Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 201–209 | Cite as

Analysis of genetic diversity among European and Asian fig varieties (Ficus carica L.) using ISSR, RAPD, and SSR markers

  • Hidetoshi IkegamiEmail author
  • Hitoshi Nogata
  • Keita Hirashima
  • Mitsuo Awamura
  • Takao Nakahara
Research Article


Nineteen fig varieties and lines from Europe and Asia have been fingerprinted by ISSR, RAPD, and SSR markers, respectively, using 13, 19, and 13 primer combinations. All primers produced 258 loci, with the highest number of loci (119) generated by RAPD (R p: 48.42). Clustering analysis was applied to the three marker datasets to elucidate the genetic structure and relationships among these varieties. Mean genetic similarities were 0.787, 0.717, and 0.749, respectively, as determined using ISSR, RAPD, and SSR. Each marker system produced incompletely separated clusters, although a weak binding group based on race type appeared in the combined dataset. Comparisons of coefficients revealed no correlation between different similarity matrices; congruence was observed between similarity matrices and co-phenetic matrices in all markers. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that most of the total polymorphism was attributable to within-group variance (ISSRs + RAPDs, 97.41%; SSRs, 90.18%). These results suggest that the genetic diversity of this fig population is low and that multiple marker utilization is critical to estimate the relatedness of figs at the variety level. Additionally, it was presumed that ‘Houraihi’, the oldest variety in Japan, was disseminated independently of other foreign varieties in the 17th century or before then.


Ficus carica L. Genetic diversity ISSR RAPD SSR Varietal relation 



We are grateful to Dr. Tanisaka for the critical reading of this manuscript.


  1. Aksoy U (1998) Why fig? An old taste and a new perspective. Acta Hortic 480:25–26Google Scholar
  2. Bohn M, Utz HF, Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic similarities among winter wheat cultivars determined on the basis of RFLPs, AFLPs and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Sci 39:228–237Google Scholar
  3. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabrita LF, Aksoy U, Hepaksoy S, Leitao JM (2001) Suitability of isozyme, RAPD and AFLP markers to assess genetic differences and relatedness among fig (Ficus carica L.) clones. Sci Hortic 87:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Condit IJ (1947) The fig. Chronica Botanica Co., WalthamGoogle Scholar
  6. De Masi L, Castaldo D, Galano G, Minasi P, Laratta B (2005) Genotyping of fig (Ficus carica L.) via RAPD markers. J Sci Food Agric 85:2235–2242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert JE, Lewis RV, Wilkinson MJ, Caligari PDS (1999) Developing an appropriate strategy to assess genetic variability in plant germplasm collections. Theor Appl Genet 98:1125–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giraldo E, Viruel MA, Lopez-Corrales M, Hormaza JI (2005) Characterisation and cross-species transferability of microsatellites in the common fig (Ficus carica L.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 80:217–224Google Scholar
  9. IBPGR (1986) Genetic resources of tropical and sub-tropical fruits and nuts. IBPGR Rome, pp 63–69Google Scholar
  10. Jones DA (1972) Blood samples: probability of discrimination. J Forensic Sci Soc 12:355–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khadari B, Hochu I, Satoni S, Kjellberg F (2001) Identification and characterization of microsatellite loci in the common fig (Ficus carica L.) and representative species of the genus Ficus. Mol Ecol Notes 1:191–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khadari B, Ater M, Mamouni A, Roger JP, Kjellberg F (2004) Molecular characterization of Moroccan fig germplasm using inter simple sequence repeat and simple sequence repeat markers to establish a reference collection. HortScience 40(1):29–32Google Scholar
  13. Khadari B, Grout C, Santoni S, Kjellberg F (2005) Contrasted genetic diversity and differentiation among Mediterranean populations of Ficus carica L.: a study using mtDNA RFLP. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khoshbakht K, Hammer K (2006) Savadkouh (Iran) – an evolutionary center for fruit trees and shrubs. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamboy WF, Alpha CG (1998) Using simple sequence repeats (SSRs) for DNA fingerprinting germplasm accessions of grape (Vitis L.) species. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:182–188Google Scholar
  16. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetical variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5267–5273Google Scholar
  19. Papadopoulou K, Ehaliotis C, Tourna M, Kastanis P, Karydis I, Zervakis G (2002) Genetic relatedness among dioecious Ficus carica L. cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, and evaluation of agronomic and morphological characters. Genetica 114:183–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pejic I, Ajmone-Marsan P, Morgante M, Kozumplick V, Castiglioni P, Taramino G et al (1998) Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 97:1248–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S et al (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ (1999) A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rohlf FJ (2006) NTSYSpc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Ver. 2.2, Exeter Software, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Sadder MT, Ateyyeh AF (2006) Molecular assessment of polymorphism among local Jordanian genotypes of common fig (Ficus carica L.). Sci Hortic Amsterdam 107:347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salhi-Hannachi A, Trifi M, Zehdi S, Hedhi J, Mars M, Rhouma A et al (2004) Inter simple sequence repeat fingerprints to access genetic diversity in Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) germplasm. Genet Resour Crop Evol 51:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salhi-Hannachi A, Chatti K, Mars M, Marrakchi M, Trifi M (2005) Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in two Tunisian collections of fig cultivars based on random amplified polymorphic DNA and inter simple sequence repeats fingerprints. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:563–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sehgal D, Raina SN (2005) Genotyping safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivars by DNA fingerprints. Euphytica 146:67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Storey WB et al (1975) Figs. In: Janick J, Moore J (eds) Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, Indiana, pp 568–589Google Scholar
  29. Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323–354Google Scholar
  30. Zukovskij PM (1950) Ficus. Cultivated plants and their wild relatives. State Publishing House Sov Sci Mosc 1950:58–59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hidetoshi Ikegami
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hitoshi Nogata
    • 2
  • Keita Hirashima
    • 1
  • Mitsuo Awamura
    • 2
  • Takao Nakahara
    • 1
  1. 1.Biotechnology DivisionFukuoka Agricultural Research CenterFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Fukuoka Agricultural Research Center Buzen BranchFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations