All of the drawbacks of the ordinary traditionally prepared cullet-containing batch are the cause of constant improvement of batch preparation technologies. It was shown that briquetting of the batch is a function of the cullet content and especially the cullet particle size.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
“Power consumption in bottle glass production in Great Britain,” Steklyan. Tara, No. 3, 2–5 (2006).
A. P. Sivko, A. I. Kovalenko, and A. K. Osipov, “Experience in use of a high cullet content in the batch in melting electric lamp glass,” Steklo Mira, No. 2, 56–59 (2006).
A. A. Ketov, P. A. Ketov, and S. I. Puzanov, “Low-quality cullet—problems and solutions,” Steklo Mira, No. 6, 48–54 (2006).
H. Bach, F. Baucke, R. Bruckner, et al., Types of Defects in Production of Glass [Russian translation], Stroiizdat, Moscow. (1986).
A. Tumas, L. Kemeklis, A. Balandis, and G. Vaickelionis, “Improved preparation of a batch mixture with cullet in melting vacuum tube glass,” Steklo Keram., No. 1, 14–16 (2006).
V. V. Efremenkov and K. Yu. Subbotin, “Optimizing the batch charge in the glass-melting furnace,” Steklo Keram., No. 10, 17–18 (2006).
N. A. Pankova and N. Yu. Mikhailenko, The Glass Batch and Batch Production Practice [in Russian], Moscow (1997).
N. S. Krasheninnikova, E. N. Belomestnova, and V. I. Vereshchagin, “Criteria for assessing glass batch moldability,” Steklo Keram., No. 3, 15_–17 (1991).
N. N. Rokhlin, Preparation of Glass Batch [in Russian], Nos. 1–2, VNIIÉSM, Moscow (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Steklo i Keramika, No. 9, pp. 14–18, September, 2008.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Min’ko, N.I., Laz’ko, E.A. & Doroganov, E.A. Effect of finely disperse cullet on glass batch briquetting. Glass Ceram 65, 305–309 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10717-009-9075-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10717-009-9075-0