Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 1407–1421 | Cite as

Preservation of seed viability during 25 years of storage under standard genebank conditions

  • R. van Treuren
  • E. C. de Groot
  • Th. J. L. van Hintum
Research Article

Abstract

Maintaining sufficient viability is critical to the sustainability of ex situ conserved seed collections. For this reason, accessions are regenerated when viability falls below a predefined threshold. Viability is monitored by determining the germination ability of accessions at predefined time intervals. Optimizing the frequency of these germination tests, in order to avoid waste of resources, is hampered by the scarce availability of data about seed longevity, particularly for material maintained under genebank conditions. Here we report on the analysis of nearly 40,000 germination test results collected for a wide range of crop species over a 25-years period by the centre for genetic resources, the Netherlands (CGN), where seeds of genebank accessions are dried to 3–7 % moisture content and stored for the long term under near-vacuum in aluminium foil bags at −20 °C. The results indicate that seed viability is well maintained for the large majority of seed lots during the first 25 years after regeneration as only 3.3 % of the monitoring tests revealed below-threshold germination values. It is argued that the majority of these sub-standard seed lots are due to other causes than seed ageing, including dormancy problems and estimation error in germination testing. For material, maintained under the seed management procedures and storage conditions practiced by CGN, it is therefore recommended to delay the first germination monitoring tests to 25 years after regeneration.

Keywords

Accession maintenance Ex situ conservation Genebanks Germination testing Seed aging Seed longevity 

References

  1. CGRFA (2012) Draft Updated Genebank Standards: minimum standards for conservation of orthodox seeds. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Available from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/PGR/ITWG/ITWG5/dugbs-NFP-6jan2011.pdf
  2. Dickie JB, Ellis RH, Kraak HL, Ryder K, Tompsett PB (1990) Temperature and seed storage longevity. Ann Bot 65:197–204Google Scholar
  3. Ellis RH (1991) The longevity of seeds. HortScience 26:1119–1125Google Scholar
  4. Ellis RH, Roberts EH (1980) Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Ann Bot 45:13–30Google Scholar
  5. Ellis RH, Roberts EH (1982) Desiccation, rehydration, germination, imbibition injury and longevity of pea seeds (Pisum sativum). Seed Sci Technol 10:501–508Google Scholar
  6. Ellis RH, Hong TD, Roberts EH (1987) The development of desiccation-tolerance and maximum seed quality during seed maturation in six grain legumes. Ann Bot 59:23–29Google Scholar
  7. Ellis RH, Hong TD, Roberts EH (1989) A comparison of the low-moisture-content-limit to the logarithmic relation between seed moisture and longevity in twelve species. Ann Bot 63:601–611Google Scholar
  8. Engels JMM, Visser L (2003) A guide to effective management of germplasm collections. IPGRI Handbooks for Genebanks No. 6. IPGRI, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  9. FAO (2010) The Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO/IPGRI (1994) Genebank Standards. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, International plant genetic resources institute, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  11. Flynn S, Turner RM (2004) Seed viability equation: viability utility (release 1.0, September 2004). http://data.kew.org/sid/viability/index.html
  12. Freitas RA, Dias DCFS, Oliveira GA, Dias LAS, José IC (2006) Physiological and biochemical changes in naturally and artificially aged cotton seeds. Seed Sci Technol 34:253–264Google Scholar
  13. Groot SPC, de Groot L (2007) Seed quality in genetic resources conservation—a case study at the centre for genetic resources, the Netherlands. Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Hay FR, Probert RJ (1995) Seed maturity and the effects of different drying conditions on desiccation tolerance and seed longevity in foxglove (Digitalis purpurea L.). Ann Bot 76:639–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hay FR, de Guzman F, Ellis D, Makahiya H, Borromeo T, Sackville Hamilton NR (2012) Viability of Oryza sativa L. seeds stored under genebank conditions for up to 30 years. Genet Resour Crop Evol, DOI 10.1007/s10722-012-9833-7
  16. ISTA (2012) International seed testing association. International Rules for Seed Testing, BassersdorfGoogle Scholar
  17. Jalink H, van der Schoor R, Frandas A, van Pijlen JG, Bino RJ (1998) Chlorophyll fluorescence of Brassica oleracea seeds as a non-destructive marker for seed maturity and seed performance. Seed Sci Res 8:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kraak HL, Vos J (1987) Seed viability constants for lettuce. Ann Bot 59:353–359Google Scholar
  19. Nagel M, Börner A (2010) The longevity of crop seeds stored under ambient conditions. Seed Sci Res 20:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nagel M, Vogel H, Landjeva S, Buck-Sorlin G, Lohwasser U, Scholz U, Börner A (2009) Seed conservation in ex situ genebanks—genetic studies on longevity in barley. Euphytica 170:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nagel M, Rosenhauer M, Willner E, Snowdon RJ, Friedt W, Börner A (2011) Seed longevity in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)—genetic variation and QTL mapping. Plant Genet Resour Charact Util 9:260–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pérez-García F, González-Benito ME, Gómez-Campo C (2007) High viability recorded in ultra-dry seeds of 37 species of Brassicaceae after almost 40 years of storage. Seed Sci Technol 35:143–153Google Scholar
  23. Pérez-García F, Gómez-Campo C, Ellis RH (2009) Successful long-term ultra dry storage of seed of 15 species of Brassicaceae in a genebank: variation in ability to germinate over 40 years and dormancy. Seed Sci Technol 37:640–649Google Scholar
  24. Priestley DA, Cullinan VI, Wolfe J (1985) Differences in seed longevity at the species level. Plant, Cell Environ 8:557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rao NK, Hanson J, Dulloo ME, Ghosh K, Nowell D, Larinde M (2006) Manual of seed handling in genebanks. Handbooks for genebanks No. 8. Bioversity International, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  26. Shen-Miller J, Mudgett MB, Schopf JW, Clarke S, Berger R (1995) Exceptional seed longevity and robust growth: ancient sacred lotus from China. Am J Bot 82:1367–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith RD, Dickie JB, Linnington SH, Pritchard HW, Probert RJ (2003) Seed conservation: turning science into practice. The Royal Botanical Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
  28. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, second edition. Freeman WH and Company, New York, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  29. Trapp A II, Dixon P, Widrlechner MP, Kovach DA (2012) Scheduling viability tests for seeds in long-term storage based on a Bayesian multi-level model. J Agric Biol Envir S 17:192–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Hintum ThJL, van Treuren R (2012) Reliability of germination testing of ex-situ conserved seeds: a genebank case study on outsourced analyses. Plant Genet Resour Charact Util 10:134–136Google Scholar
  31. Van Hintum TJL, van de Wiel CMM, Visser DL, van Treuren R, Vosman B (2007) The distribution of genetic diversity in a Brassica oleracea gene bank collection related to the effects on diversity of regeneration, as measured with AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 114:777–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walters C, Wheeler LM, Grotenhuis JM (2005) Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: species characteristics. Seed Sci Res 15:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. van Treuren
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. C. de Groot
    • 1
    • 2
  • Th. J. L. van Hintum
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Genetic ResourcesWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Wageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations