Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of Calcium Oxide Additive on the Properties and Structure of Building Geopolymers Based on Fly Ash from CHPP-22

  • Published:
Glass and Ceramics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The physicomechanical properties and microstructure of geopolymer building materials, based on low-calcium fly ash from CHPP-22, were investigated as functions of the type of activator, temperature-and-humidity conditions of curing, and an additional source of calcium [CaO] added in the amounts 10, 15, and 20 wt.%. It was found that the most effective type of activator for the studied fly ash is a sodium silicate solution with silicate modulus SiO2 /Na2O = 1 and the preferred curing regime is steam treatment at 90°C. The introduction of 15% CaO into the geopolymer mixture made it possible to increase the compressive strength by more than 2.5-fold (to 38 MPa) with open porosity decreasing from 24 to 7% and water absorption from 15 to 3%. However, a subsequent increase in the weight content of CaO effects degradation of the properties due to significantly shorter setting times of the raw mixture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Duxson, A. Fernández-Jiménez, J. Provis, and G. C. Lukey, “Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art,” J. Mater. Sci., 42(9), 2917 – 2933 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. S. J. Van Deventer, J. L. Provis, and P. Duxson, “Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement,” Miner. Eng., 29, 89 – 104 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. L. Provis and J. S. J. van Deventer, “Geopolymers and other alkali-activated materials,” in: Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, Elsevier Ltd. (2019), pp. 779 – 805.

  4. E. A. Yatsenko, V. A. Smolii, L. V. Klimova, et al., “Solid fuel combustion wastes at CHPP in the arctic zone of the Russian Federation: Utility in eco-geopolymer technology,” Steklo Keram., No. 9, 40 – 44 (2021); Glass Ceram., 78(9 – 10), 374 – 377 (2022).

  5. F. Farooq, X. Jin, A. Faisal, and A. Akbar, “Geopolymer concrete as sustainable material: A state of the art review,” Constr. Build. Mater., 306 (March), 124762 (2021).

  6. J. L. Provis, “Geopolymers and other alkali activated materials: Why, how, and what?,” Mater. Struct. Constr., 47(1–2), 11 – 25 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. X. Y. Zhuang, L. Chen, S. Komarneni, et al., “Fly ash-based geopolymer: Clean production, properties and applications,” J. Clean. Prod., 125, 253 – 267 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. V. ž ivica, M. T. Palou, and M. Križma, “Geopolymer cements and their properties: A review,” Build. Res. J., 61(2), 85 – 100 (2015).

  9. C. K. Yip, J. Provis, J. S. J. Van Deventer, and G. C. Lukey, “Effect of calcium silicate sources on geopolymerisation,” Cem. Concr. Res., 38(4), 554 – 564 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. X. Zhao, Lu Mingyu, Jiachen Zhang, et al., “Investigation into the effect of calcium on the existence form of geopolymerized gel product of fly ash based geopolymers,” Cem. Concr. Compos., Elsevier (2019), V. 103, pp. 279 – 292 (July 2018).

  11. E. Kusumastuti, F. I. Ariati, and L. Atmaja, “Synthesis of volcanic ash-based geopolymer with calcium oxide (CaO) addition for building material application,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1567(2) (2020).

  12. M. S. Kim, Yu. Jun, Ch. Lee, and J. E. Oh, “Use of CaO as an activator for producing a price-competitive non-cement structural binder using ground granulated blast furnace slag,” Cem. Concr. Res., 54, 208 – 214 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Chindaprasirt, T. Phoo-ngernkham, S. Hanjitsuwan, et al., “Effect of calcium-rich compounds on setting time and strength development of alkali-activated fly ash cured at ambient temperature,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 9, 198 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Pangdaeng, T. Phoo-ngernkham, V. Sata, and P. Chindaprasirt, “Influence of curing conditions on properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer containing Portland cement as additive,” Mater. Des., 53, 269 – 274 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Shi, B. Qu, and J. L. Provis, “Recent progress in low-carbon binders,” Cem. Concr. Res., 122 (April), 227 – 250 (2019).

Download references

The work was performed using the equipment at the Department of Chemical Technology of Glass and Glass Ceramics and the Center for Collective Use at the Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia and with financial support from the Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia (project G-2021-023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. N. Klimenko.

Additional information

Translated from Steklo i Keramika, No. 2, pp. 32 – 39, February, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klimenko, N.N., Kiseleva, K.I., Delitsyn, L.M. et al. Influence of Calcium Oxide Additive on the Properties and Structure of Building Geopolymers Based on Fly Ash from CHPP-22. Glass Ceram 79, 65–69 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10717-022-00456-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10717-022-00456-7

Keywords

Navigation