Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 579–586 | Cite as

Waterlogging tolerance in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik. subsp. culinaris) germplasm associated with geographic origin

  • Edi Wiraguna
  • Al Imran Malik
  • William ErskineEmail author
Research Article


Variation in response to climatic and edaphic factors has resulted in the geographic differentiation and specific adaptation of lentil germplasm to its environment. The germination of lentil seeds can be affected by waterlogging caused by relay sowing into standing rice crops. Consequently, there is a demand for waterlogging-adapted lentil genotypes, particularly at germination. This experimentation investigated the effects of waterlogging at germination on a germplasm collection. Firstly, two contrasting genotypes, ATC 70876 and Nugget, were waterlogged for six durations (0, 3, 6, 9, 14 and 21 days) in a pot soil system in the glasshouse. Six days of waterlogging was the duration for germination where genotypes showed the largest contrast in germination rate; therefore, this duration was applied to a larger number (127) of genotypes from 11 countries in a screening trial. Finally, all 127 genotypes were grown in pots in the open to phenotype morphological traits (seed size, above-ground biomass, time to flower and maturity). There was significant variation among genotypes, and those originating from Bangladesh had the highest germination at 21.2 %. The heritability of germination on waterlogged soil among genotypes was intermediate at H2 = 44.8 %. Correlations between morphological and physiological traits showed that the capability of seeds to germinate on waterlogged soil was negatively correlated to time to maturity (r = −0.643). It was concluded that genotypes from Bangladesh are adapted to waterlogging at germination. With an intermediate heritability for germination under waterlogging conditions, selection for relay sowing through waterlogging tolerance at germination is practicable.


Germination Lens culinaris Lentil Waterlogging 



The studentship of author EDW was funded by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). The Australian Centre for Agriculture Research (ACIAR) is gratefully acknowledged for part-funding the research through project CIM-2009-038.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10722_2016_385_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)


  1. Al-Karaki GN (1998) Seed size and water potential effects on water uptake, germination and growth of lentil. J Agron Crop Sci 181:237–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00423.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alo F, Furman BJ, Akhunov E, Dvorak J, Gepts P (2011) Leveraging genomic resources of model species for the assessment of diversity and phylogeny in wild and domesticated lentil. J Hered 102:315–329. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esr015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong W, Boatman DJ (1967) Some field observations relating the growth of bog plants to conditions of soil aeration. J Ecol 55:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barulina H (1930) Lentils of the USSR and other countries. Bull Appl Bot Genet Pl Breed, Leningrad Supplement 40:265–304 (In Russian with English summary). doi: 10.1023/A:1018306723777
  5. Campbell CG (1997) Grass pea, Lathyrus sativus L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  6. Castro J, Hódar JA, Gómez JM (2006) Seed size. In: Basra AS (ed) Handbook of seed science and technology. The Haworth Press, New York, pp 397–427Google Scholar
  7. Crawford RMM (1977) Tolerance of anoxia and ethanol metabolism in germinating seeds. New Phytol 79:511–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1977.tb02235.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erskine W, Myveci K, Izgin N (1981) Screening a world lentil collection for cold tolerance. LENS Newsl 8:5–8Google Scholar
  9. Erskine W, Adham Y, Holly L (1989) Geographic distribution of variation in quantitative traits in a world lentil collection. Euphytica 43:97–103. doi: 10.1007/BF00037901 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erskine W, Muehlbauer FJ, Short RW (1990) Stages of development in lentil. Exp Agr 26:297–302. doi: 10.1017/S0014479700018457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erskine W, Tufail M, Russell A, Tyagi MC, Rahman M, Saxena MC (1993a) Current and future strategies in breeding lentil for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica 73:127–135. doi: 10.1007/BF00027189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erskine W, Saxena NP, Saxena MC (1993b) Iron deficiency in lentil: yield loss and geographic distribution in a germplasm collection. Plant Soil 15:249–254. doi: 10.1007/BF00016290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erskine W, Hussain A, Tahir M, Baksh A, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH (1994) Field evaluation of a model of photothermal flowering responses in a world lentil collection. Theor Appl Genet 88:423–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Erskine W, Sarker A, Ashraf M (2011) Reconstructing an ancient bottleneck of the movement of the lentil (Lens culinaris ssp. culinaris) into South Asia. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:373–381. doi: 10.1007/s10722-010-9582-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esashi Y, Tsukada Y, Ohhara Y (1978) Interrelation between low temperature and anaerobiosis in the induction of germination of cocklebur seed. Funct Plant Biol 5:337–345. doi: 10.1071/PP9780337 Google Scholar
  16. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) An introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. FAO (2015) FAOSTAT Statistical database of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Foolad MR (1996) Response to selection for salt tolerance during germination in tomato seed derived from PI 174263. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 121:1006–1011Google Scholar
  19. Ghassemi-Golezani K, Aliloo AA, Valizadeh M, Moghaddam M (2008) Effects of hydro and osmo-priming on seed germination and field emergence of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj-Napoca 36:29–33Google Scholar
  20. Ginwal HS, Phartyal SS, Rawat PS, Srivastava RL (2005) Seed source variation in morphology, germination and seedling growth of Jatropha curcas Linn. in central India. Silvae Genet 54:76–79Google Scholar
  21. Hou FF, Thseng FS (1991) Studies on the flooding tolerance of soybean seed: varietal differences. Euphytica 57:169–173. doi: 10.1007/BF00023075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ismail AM, Ella ES, Vergara GV, Mackill DJ (2009) Mechanisms associated with tolerance to flooding during germination and early seedling growth in rice (Oryza sativa). Ann Bot 103:197–209. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn211 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jayasundara HPS, Thomson BD, Tang C (1997) Responses of cool season grain legumes to soil abiotic stresses. Adv Agron 63:77–151. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60242-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumutha D, Sairam R, Ezhilmathi K, Chinnusamy V, Meena R (2008) Effect of waterlogging on carbohydrate metabolism in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.): upregulation of sucrose synthase and alcohol dehydrogenase. Plant Sci 175:706–716. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malik AI, Ali MO, Zaman MS, Flower K, Rahman MM, Erskine W (2015a) Relay sowing of lentil (Lens culinaris subsp. culinaris) to intensify rice-based cropping. J Agr Sci. doi: 10.1017/S0021859614001324 Google Scholar
  26. Malik AI, Ailewe TI, Erskine W (2015b) Tolerance of three grain legume species to transient waterlogging. AoB Plants. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv040 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Materne M, Siddique KHM (2009) Agroecology and Crop Adaptation. In: Erskine W, Muehlbauer F, Sarker A, Sharma B (eds) The lentil: botany, production and uses. MPG Books Group, London, pp 47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sayama T, Nakazaki T, Ishikawa G, Yagasaki K, Yamada N, Hirota N, Hirata K, Yoshikawa T, Saito H, Teraishi M, Okumoto Y, Tsukiyama T, Tanisaka T (2009) QTL analysis of seed-flooding tolerance in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.). Plant Sci 176:514–521. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.01.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Srivastava SP, Bhandari TMS, Yadav CR, Joshi M, Erskine W (2000) Boron deficiency in lentil: yield loss and geographic distribution in a germplasm collection. Plant Soil 219:147–151. doi: 10.1023/A:1004708700075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ueno K, Takahashi H (1997) Varietal variation and physiological basis for inhibition of wheat seed germination after excessive water treatment. Euphytica 94:169–173. doi: 10.1023/A:1002976732395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of plants in the old world: the origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe, and the Nile Valley, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edi Wiraguna
    • 1
  • Al Imran Malik
    • 2
  • William Erskine
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Plant BiologyThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Plant Genetics and Breeding (PGB) and Institute of AgricultureThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations