quality, soil type | Most of the traditional coarse cereals are grown under rain-fed conditions in poor soil as complete mixtures or intercropped. Many of the rare wheat landraces grown under rain-fed conditions are grown in very small patches adapted to specific soil types and microclimate niches |
Market infrastructure | Distance to nearest market | Cash crops such as off-season vegetables are grown for both local and distant markets. Most landraces are grown for household consumption. Not much seed is acquired from off-farm sources |
Land resources | Small and fragmented | There is a high degree of fragmentation of the land due to the rules of the country |
Human resources | Family size | Farmers with large family size invariably grow coarse-grained landraces with high yield potential, regardless of their wealth status and land size |
Economic status and objectives | Land size, percentage of household food | About 55 % are marginal farmers and they are self-sufficient in food for only 83 % of the year and mainly grow coarse grains. Farmers with larger farms grow more cash crops (including farm-saved seeds for sale to resource-poor marginal farmers) and are self-sufficient in food. Only those who have large farms can afford to maintain locally rare landraces |
Comparative advantages | ||
---|---|---|
Traits | Released varieties | Landraces |
Food value (preference in diet in different forms) | Less nutritious | Nutritious (tasteful) |
Storability | Less period | Long period |
Tolerant to draught | Less | High |
Tolerant to disease and pest | Less | High |
Requirement of fertilizer and pesticides | High | Less (sometimes not at all) |
Seed requirements while sawing | More seed | Less seed |
Yield stability | Unstable | More or less stable |
Plant height | Uniform and short | Not uniform and commonly tall |
Production | High | Less |
Appendix 3: Provinces surveyed and household characteristics at the sites included in the study
Provinces | Gender of interviewed farmers | Average family size (number) | Average farm size (hectare) | Average farm size planted with tetraploid wheat (ha) | Average farm size planted with hexaploid wheat (ha) | Total number of households in part of province used for this study | Educational level | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | Total | ≤grade 6 | From 7 to 10 | From 11 to 12 | University graduate | ||||||
Arsi | 167 | 33 | 200 | 4.38 | 2.18 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 128,806 | 40 | 120 | 25 | 15 |
Bale | 166 | 34 | 200 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 181,345 | 35 | 127 | 20 | 18 |
Gojam | 162 | 38 | 200 | 4.35 | 1.83 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 134,226 | 32 | 130 | 17 | 21 |
Gondor | 223 | 25 | 248 | 4.48 | 1.68 | 0.72 | 0.6 | 194,552 | 67 | 133 | 25 | 23 |
Shewa | 160 | 40 | 200 | 4.68 | 1.87 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 131,346 | 56 | 94 | 26 | 24 |
Tigray | 156 | 44 | 200 | 4.68 | 1.78 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 85,572 | 40 | 120 | 27 | 13 |
Wollo | 213 | 35 | 248 | 4.3 | 1.38 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 126,898 | 79 | 125 | 23 | 21 |
Provinces | Age group | Religion | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤30 | 31–45 | 46–60 | >60 | Orthodox | Muslim | Protestant | |
Arsi | 35 | 89 | 51 | 25 | 54 | 120 | 26 |
Bale | 39 | 100 | 38 | 23 | 44 | 98 | 58 |
Gojam | 43 | 107 | 31 | 19 | 160 | 20 | 20 |
Gondor | 37 | 109 | 75 | 27 | 130 | 70 | 48 |
Shewa | 23 | 119 | 37 | 21 | 110 | 57 | 33 |
Tigray | 36 | 94 | 37 | 33 | 120 | 70 | 10 |
Wollo | 22 | 126 | 57 | 43 | 102 | 99 | 47 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hailu, F. Farmers perception of pesticide use and genetic erosion of landraces of tetraploid wheat (Triticum spp.) in Ethiopia. Genet Resour Crop Evol 64, 979–994 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0419-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0419-7