Skip to main content
Log in

The endangered future of organoleptically prestigious European landraces: Ganxet bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as an example of a crop originating in the Americas

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environmental and cultural diversity of Southwest Europe favored the diversification of crops arriving from America, giving rise to many new landraces. Gastronomy played an important role in their evolution. These landraces would later be substituted by genetically improved varieties, but some, like the Ganxet bean cultivated in the northeast of the Iberian Peninsula, have survived thanks to their superior sensory qualities. The distinctive flat and extremely hooked shape of the Ganxet seed has facilitated the detection of altered germplasm yielding less hooked seeds. In the present study, the use of RAPD and ALFP markers has enabled us to estimate the variability of Ganxet entries, determine the sources of introgression, and discuss the dangers menacing European landraces with superior organoleptic qualities. The low variability among prototypical Ganxet lines increased as less and less hooked materials were included in the analysis. The more productive Great Northern-type germplasm was found to be the main source of introgression in Ganxet. Successful introgression of more productive improved germplasm into landraces is probably a general phenomenon. So, in the absence of morphological markers, objective studies of the organoleptic value of landraces and thorough description using genetic markers become essential to ensure that the growing commercial interest in superior landraces is not reduced to a mere marketing operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beebe SE, Ochoa I, Skroch P, Nienhuis J, Tivang J (1995) Genetic diversity among common bean breeding lines developed for Central America. Crop Sci 35:1178–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benham JJ (2001) Genographer, version 1.6.0. Montana State University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bio-Rad Laboratories (2002) Quantity One (Quantification software). User guide for version 4.4. Windows and Macintosh. The Discovery Series, Hercules, CA, USA

  • Bosch L, Casañas F, Sánchez E, Pujola M, Nuez F (1998) Selection L67, a Pure Line with True Seed Type of the Ganxet Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) inbred. HortScience 33:905–906

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandolini GA (1968) European races of corn. Proc. 24th. Annu. Corn and Sorgum Res. Conf. Washington D.C. ASTA Publ No. 24:36–48

  • Casañas F, Bosch L, Sánchez E, Romero del Castillo R, Valero J, Baldi M, Mestres J, Nuez F (1998) Características de la alubia Ganxet (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) y acciones para su conservación. Investigación Agraria: Prod. Prot. Veg. 13:43–55

  • Casañas F, Bosch L, Pujolà M, Sánchez E, Sorribas X, Baldi M, Nuez F (1999) Characteristics of a common bean landrace (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of great culinary value and selection of a commercial inbred line. J Sci Food Agric 79:693–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattan-Toupance I, Michalakis Y, Neema C (1998) Genetic structure of wild bean populations in their South-Andean centre of origin. Theor Appl Genet 96:844–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle DL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:1315

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RJ, Leng ER (1965) Classification of some indigenous maize collections from southern and southeastern Europe. Euphytica 14:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberger K, Gugerli F, Schneller JJ (2000) Morphological and molecular diversity of Swiss common bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae) and their origin. Bot Helv 110:61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquinas-Alcázar J, Nuez F (1995) Situación taxonómica, domesticación y difusión del tomate. In: Nuez F (ed) El Cultivo del Tomate, Mundiprensa, pp 15–42

  • Felsenstein J (1994) Phylogeny Inference Package (PHYLIP), version 3.6. University of Washington, Seattle, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyre R, Rios R, Guzmán L, Debouck DG, Gepts P (1996) Ecogeograhic distribution of Phaseolus spp. (Fabaceae) in Bolivia. Econ Bot 50:195–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham GC, Henry RJ, Redden RJ (1994) Identification of navy bean varieties using random amplification of polymorphic DNA. Aust J Exp Agric 34:1173–1176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haley SD, Miklas PN, Afanador L, Kelly JD (1994) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker variability between and within gene pools of common bean. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 119:122–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lanteri S, Acquadro A, Quagliotti L, Portis E (2003) PAPD and AFLP assessment of genetic variation in a landrace of pepper (Capsicum annum L.) grown in North-West Italy. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:723–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lioi L, Piergiovanni AR, Pignone D, Puglisi S, Santantonio M, Sonnante G (2005) Genetic diversity of some surviving on-farm Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Plant Breed 124:576–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miklas PN, Kelly JD (1992) Identifying bean DNA polymorphisms using the Polymerase Chain Reaction. Ann Rep Bean Improv Coop 35:21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri V, Tosti N (2002) Genetic diversity within a common bean landrace of potential economic value: its relevance for on-farm conservation and product certification. J Genet Breed 56:113–118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowosielski J, Podyma W (2001) Molecular research on genetic diversity of Polish varieties and Landraces of Phaseolus. In: Swiecicki W, Naganowska B, Wolko B (eds) Broad variation and precise characterization limitation for the future. Proceedings of the XVIth EUCARPIA Genetic Resources Section workshop, Poznan, Poland, May 2001, pp 247–252

  • Page RDM (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12: 357–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piergiovanni A, Taranto G, Losavio FP, Pignone D (2006) Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from Abruzzo and Lazio regions (Central Italy). Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujolà M, Casañas F, Bosch L, Almirall A, Sánchez E, Nuez F (2004) Creaminess and chemical composition in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): the roles of protein and starch. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Grain Legumes: legumes for the benefit of agriculture nutrition and environment, Dijon. n. 397

  • Rebourg C, Gouesnard B, Charcosset A (2001) Large scale molecular analysis of traditional European maize populations. Relationships with morphological variation. Heredity 86:574–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez E (2003) Variabilitat de la mongeta Ganxet (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): determinació de tipologies i selecció de línies comercials. Ph. D. Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona. Also available in <http://tdx.cesca.es/TESIS_UB/AVAILABLE/ TDX-0527104–115236//TESI.pdf>

  • Santalla M, Rodiño AP, de Ron AM (2002) Allozyme evidence supporting southwestern Europe as a secondary center of genetic diversity for the common bean. Theor Appl Genet 104:934–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skroch PW, Nienhuis J (1995) Qualitative and quantitative characterization of RAPD variation among snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes. Theor Appl Genet 91:1078–1085

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skroch PW, Nienhuis J, Beebe S, Tohme J, Pedraza F (1998) Comparison of Mexican common bean (P. vulgaris L.) core and reserve germplasm collections. Crop Sci 38:488–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicard D, Nanni L, Porfiri O, Bulfon D, Papa R (2005) Genetic diversity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus coccineus L. landraces in central Italy. Plant Breed 124:464–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Michener CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kans Sci Bull 38:1409–1438

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosti N, Negri V (2005) On-going on-farm microevolutionary processes in neighbouring cowpea landraces revealed by molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 110:1275–1283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vellvé R (1992) Saving the seed: genetic diversity and European agriculture. Earthscan Publ, London, UK

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesc Casañas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sánchez, E., Sifres, A., Casañas, F. et al. The endangered future of organoleptically prestigious European landraces: Ganxet bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as an example of a crop originating in the Americas. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55, 45–52 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9213-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9213-x

Keywords

Navigation