Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 53, Issue 7, pp 1513–1519 | Cite as

Genetic Diversity of Traditional Chinese Mustard Crops Brassica juncea as Revealed by Phenotypic differences and RAPD Markers

  • Jie Fu
  • Ming-Fang ZhangEmail author
  • Xiao-Hua Qi


This investigation was aimed at exploring the genetic diversity among nine typical accessions of Chinese mustard crops using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers and morphological comparison. Totally, 111 reproducible DNA bands were generated by 16 arbitrary primers, of which 91 bands were proved to be polymorphic. Based on pair-wise comparisons of the amplified bands, genetic similarities were obtained using Nei & Li's similarity coefficients and a dendrogram reflecting their relationships was made using the unweighted pair–group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA). The result of cluster analysis indicated that the nine accessions were capable of being classified into two primary groups, one including accession 2 with expanded root (root mustard), accession 3 with entirely expanded whole stem (long-stem mustard), accession 6 with edible leaves (leaf mustard), accession 8 with edible seed stalk (seed stalk mustard) and another one including accession 4 with expanded basal stem (short-stem mustard), accession 5 with bulgy petiole (leafy bulgy mustard), and accession 9 with mustard-rich seed (seed mustard). Besides, accession 1 with expanded root (root mustard) and accession 7 with edible leaves and seed stalk (seed stalk mustard) were independent of other accessions in the dendrogram. Additionally, by cluster analysis based on highly reproducible RAPD markers, the accessions with similar edible parts of leaves or roots were not actually in the same phylogenetic groups. This implied that they were probably derived from different geographical origins with dissimilar genetic background and possessed higher genetic diversification. Furthermore, the results indicated that the traditional method for classifying Chinese mustard crops was not much reliable as it was largely dependent on phenotypic behaviors. Meanwhile, the phenotypic differences among individuals did not necessarily mean they must have sharp difference in genetic background as they met in the same group. Undoubtedly, these results aforementioned make this crop quite interesting to researchers for further investigating the molecular evolution of this special AABB group.

Key words

Brassica juncea Genetic diversity Mustard crops Phenotype Phylogenesis RAPD 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. M., Barrier, E. Friar, R., Robichaux and M. Purugganan, Interspecific evolution in plant microsatellite structure. Gene 241 (2002) 101-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai-Lin Chen and Xue-Qun Chen, A study on origin of Brassica juncea Coss. in China. J. Southwest Agric. 5 (1992) 6-11Google Scholar
  3. P.A. Crockett, P.L. Bhalla, C.K. Lee and M.B. Singh, RAPD analysis of seed purity in a commercial hybrid cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) cultivar. Genome 43 (2000) 317-321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. J.J. Doyle and J.L. Doyle, Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12 (1990) 13-15Google Scholar
  5. T. Gladis and K. Hammer, The Brassica collection in Gatersleben: Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, Brassica nigra, Brassica rapa. (in German with English summary) Feddes Rep. 103 (1992) 469-507Google Scholar
  6. J. Hu and C.F. Quiros, Identification of broccoli and cauliflower cultivars with RAPD markers. Plant. Cell. Rep. 10 (1991) 505-511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Jain, S. Bhatia, S.S. Banga, S. Prakash and M. Lakshmikumaran, Potential use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique to study the genetic diversity in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and its relationship to heterosis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88 (1994) 116-122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Li and C.F. Quiros, Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and tagging in Brassica. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103 (2001) 455-461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu Pei-Ying 1996. Chinese Mustard. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, pp. 46–56 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  10. R.J. Mailer, R. Scarth and B. Fristensky, Discrimination among cultivars of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using DNA polymorphism amplified from arbitrary primers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87 (1994) 696-704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Nei and W.H. Li, Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979) 5269-5273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Prakash and K. Hinata, Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of crop Brassica a review. Opera. Bot. 55 (1980) 1-57Google Scholar
  13. Ai-Min Qiao, Pei-Ying Liu and Jian-Jun Lei, RAPD analysis of sixteen varieties of mustard. Acta Bot. Sin. 40 (1998) 915-921Google Scholar
  14. M.A Rabbani, A. Iwabuchi, Y. Murakmi, T. Suzuki and K. Takayanagi, Genetic diversity in mustard (Brassica juncea L.) germplasm from Pakistan as determined by RAPDs. Euphytica 103 (1998) 235-242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. J.G.K. Williams, A.R. Kubelik, K.J. Livak, J.A. Rafalski and S.V. Tingey, DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acid Res. 18 (1990) 6531-6535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang Yi-Geng, Liu Nian-CiChen Xue-Qun, Chen Cai-Lin, Zhou Guang-Fan and Liao Ke-Li 1989. A study on classification of Brassica juncea Coss. Acta Hort. Sin. 16: 114–121 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Genetic Resources & Functional Improvement for Horticultural Plant, Department of Horticultural ScienceZhejiang UniversityHangzhouP. R. of China
  2. 2.Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Growth, Development & BiotechnologyMinistry of AgricultureHangzhouP. R. of China

Personalised recommendations