Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular and flow cytometric evaluation of pear (Pyrus L.) genetic resources of the German and Romanian national fruit collections

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 188 German and 28 Romanian pear accessions were evaluated using flow cytometry and molecular markers to detect homonymous and synonymous genotypes, triploids, which are not useful for breeding, and genotypes having favorable traits for breeding. Genotyping was done using a set of 11 simple sequence repeat markers proposed by the European Cooperative Program for Plant Genetic Resources, along with a standard set of six reference pear genotypes used in previous studies. The observed number of alleles ranged between 21 and 38 per locus. Twenty-three accessions could be confirmed as triploids. Because of the expected cross-incompatibility they are only of limited interest for breeding. The study confirmed that 180 of the 188 tested German accessions represent unique genotypes, while some accessions were found to be genetically identical. In parallel additional markers, which are known to be linked to resistance/susceptibility to major pathogens (e.g. black spot, aphid, fire blight, and apple scab), were applied to the German accessions. The comparative screening of the Romanian pear genetic resources demonstrated that only a few accessions with identical/very similar names to German accessions really have an identical fingerprint. Mislabeling and homonymous designation of different genotypes seems to occur frequently in different collections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Ahmed M, Anjum MA, Khan MQ, Ahmed MJ, Pearce S (2010) Evaluation of genetic diversity in Pyrus germplasm native to Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Northern Pakistan) revealed by microsatellite markers. African J Biotechnol 9(49):8323–8333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell RL, Quamme HA, Layne REC, Skirvin RM (1996) Pears. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Fruit breeding, vol I. Tree and tropical fruits. Wiley, New York, pp 441–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E (1965) Plant introduction and genetic conservation: genecological aspect of an urgent world problem. Scottish Plant Breeding Station, pp 27–113

  • Bouvier L, Bourcy M, Boulay M, Tellier M, Guérif P, Denancé C, Durel CE, Lespinasse Y (2012) A new pear scab resistance gene Rvp1 from the European pear cultivar ‘Navara’ maps in a genomic region syntenic to an apple scab resistance gene cluster on linkage group 2. Tree Genet Genom 8:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brini W, Mars M, Hormaza JL (2008) Genetic diversity in local Tunisian pears (Pyrus communis L.) studied with SSR markers. Sci Hortic 115:337–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho KH, Shin IS, Kim KT, Suh EJ, Hong SS, Lee HJ (2009) Development of AFLP and CAPS markers linked to the scab resistance gene Rvn2 in an inter-specific hybrid pear (Pyrus spp.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 84:619–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa F, Weg WE, Stella S, Dondini L, Pratesi D, Musacchi S, Sansavini S (2008) Map position and functional allelic diversity of Md-Exp7, a new putative expansin gene associated with fruit softening in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) and pear (Pyrus communis). Tree Genet Genom 4:575–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KM, Govan CL, Fernández-Fernández F (2008) A new gene for resistance to Dysaphis pyri in pear and identification of flanking microsatellite markers. Genome 51:1026–1031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KM, Fernández-Fernández F, Govan C (2009) Harmonising fingerprinting protocols to allow comparisons between germplasm collections—Pyrus. Acta Hortic 814:103–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira dos Santos ARF, Ramos-Cabrer AM, Díaz-Hernández MB, Pereira-Lorenzo S (2011) Pear diversity in northwestern Spain determined by microsatellites. Acta Hortic 918:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flachowsky H, Hanke M-V (2010) The network of the “German National Fruit Genebank”, a new concept for sustainable preservation of fruit genetic resources. http://www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/fileadmin/www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/NW_and_WG_UPLOADS/Prunus/German%20National%20Fruit%20Genebank.pdf

  • Flachowsky H, Höfer M (2010) The German Fruit Genebank, a decentral network for sustainable preservation of fruit genetic resources. J Kulturpfl 62:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH (1975) Genetic resources survey as a basis for exploration. In: Frankel OH, Hawkes JG (eds) In Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 99–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiman A, Shlizerman L, Golobovitch S, Yablovitz Z, Korchinsky R, Cohen Y, Samach A, Chevreau E, Le Roux PM, Patocchi A, Flaishman MA (2012) Development of a transgenic early flowering pear (Pyrus communis L.) genotype by RNAi silencing of PcTFL1-1 and PcTFL1-2. Planta 235:1239–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frey JE, Frey B, Sauer C, Kellerhals M (2004) Efficient low-cost DNA extraction and multiplex fluorescent PCR method for marker-assisted selection in breeding. Plant Breed 123:554–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasi F, Kurtovica M, Kalamujicb B, Pojskicb N, Grahica J, Kaiserc C, Melandd M (2013) Assessment of European pear (Pyrus communis L.) genetic resources in Bosnia and Herzegovina using microsatellite markers. Sci Hortic 157:74–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katayama H, Uematsu C (2003) Comperative analysis of chloroplast DNA in Pyrus species: physical map and gene localization. Theor Appl Genet 1006:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux P-MF, Christen D, Duffy B, Tartarini S, Dondini L, Yamamoto T, Nishitani C, Terakami S, Lespinasse Y, Kellerhals M, Patocchi A (2012) Redefinition of the map position and validation of a major quantitative trait locus for fire blight resistance of the pear cultivar ‘Harrow Sweet’ (Pyrus communis L.). Plant Breed 131:656–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monte-Corvo L, Cabrita L, Oliveira C, Leitaõ J (2000) Assessment of genetic relationships among Pyrus species and cultivars using AFLP and RAPD markers. Genet Res Crop Evol 47:57–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani C, Terakami S, Sawamura Y, Takada N, Yamamoto T (2009) Development of novel EST-SSR markers derived from Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia). Breed Sci 59:391–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira CM, Mota M, Monte-Corvo L, Goulaõ L, Silva DM (1999) Molecular typing of Pyrus based on RAPD markers. Sci Hortic 79:163–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potter D, Eriksson T, Evans RC, Oh S, Smedmark J, Morgan DR, Kerr M, Robertson KR, Arsenault M, Dickinson TA, Campbell CS (2007) Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Sys Evol 266:5–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubzov GA (1944) Geographical distribution of the genus Pyrus and trends and factors in its evolution. Chic Am Nat 78:358–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sehic J, Garkava-Gustavsson L, Fernández-Fernández F, Nybom H (2012) Genetic diversity in a collection of European pear (Pyrus communis) cultivars determined with SSR markers chosen by ECPGR. Sci Hortic 145:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terakami S, Adachi Y, Iketani H, Sato Y, Sawamura Y, Takada N, Nishitani C, Yamamoto T (2007) Genetic mapping of genes for susceptibility to black spot disease in Japanese pears. Genome 50:735–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wöhner TW, Flachowsky H, Richter K, Garcia-Libreros T, Trognitz F, Hanke M-V, Peil A (2014) QTL mapping of fire blight resistance in Malus × robusta 5 after inoculation with different strains of Erwinia amylovora. Mol Breed 34:217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeven AC, Zhukovsky PM (1975) Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centres of diversity. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, pp 9–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to A. Patocchi and M. Schanze (Agroscope Wädenswil, Switzerland) for providing some pear genotypes’ DNA, which were used to establish the fire blight markers at JKI Dresden (Germany). The authors further acknowledge the Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU) for contributing to the costs of the work (AZ: Puskas_22112013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henryk Flachowsky.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 59 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 39 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puskás, M., Höfer, M., Sestraş, R.E. et al. Molecular and flow cytometric evaluation of pear (Pyrus L.) genetic resources of the German and Romanian national fruit collections. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63, 1023–1033 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0298-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0298-3

Keywords

Navigation