Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 41–52 | Cite as

Genetic diversity and differentiation of Camellia sinensis L. (cultivated tea) and its wild relatives in Yunnan province of China, revealed by morphology, biochemistry and allozyme studies

  • Jin Chen
  • Pingsheng Wang
  • Yongmei Xia
  • Mei Xu
  • Shengji Pei


We evaluated morphological, isozyme and biochemical diversity of a total of 87 accessions in the genus Camellia [Camellia sinensis var. sinensis (10), C. talinensis (7), C. sinensis var. dehungensis (3), C. crassicolumna (3) and C. sinensis var. assamica (64)]. Great variation of morphological characters was apparent within each taxa. Across the five taxa, all leaf and most flower quantitative characters showed significant differences while all fruit quantitative characters measured did not differ significantly, and, seven (i.e., life form, bud color, petal texture, pubescence on ovary, style number, stamen location and locule per fruit) of the 33 qualitative characters yield significant differences. As a whole, caffeine content had the highest variation with CV of 22.7%, water extract solid showed the least variation (13.4%) and content of polyphenols (20.0%) and free amino acids (18.8%) showed intermediate variations. Camellia taliensis and C. sinensis var. assamica had significantly higher content of polyphenols and water extract solid than in the other three taxa, while no significant differences were detected for the content of caffeine and free amino acids. For allozyme study, 14 loci presented good resolution, among which, nine loci (64%) were polymorphic in each taxon (AAT-3, FUM-1, 6PDG-1, G6PDH-1, G3PDH-1, ME-1, PGM-1, PGM-2 and SKD-1). The percentage of polymorphic loci (P) for each taxon was 21.4–50.0%. Mean heterozygosity per locus (He) varied 0.114–0.218. FST value indicated that only 4.6% of the variations could be ascribable to genetic differences among taxa. Genetic relationships among the five taxa revealed by allozymes, were also exposed by the result of clustering of the morphological and biochemical characters.

Key words

Allozyme Biochemistry Camellia Differentiation Genetic diversity Morphology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banerjee B. 1992. Botanical classification of tea. In: Wilson K.C. and Clifford M.N. (eds), Tea: Cultivation to Consumption, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 25–51.Google Scholar
  2. Chang H.T. and Bartholomew B. 1984. Camellia. B.T. Batsford, London.Google Scholar
  3. Chen X.Y. 1994. The Original Locality of Tea Plant. Yunnan People’s Press, Kunming Yunnan, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  4. Doebley J. 1989. Isozymic evidence and the evolution of crop plants. In: Soltis D.E. and Soltis P.S. (eds), Isozymes in Plant Biology, Dioscorides, Portland, OR, pp. 165–191.Google Scholar
  5. Du Q.Z., Li M.J. and Liu W.H. 1990. Chemical and numerical taxonomies of plants Thea section plants. J. Tea Sci. 10: 1–12 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  6. Evans J.C. 1992. Tea in China. Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  7. Hebert P.D.N. and Beaton M.J. 1993. Methodologies for Allozyme Analysis using Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis: A practical Handbook. (An educational service of Helena Laboratories).Google Scholar
  8. Ikeda N., Kawada M. and Takeda Y. 1991. Isozymic analysis of Camellia sinensis and its interspecific hybrids. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium of Tea Science, held at Shizouka, Japan, 26–28 August 1991, pp. 98 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  9. Kaundun S.S. and Park Y.G. 2002. Genetic structure of six Korean tea populations as revealed by RAPD-PCR markers. Crop Sci. 42: 594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaundun S.S., Zhyvoloup A. and Park Y.G. 2000. Evaluation of the genetic diversity among elite tea (Camellia sinensis var. sinensis) accessions using RAPD markers. Euphytica 115: 7–16.Google Scholar
  11. Lai J.A., Yang W.C. and Hsiao J.Y. 2001. An assessment of genetic relationships in cultivated tea clones and native wild tea in Taiwan using RAPD and ISSR maskers. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica 42: 93–100.Google Scholar
  12. Lee S.H., Choi H.S., Kim R.S., Lee H.Y. and Nou I.S. 1995. Identification of Korean wild tea plants and Japanese green tea cultivars using RAPD markers. J. Korean Tea Sci. 1: 129–148.Google Scholar
  13. Levin D.A. 2002. Hybridization and extinction. Am. Sci. 90: 254–261.Google Scholar
  14. Li H.L. 1983. The domestication of plants in China: ecogeographical considerations. In: Keightley D.N. (ed.), The Origins of Chinese Civilization, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lu C.Y., Liu W.H. and Li M.J. 1992. Relationship between the evolutionary relatives and the variation of esterase isozymes in tea plant. J. Tea Sci. 12: 15–20 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  16. Magoma G.N., Wachira F.N., Obanda M., Imbuga M. and Agong S.G. 2000. The use of catechins as biochemical markers in diversity studies of tea (Camellia sinensis). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 47: 107–114.Google Scholar
  17. Matsumoto S., Takeuchi A., Hayatsu M. and Kondo S. 1994. Molecular cloning of phenylalanine ammonia lyase cDNA and classification of varieties and cultivars of tea plants (Camellia sinensis) using the tea PAL cDNA probe. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 671–675.Google Scholar
  18. Ming T.L. 2000. Monograph of the Genus Camellia. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming, Yunnan, China, pp. 110–135 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  19. Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of indivisuals. Genetics 89: 583–590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Paul S., Wachira F.N., Powell W. and Waugh R. 1997. Diversity and genetic differentiation among populations of Indian and Kenyan tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) revealed by AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 255–263.Google Scholar
  21. Sao W.F. and Sheng P.H. 1993. The brief history and characteristic of Pu’er Tea in Yunnan province. Chinese Agr. Archaeol. (supplement issue for Chinese tea culture), 50–54 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. Sealy J. 1958. A Revision of the Genus Camellia. Royal Horticultural Society, London.Google Scholar
  23. Song W.X. and Li D.P. 1990. Din Hai Yu Heng Zhi Jiao Zhu. Yunnan People’s Press, Kunming, Yunnan, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  24. Swofford D.L. and Selander R.B. 1989. BIOSYS-1: a computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in population genetics and biochemical systematics. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Takeda Y. 1990. Cross compatibility of tea (Camellia sinensis) and its allied species in the genus Camellia. Jpn. Agrric. Res. Q. 24: 111–116.Google Scholar
  26. Takeda Y. 1994. Differences in caffeine and tannin contents between tea cultivars and application to tea breeding. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 28: 117–123.Google Scholar
  27. Toyao T. and Takeda Y. 1999. Studies on geographical diversity of floral morphology of tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) using the method of numerical taxonomy. Tea Res. J. 87: 39–57.Google Scholar
  28. TLPMBand ITP (Tea and Livestock Products Management Bureau and Institute of Tea Processing, the Ministry of Commerce), 1989. The Physiochemical Analysis of Tea. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  29. Ukers W.H. 1935. All About Tea. Tea and Coffee Trade Journals, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Wachira F., Tanaka J. and Takeda Y. 2001. Genetic variation and differentiation in tea (Camellia sinensis) germplasm revealed by RAPD and AFLP variation. J. Hortic. Sci. Bio. Tech. 76: 557–563.Google Scholar
  31. Wachira F., Wauch R., Hachett C.A. and Powell W. 1995. Detection of genetic diversity in tea (Camellia sinensis) using RAPD markers. Genome 38: 201–210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wachira F.N., Powell W. and Waugh R. 1997. An assessment of genetic diversity among Camellia sinensis L. (cultivated tea) and its wild relatives based on randomly amplified polymorphic DNA and organelle specific STS. Heredity 78: 603–611.Google Scholar
  33. Weatherstone J. 1992. Historical introduction. In: Willson K.C. and Clifford M.N. (eds), Tea: Cultivation to Consumption, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  34. Weeden N.F. and Wendel J.F. 1989. Genetics of plant isozymes. In: Soltis D.E. and Soltis P.S. (eds), Isozymes in Plant Biology, Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR, pp. 46–72.Google Scholar
  35. Wichremaratne M.R. 1981. Variation in some leaf characteristics in tea (Camellia sinensis L.) and their use in the identification of clones. Tea Q. 50: 183–189.Google Scholar
  36. Wright S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 4, Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  37. Wright W. and Gilchrist R.C.J.H. 1961. The concept of kind of tea. Nature 191: 14–16.Google Scholar
  38. Xiang D. 1962. Man Shu Jiao Zhu. Zhong Hua Shu Ju, Beijing, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  39. Yunnan Statistic Bureau, 2000. Yunnan Annual Statistic Report. China Statistic Press, Beijing, China, 222 pp. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  40. Zeng Y.W., Wang J.J., Yang Z.Y., Shen S.Q., Wu L.H., Chen X.Y. and Meng J.G. 2001. The diversity and sustainable development of crop genetic resources in the Lancang River Valley. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 48: 297–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jin Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pingsheng Wang
    • 3
  • Yongmei Xia
    • 1
  • Mei Xu
    • 3
  • Shengji Pei
    • 2
  1. 1.Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesMengla, Yunnan provinceChina
  2. 2.Kunming Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesKunming, Yunnan provinceChina
  3. 3.Tea Research InstituteYunnan Academy of Agricultural SciencesMenghai, Yunnan provinceChina

Personalised recommendations