Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 491–498 | Cite as

Microsatellite mapping of the genes for sham ramification and extra glume in spikelets of tetraploid wheat

  • Y. Amagai
  • A. J. Aliyeva
  • N. Kh. Aminov
  • P. Martinek
  • N. Watanabe
  • T. Kuboyama
Research Article

Abstract

The loci for expression of prolonged spikelet rachilla named ‘sham ramification’ in three tetraploid wheat accessions, two accessions of Triticum jakubzineri Udacz. et Schachm. (2n = 4× = 28, genome BBAA) ‘PI 585014’ and ‘R-101-03’ and one sample of Triticum turgidum L. (2n = 4× = 28, genome BBAA) ‘PI 67339’, were mapped by genotyping F2 populations using microsatellite markers. The segregation analysis confirmed that sham ramification was controlled by recessive, epistatic genes, shr1 (sham ramification 1) and shr2 (sham ramification 2). The genotypes of ‘sham ramification’ were shr1shr1Shr2Shr2 for T. jakubzineri and Shr1Shr1shr2shr2 for T. turgidum (PI 67339). Normal rachilla was determined by Shr1Shr1Shr2Shr2. The shr1 gene and the gene for extra glume (exg) were completely linked; and, the shr1/exg gene complex was bracketed by the markers Xbarc319 and Xbarc232 on the long arm of chromosome 5A. In the F2 of PI 67339/LD222 the gene shr2 was bracketed by Xwmc819 and Xwmc794 on the long arm of chromosome 2A.

Keywords

Extra glume Genetic resource Sham ramification Triticum durum Desf. Triticumjakubzineri Udacz. et Schachm. Triticum turgidum 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the gift of seed of tetraploid wheat from the National Small Grain Collection (NSGC), Aberdeen, Idaho, USA. We thank Dr. D. L. Klindworth, USDA-ARS, Northern Crop Science Lab., Fargo, USA for helpful comments on our manuscript. P.M. thanks for project RO0211 of the Ministry of Agriculture of Czech Republic.

References

  1. Aliyeva AJ (2009) Source of a new type of spike branching in hard wheats. Russ Agric Sci 35:144–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aliyeva AJ, Aminov NKh (2011) Inheritance of the branching in hybrid populations among tetraploid wheat species and the new branched spike line 166-Schakheli. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:621–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barabas Z (1959) An induced mutant in Triticum carthlicum with a diagnostic feature of T. vavilovii. Nature 183:1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castagna R, Borghi B, Bossinger G, Salamini F (1993) Induction and characterization of Triticum monococcum mutants affecting plant and ear morphology. J Genet Breed 47:127–138Google Scholar
  5. D’Amato F, Scarazzia Mungnozza T, Bozzini A (1964) Viable mutations in durum wheat induced by radiation and chemicals. Wheat Inform Serv 17(18):2–5Google Scholar
  6. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desai PA (1968) Vavilovoid mutant in Triticum durum Desf. Curr Sci 37:56–57Google Scholar
  8. Desai RM, Bhatia CR (1975) Frequency of vavilovoid mutants induced by radiation and chemical mutagen treatments in durum wheat. Wheat Inform Serv 40:13–14Google Scholar
  9. Dobrovolskaya O, Martinek P, Voylokov AV, Korzun V, Röder MS, Börner A (2009) Microsatellite mapping of genes that determine supernumerary spikelets in wheat (T. aestivum) and rye (S. cereale). Theor Appl Genet 119:867–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goncharov NP, Kondratenko EJA, Bannikova SV, Konovalov AA, Golovnina KA (2007) Comparative genetic analysis of diploid naked wheat Triticum sinskajae and the progenitor T. monococcum accession. Rus J Genet 43:1248–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. González FG, Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (2011) Wheat floret survival as related to pre-anthesis spike growth. J Exp Bot 62:4889–4901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gowayed S (2009) Egyptian wheat. University Kassel, Witzenhausen, Doctoral dissertation, pp 1–145Google Scholar
  13. Hammer K, Filatenko AA, Pistrick K (2011) Taxonomic remarks on Triticum L. and Triticosecale Wittm. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haque MA, Martinek P, Kobayashi S, Kita I, Watanabe N, Kuboyama T (2012) Microsatellite mapping of genes for semi-dwarfism and branched spike in Triticum durum Desf. var. ramosoobscurum Jakubz. ‘‘Vetvistokoloskaya’’. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:831–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kimber G, Sears ER (1987) Evolution in the genus Triticum and the origin of cultivated wheat. In: Heyne EG (ed) Wheat and wheat improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, USA, pp 154–164Google Scholar
  16. Klindworth DL, Williams ND, Joppa LR (1990a) Inheritance of supernumerary spikelets in a tetraploid wheat cross. Genome 33:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klindworth DL, Williams ND, Joppa LR (1990b) Chromosomal location of genes for supernumerary spikelets in tetraploid wheat. Genome 33:515–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klindworth DL, Klindworth MM, Williams ND (1997) Telosomic mapping of four genetic markers in durum wheat. J Hered 88:229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kosambi DD (1944) The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kosuge K, Watanabe N, Kuboyama T, Melnik VM, Yanchenko VI, Rosova MA, Goncharov NP (2008) Cytological and microsatellite mapping of mutant genes for spherical grain and compact spikes in durum wheat. Euphytica 159:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuspira J, MacLagen J, Bhambhani RN, Sadasivaiah RS, Kim N-S (1989) Genetic and cytogenetic analyses of the A genome of Triticum monococcum L. V. Inheritance and linkage relationships of genes determining the expression of 12 qualitative characters. Genome 32:869–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Donin P, Porceddu E, Tuberosa R (2005) A retrospective analysis of genetic diversity in durum wheat elite germplasm based on microsatellite analysis: A case study. In: Royo C, Nachit MM, Fonzo ND, Araus JL, Pfeiffer H, Slafer GA (eds) Durum wheat breeding Current approaches and future strategies. The Haworth Press, New York, pp 99–142Google Scholar
  23. Manly KF, Cudmore RH Jr, Meer JM (2001) Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mam Genome 12:930–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martinek P, Dobrovolskaya OB, Watanabe N, Peng Z-S, Vyhnánek T (2012) Influence of the spike morphological structure of wheat on yield formation and relevant genetic resources. Biodiversity in Agricultural Land and Ecosystem, International Conference of the REVERSE project—INTERREG IVC, 13 June 2012, Piešťany, Slovakia, pp.35–43. (in Czech)Google Scholar
  25. Pennell AL, Halloran GM (1983) Inheritance of supernumerary spikelets in wheat. Euphytica 32:767–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prabhakara-Rao MV, Swaminathan MS (1963) Vavilovoid mutant in Triticum aestivum and the origin of T. vavilovii. Curr Sci 32:132–133Google Scholar
  27. Reynolds MP, Pellegrineschi A, Skowmand B (2005) Sink-limitation to yield and biomass: a summary of some investigations in spring wheat. Ann Appl Biol 146:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Röder MS, Korzun V, Wendehake K, Plaschke J, Tixier MH, Leroy P, Ganal MW (1998a) A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149:2007–2023PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Röder MS, Korzun V, Gill BS, Ganal MW (1998b) The physical mapping of microsatellite markers in wheat. Genome 41:278–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shingh HB, Anderson E, Pal BP (1957) Studies in the genetics of Triticum vavilovii Jakub. Agron J 49:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shitsukawa N, Kinjo H, Takumi S, Murai K (2009) Heterochronic development of the floret meristem determines grain number per spikelet in diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid wheats. Ann Bot 104:243–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Song QJ, Shi JR, Singh S, Fikus EW, Costa JM, Lewis J, Gill BS, Ward R, Cregan PB (2005) Development and mapping of microsatellite (SSR) markers in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 110:550–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sreenivasulu N, Schnurbusch T (2011) A genetic playground for enhancing grain number in cereals. Trends Plant Sci 17:90–101Google Scholar
  34. Torada A, Koike M, Mochida K, Ogihara Y (2006) SSR-based linkage map with new markers using an intraspecific population of common wheat. Theor Appl Genet 112:1042–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Udachin RA, Shakhmedov ISh (1976) New materials in the research of genus Triticum. Trudy po Prikl Bot, Genet i Selekst 56:147–150 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  36. Udachin RA, Shakhmedov ISh (1977) A new wheat species, Triticum jakubzineri. Vestn S kh Nauki Moscow Feb 1977, 2: 41–43 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  37. Upadhaya MD, Swaminathan MS (1969) Mutations induced by ethyl methane sulphonate in Triticum pyramidale. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 29:338–341Google Scholar
  38. Zhang W, Li A, Tian J, Zhao L (2012) Development of near-isogenic lines of wheat carrying different spike branching genes and their agronomic and spike characters. J Agric Sci 4:215–221Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Amagai
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. J. Aliyeva
    • 3
  • N. Kh. Aminov
    • 3
  • P. Martinek
    • 4
  • N. Watanabe
    • 1
  • T. Kuboyama
    • 1
  1. 1.College of AgricultureIbaraki UniversityInashikiJapan
  2. 2.United Graduate School of Agricultural ScienceTokyo University of Agriculture and TechnologyFuchuJapan
  3. 3.Cytogenetics Department, Genetic Resources InstituteAzerbaijan National Academy of SciencesBakuAzerbaijan
  4. 4.Agrotest Fyto, Ltd.KroměřížCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations