Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular differentiation in Indian Citrus L. (Rutaceae) inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Molecular differentiation in 24 accessions representing 19 taxa of Indian Citrus has been examined through sequence analysis of Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of nrDNA. Sequence length in the 24 accessions of Citrus taxa ranged from 512 to 665 bp (ITS1 & ITS2 partial and 5.8S complete sequence). The ITS sequences were very rich in G+C content ranging from 61.40 to 66.60% with an average of 64.2%. Genetic distance within Citrus group ranged from 0 to 13.4% with an average of 4.6%, showing moderate rate of nucleotide divergence. The phylogeny was inferred using the Maximum parsimony (MP) and Neighbor-Joining (NJ) methods. Both MP and NJ trees separated all the 24 accessions of Citrus into six distinct clusters. The disposition of all the accessions of Citrus in separate clusters in ITS-derived dendrograms was partly in accordance with the morpho-taxonomic affinities of the target taxa. This study supports the concept of Citrus medica (citron), C. reticulata (mandarin), and C. maxima (pummelo) as the basic species of the genus. However, ITS marker could not find any clear cut differentiation between subgenera Citrus and Papeda as proposed in Swingle’s Citrus classification system. The present study also supports the distinctiveness of C. indica (Indian wild orange), C. latipes (Khasi papeda) and C. hystrix (Melanesian papeda) as true species, besides elucidating the probable hybrid origin and relationships among the cultivated species/biotypes, such as Citrus ×aurantiifolia (sour lime) C. ×limon (lemon), C. ×taitensis (Indian rough lemon), C. limettioides (sweet lime), C. ×aurantium (including sour and sweet oranges and grapefruit), and other indigenous varieties of Indian origin: C. megaloxycarpa (sour pummelo), C. karna (karna orange), C. pseudolimon (Hill lemon), ‘Memang athur’, ‘Pummelo-lemon’ and ‘Kathairi nimbu’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abkenar AA, Isshiki S, Tashino Y (2004) Phylogenetic relationships in the true Citrus fruit trees revealed by PCR-RFLP analysis of cp DNA. Sci Hortic 102:233–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altschul SF, Thomas LM, Alejandro AS et al (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2010) Indian horticulture database. National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Gurgaon

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo EF, Queiroz LP, Machado MA (2003) What is Citrus? Taxonomic implications from a study of cp-DNA evolution in the tribe Citreae (Rutaceae subfamily Aurantioideae). Org Divers Evol 3:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BG (1993) Molecular phylogenetics of calycadenia (Compositae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: chromosomal and morphological evolution reexamined. Am J Bot 80:222–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ (1995) The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 82:247–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley NA, Roose ML, Krueger RR, Federici CT (2006) Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Theor Appl Genet 112:1519–1531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett HC, Rhodes AM (1976) A numerical taxonomic study of affinity relationships in cultivated Citrus and its close relatives. Syst Bot 1:105–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer RJ, Mabberley DJ, Morton CM, Cathy H, Sharma IK, Pfeil BE, Rich S, Hitchcock R, Sykes S (2009) A molecular phylogeny of the orange subfamily (Rutaceae: Aurantioideae) using nine cpDNA sequences. Am J Bot 96:668–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SC, Dutta S (1956) Classification of Citrus fruits of Assam. Sci Monogr 20. ICAR, New Delhi, p 110

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase W, Morton CM, Kallunki JA (1999) Phylogenetic relationships of Rutaceae: a cladistic analysis of the subfamilies using evidence from rbcL and atpB sequence variation. Am J Bot 8:1191–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugo G, Di Giacomo A (2002) Citrus: the genus Citrus, medicinal and aromatic plants—industrial profiles. Taylor & Francis group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang DQ, Krueger RR, Roose ML (1998) Phylogenetic relationships among selected Citrus germplasm accessions revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 123:612–617

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Federici CT, Fang DQ, Scora RW et al (1998) Phylogenetic relationship within the genus Citrus (Rutaceae) and related genera as revealed by RFLP and RAPD analysis. Theor Appl Genet 96:812–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fietch WM (1971) Towards defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20:406–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán B, Vargas P (2005) Systematics, character evolution, and biogeography of Cistus L. (Cistaceae) based on ITS, trnL-trnF, and matK sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 37:644–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero R, Asins MJ, Carbonell EA, Navarro L (1996) Genetic diversity in the orange subfamily Aurantoideae. I. Interspecies and intragenus genetic variability. Theor Appl Genet 92:599–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins D, Thompson J, Gibson T (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson RW (1965) Taxonomy and nomenclature in citrus fruits. In: Krishnamurthi S (ed) Advances in agricultural sciences and their applications. Madras Agric J, Madras, pp 317–331

    Google Scholar 

  • IPGRI (1999) Descriptors for Citrus. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Jena SN, Kumar S, Nair KN (2009) Molecular phylogeny in Indian Citrus L. (Rutaceae) inferred through PCR-RFLP and trnL-trnF sequence data of chloroplast DNA. Sci Horti 199:403–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobes DV, Thien LB (1997) A conserved motif in the 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is a useful diagnostic marker for plant internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15:326–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jobst J, King K, Hemleben V (1998) Molecular evolution of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) and phylogenetic relationships among species of the family Cucurbitaceae. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:204–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kollipara KP, Singh RJ, Hymowitz T (1997) Phylogenetic and genomic relationships in the genus Glycine Willd. Based on sequences from the ITS region of nuclear rDNA. Genome 40:57–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Jena SN, Nair KN (2010) ISSR polymorphism in Indian Wild Orange, C. indica Tanaka (Rutaceae) and related wild species in North-east India. Sci Horti 123:350–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyndt T, Dung TN, Goetghebeur P, Toan HT, Gheysen G (2010) Analysis of ITS of the rDNA to infer phylogenetic relationship among Veitnamese Citrus accessions. Genet Res Crop Evol 57:183–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lashermes P, Combes MC, Trouslot P, Charrier A (1997) Phylogenetic relationships of coffee-tree species (Coffea L.) as inferred from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Theor Appl Genet 94:947–955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang G, Xiong G, Guo Q, He Q, Li X (2007) AFLP analysis and the taxonomy of Citrus. Acta Hortic (ISHS) 760:137–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Zhou Z, Xie R (2011) Molecular phylogeny of the true Citrus fruit trees group (Aurantioideae, Rutaceae) as inferred from chloroplast DNA sequences. Agri Sci China 10:49–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lushington AW (1910) The genus Citrus. Indian Forester 36:323–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley DJ (1997) A classification of edible Citrus (Rutaceae). Telopea 7:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley DJ (1998) Australian Citreae with notes on other Aurantioideae (Rutaceae). Telopea 7:333–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley DJ (2004) Citrus (Rutaceae): a review of recent advances in etymology, systematics and medical applications. Blumea 49:481–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley DJ (2008) Mabberley’s plant-book: a portable dictionary of plants, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Avon

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik SK, Chaudhury R, Dhariwal OP, Kalia RK (2006) Collection and characterization of Citrus indica Tanaka and C. macroptera Montr.: wild endangered species of northeastern India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:1485–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mole BJ, Udovicic F, Ladiges PY, Duretto MF (2004) Molecular phylogeny of Phebalium (Rutaceae: Boronieae) and related genera based on the nrDNA regions ITS 1 + 2. Pl Syst Evol 249:197–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore GA (2001) Oranges and lemons: clues to the taxonomy of Citrus from molecular markers. Trends Genet 17:536–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morton CM, Grant M, Blackmore S (2003) Phylogenetic relationships of the Aurantioideae inferred from cpDNA sequenced data. Am J Bot 90:1463–1469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair KN, Nayar MP (1997) Rutaceae. In: Hajra PK, Nair VJ, Daniel P (eds) Flora of India, vol IV. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, pp 229–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolosi E, Deng ZN, Genetile A et al (2000) Citrus phylogeny and genetic origin of important species as investigated by molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 100:1155–1166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolosi E (2007) Origin and taxonomy. In: Khan I (ed) Citrus: genetics. Breeding and Biotechnology, CAB International, UK, pp 19–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pang XM, Hu CG, Deng XX (2007) Phylogenetic relationships within Citrus and its related genera as inferred from AFLP markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:429–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pessina D, Gentili R, Barcacciab G, Nicolèb S, Rossic G, Barbestia S, Sgorbatia S (2011) DNA content, morphometric and molecular marker analyses of Citrus limonimedica, C. limon and C. medica for the determination of their variability and genetic relationships within the genus Citrus. Sci Horti 129:663–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeil BE, Crisp MD (2008) The age and biogeography of Citrus and the orange subfamily (Rutaceae:Aurantioideae) in Australasia and New Caledonia. Am J Bot 95:1621–1631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogstad SH (1993) Saturated NaCl-CTAB solution as a means of field preservation leaves for DNA analysis. Taxon 41:701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, ver. 2.10e, Exeter Ltd., Setauket, NY

  • Salinas J, Matassi G, Montero LM, Bernardi G (1988) Compositional compartmentalization and compositional patterns in the nuclear genomes of plants. Nucleic Acids Res 16:4269–4285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scora RW (1988) Biochemistry, taxonomy and evolution of modern cultivated Citrus. In: Goren RK, Mendel K (eds) Proceedings of 6th international Citrus congress, Margraf Scientific Books, Weikesheim, pp 277–289

  • Shahsavar AR, Izadpanah K, Tafazoli E, Tabatabaei BES (2007) Characterization of Citrus germplasm including unknown variants by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Sci Horti 112:310–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R (1967) A key of the Citrus fruits. Ind J Hortic 4:71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Nath N (1969) Practical approach to the classification of Citrus. In: Chapman HD (ed) Proceedings of International Citrus Symposium, vol 1, pp 435–440

  • Swingle WT (1943) The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives. In: Webber HJ, Batchelor DL (eds) The Citrus industry, vol 1. University of California, Berkeley, pp 128–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingle WT, Reece PC (1967) The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives in the orange subfamily. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor DL (eds) The Citrus industry, vol 1. University of California, Berkeley, pp 190–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenetics by using the NJ methods. Proc Nat Acad Sci (USA) 101:11030–11035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, et al. (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. doi:10.1093/molbev/msm092

  • Tanaka T (1928) On certain new species of Citrus. Studia Citrologia 2:155–164. (Japanese with English & Latin resume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka T (1954) Species problem in Citrus. Japanese Society for promotion of Science, Ueno, p 152

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka T (1977) Fundamental discussion of Citrus classification. Stud Citrol 14:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber HJ (1943) Cultivated varieties of Citrus. In: Webber HJ, Batchelor DL (eds) The Citrus industry, vol I. University of California, Berkeley, pp 475–668

    Google Scholar 

  • White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee SB, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis N, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White J (eds) PCR—protocols and applications—a laboratory manual. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu CJ, Bau L, Zhang B, Bei ZM, Ye XY, Zhang SL, Chen KS (2006) Parentage analysis of huyou (Citrus changshanensis) based on internal transcribed spacer sequences. Pl Breed 125:519–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Director, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute (NBRI) for providing facilities to carry out this work, and the officers & staff of Nokrek Biosphere Reserve (NBR), Tura, Meghalaya for their help and support during exploration trips to NBR. The financial support received from the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi and the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi to carry out this work is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Narayanan Nair.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Nair, K.N. & Jena, S.N. Molecular differentiation in Indian Citrus L. (Rutaceae) inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60, 59–75 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9814-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9814-x

Keywords

Navigation